Le 28/09/2016 à 08:03, Sriram Ramkrishna a écrit :
>
>
> Jean-Christophe Baptiste : to answer your question in regards to the tray
> design, last time I heard about it, the design is not complete. I don't
> think anybody is quite happy with what we have right now. Allan or Lapo can
> probab
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 20:42, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 16:05 +0200, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > While it makes sense for some applications, like email, it's rather
> > confusing for something like an IRC client: I don't want it to run at
> > start up, but I also want to b
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM 0x90 <0...@phocean.net> wrote:
> Le 28/09/2016 à 08:03, Sriram Ramkrishna a écrit :
> >
> > Jean-Christophe Baptiste : to answer your question in regards to the
> tray design, last time I heard about it, the design is not complete. I
> don't think anybody is quite
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:20 AM Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM 0x90 <0...@phocean.net> wrote:
>
>> Le 28/09/2016 à 08:03, Sriram Ramkrishna a écrit :
>> >
>> > Jean-Christophe Baptiste : to answer your question in regards to the
>> tray design, last time I heard about it
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 15:54 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > Running applications in the background is a valid use, and we'd
> > like to improve on what we have. We don't think legacy status icons
> > are a good pattern and discourage their use
> Yeah, I think this is what I was remembering, not
> TL;DR:
> Running applications in the background is a valid use, and we'd like to
> improve on what we have. We don't think legacy status icons are a good
> pattern and discourage their use.
>
>
> Yeah, I think this is what I was remembering, not specifically legacy status
> icons whi
