Success!

1999-11-11 Thread Bruce Z. Lysik
Hi folks. Well, I recently succeeded in getting the gnome version of gnucash compiled and working. Excellent! Come a long way since last time I checked. Now I've got a couple questions and an observation. First, I did the default ./configure and later a make install which installed things und

Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit off topic---Java as "SUN's language" (was Re: Java implementation))

1999-11-11 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Bzzt, you missed the point, you don't need to implement a parser (that > was PHP's big mistake that eperl solves). All that the start-tag does is > imply 'pipe this from here, up to the end tag, to the stdin of the > real parser'. Umm. I'm not so sure I missed the

Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit off topic---Java as "SUN's language" (was Re: Java implementation))

1999-11-11 Thread jrb
> >> As long as we're talking about what components to swap out, it was reporte d > >> on the gimp list today by Federico Mena that the GNOME project is dumping > >> the use of GtkXmHTML, the Gtk port of XmHTML. He indicated that it wasn't > >> being maintained any more and had some other problem

A question about the engine

1999-11-11 Thread Dave Peticolas
I have a question about using the function xaccRecomputeGroupBalance. I think this needs to be called before updating the main window's account tree to make sure the account totals are correct. Otherwise, if you delete/modify a sub-account, the totals for the parent accounts won't be correct. Th

Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit off topic---Java as "SUN's language" (was Re: Java implementation))

1999-11-11 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said: > > 1) create a special markup language, and let an interpreter make > >substituitons into it: > > > > The account name is > > The account balance is > > > >Pros: effective, high performance, low-tech, simple. > >

Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit off topic---Java as "SUN's language" (was Re: Java implementation))

1999-11-11 Thread Dave Peticolas
> It's been rumoured that Dave Peticolas said: > > On a related note, can you build without nana? > > > > Has anyone used nana? Right now, we just seem > > to be using it as a replacement for 'assert'. > > I'm not married to nana. It doesn't do all of the things I would have > liked it to do. I