Re: Average Balance Report

Ok, hopefully third try is a charm after netscape and system crashes... Christopher Browne wrote: > I've done considerable work over the last week "cleaning up" the > various reports, with the notable intent of factoring out common code > with a view to moving towards supporting multiple output

Data Changes

On 27 Feb 2000 14:52:54 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is something that deserves some discussion, because the > > solution is not entirely clear. Somehow, we should associate > > the account-e

Re: Some Comments

> The significant missing pieces, at this point, for Super-Duper QIF import, ar > e: > > a) The overall dialog that I show above; > b) The linkage to an "Account Selector" dialog > c) Linkage to Create New Account Dialog, and > d) The functions to conveniently create transactions. I'll create

Re: Some Comments

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:56:40 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as David A Fenyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, you wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, you wrote: > > > > To clarify, It would be nice to be able to override any imbedded account name > and ust specify each time in

Average Balance Report

I've done considerable work over the last week "cleaning up" the various reports, with the notable intent of factoring out common code with a view to moving towards supporting multiple output formats. I've put together some "HTML generator" functions to create cells and rows in a moderately inte

Notification: incoming/110

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/110 Message summary for PR#110 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug in register Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 16349 invoked from network); 1 Mar

Notification: incoming/109

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/109 Message summary for PR#109 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ../../src/gnome/scripts_menu.h missing Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 10413 invoke

Re: next release

> On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote: > > > "Jon D. Slater" wrote: > > > Use the guile-1.3 rpm, not guile-1.3.4. > > > > Hmm. I have guile 1.3.4 installed, and had no trouble with gnucash from the > CVS. Will something break with the newer guile? No, you are fine using the newer guile. I built t

Re: next release

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote: > > "Jon D. Slater" wrote: > Use the guile-1.3 rpm, not guile-1.3.4. > Hmm. I have guile 1.3.4 installed, and had no trouble with gnucash from the CVS. Will something break with the newer guile? David -- David Fenyes -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gnucash Develop

Notification: incoming/108

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/108 Message summary for PR#108 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Currency name from locale overrides preferences Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 743

Notification: incoming/107

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/107 Message summary for PR#107 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Import QIF issue Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 2830 invoked from network); 1 Mar

Re: next release

> "Jon D. Slater" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I downloaded the .rpm version of GnuCash last night. > > > > When I tried to install it, it complained that I didn't have "libguile.so.4 > ". > > > > So, I downloaded and installed the lib. > > > > GnuCash.rpm *still* complained that I didn't have

Re: next release

"Jon D. Slater" wrote: > > Hi, > > I downloaded the .rpm version of GnuCash last night. > > When I tried to install it, it complained that I didn't have "libguile.so.4". > > So, I downloaded and installed the lib. > > GnuCash.rpm *still* complained that I didn't have libguile.so.4 (which now

Re: next release

Sabatke, Jim wrote: > -- I decided to give gnucash another try (compiling). > > First, I found I needed a new version of XmHTML. I downloaded version > 1.1.7 and it failed because it doesn't have a src directory. Then I > tried version 1.1.0. It fails with unknown *.h files: > Sigh, is ther

Re: heretical question

"Tony Taylor (ISD)" wrote: > Cons: The Gnome user-base is mostly technical; most lay-users are going with > KDE. So, though the users we do get will be savvy enough to help develop > reports, fix bugs, etc, there won't be a lot of "normal" users. I use KDE as desktop, but I use the GIMP and gnu

Re: heretical question

> > would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome > version? That's a good question. I think a slightly less heretical question is should we continue to support the motif version? I make sure that nothing I do breaks the motif version in any way, but sometimes maintaining

Notification: incoming/106

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/106 Message summary for PR#106 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: improper import of .qif files Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 6939 invoked from net

Notification: incoming/105

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/105 Message summary for PR#105 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: second reconcile column Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 4286 invoked from network);

Notification: incoming/104

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/104 Message summary for PR#104 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: imported qif files all dated 1231 1969 Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 31468 invoke

RE: heretical question

Rob Walker wrote: > > would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome > version? > > rob Pros: it'll be easier to get a complete version out the door. Cons: The Gnome user-base is mostly technical; most lay-users are going with KDE. So, though the users we do get will be

Notification: incoming/103

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/103 Message summary for PR#103 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: reports Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 13095 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2000 16

Notification: incoming/102

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/102 Message summary for PR#102 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: reports Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 12123 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2000 16

heretical question

would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome version? rob -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Notification: incoming/101

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/101 Message summary for PR#101 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnucash lockup Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 8717 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2

Re: pay bills

run up debt -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pilot?

I'll probably toy with the idea until May and then run with it. I have more than I can handle as it is until then. Chris -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ece.msstate.edu/~ruff/ On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:00:52PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > > Has there been any talk or act

Notification: incoming/100

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/100 Message summary for PR#100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qt gnucash pgcc-2.85.2 Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 25110 invoked from network);

Notification: incoming/99

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/99 Message summary for PR#99 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: scrollbars flickering Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 21977 invoked from network); 29

Re: next release

"Sabatke, Jim" wrote: > > I decided to give gnucash another try (compiling). > > First, I found I needed a new version of XmHTML. I downloaded version > 1.1.7 and it failed because it doesn't have a src directory. Then I > tried version 1.1.0. It fails with unknown *.h files: > > > Sigh, is

Notification: incoming/95

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#95 from incoming to gnucash-gnome Message summary for PR#95 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PRIVATE: segfault on entering transfer-name Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS <

Notification: incoming/97

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#97 from incoming to supporting-files Message summary for PR#97 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: READMEs not up to date Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail

Re: next release

I decided to give gnucash another try (compiling). First, I found I needed a new version of XmHTML. I downloaded version 1.1.7 and it failed because it doesn't have a src directory. Then I tried version 1.1.0. It fails with unknown *.h files: jim@yoda:~/progs/gnu/XmHTML-1.1.0/tools > make dep

Notification: incoming/96

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#96 from incoming to gnucash-qt Message summary for PR#96 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnucash.qt Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 6085 invoked from

Notification: incoming/98

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#98 from incoming to trash Message summary for PR#98 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: READMEs not up to date Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 18063 invok

Notification: incoming/88

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#88 from incoming to distribution Message summary for PR#88 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rpm install of 1.3 Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 6957 inv

Release statistics!

For the curious: 175,589 hits to the website. 1698 downloads of the binary RPM. 781 downloads of the source tarball. 481 downloads of the source RPM. By comparison... we had approx. 185,000 hits to the website for the entire month of Feb. until yesterday! =) Enjoy! -- Jeremy Collins LinuxM

Notification: incoming/93

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#93 from incoming to transaction-engine Message summary for PR#93 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xaccParseQIFDate tends to get non-US dates wrong Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLL

Notification: incoming/89

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#89 from incoming to supporting-files Message summary for PR#89 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: docs Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 4510 invoked from

Notification: incoming/87

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#87 from incoming to gnucash-gnome Message summary for PR#87 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Gnome locks up using transfer from field Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Re

Notification: incoming/94

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#94 from incoming to fixed Message summary for PR#94 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with Guile Support Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 15438 i

Notification: incoming/91

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#91 from incoming to fixed Message summary for PR#91 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QIF import dates Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 9392 invoked from

Notification: incoming/92

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#92 from incoming to fixed Message summary for PR#92 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug report Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 11686 invoked from netw

Notification: incoming/90

Gnucash BugTrack notification jcollins moved PR#90 from incoming to fixed Message summary for PR#90 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: totals error in account transactions report Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Receive

Notification: incoming/98

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/98 Message summary for PR#98 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: READMEs not up to date Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 18063 invoked from network); 2

Notification: incoming/97

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/97 Message summary for PR#97 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: READMEs not up to date Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 18021 invoked from network); 2

pay bills

-- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

next release

I am going to try to make a new release about once a week, probably on Sundays. So, in general, if you want your stuff in the next release, try to get it to me by Saturday afternoon, Pacific Standard. If possible, please send me diffs and not complete files. If you don't want to use make-gnucash

cvs

CVS has been updated. Bugs fixed: 90, 91, 92, 94 New Stuff: + Fixed bug 90 in transaction report. + Fixed bug 92 in account balance report. + Fixed C-code QIF importing for 4-digit dates (x/x/2000). This should fix bug 91. + Fixed C-code QIF importing for x/x' 00 dates (this is

Notification: incoming/96

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/96 Message summary for PR#96 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnucash.qt Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 6085 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2000 09

Re: Notification: incoming/95

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Other things is that I selected ISO date format but that only shows in the > trasaction > table. In other parts of the program it's the strange american way to write > dates :-) I raised this question, too. But I was told this is a problem with the gnome date widget, so

Notification: incoming/95

Gnucash BugTrack notification new message incoming/95 Message summary for PR#95 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PRIVATE: segfault on entering transfer-name Date: unknown 0 replies 0 followups > ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS < Received: (qmail 2067 invo