> TL;DR: > Running applications in the background is a valid use, and we'd like to > improve on what we have. We don't think legacy status icons are a good > pattern and discourage their use. > > > Yeah, I think this is what I was remembering, not specifically legacy status > icons which as you correctly said has a number of flaws. Strangely, I don't > really miss the tray icons.. So, victory? >
I agree that your target is good and that ideally we would not need the tray. But I do miss a replacement, seriously, without TopIcons I would not be using Gnome. I am not alone, just look at the popularity of topicons and topicons plus and read the comments. So, no, not really a victory. _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
