Hi Emmanuele,
Thanks for the tip, I didn't know that.
Still it's more convenient to my use case "catch" bugs while I'm available
(active on IRC) rather than goign trought all the emails.
But I was also worried about the channel being too busy.
So if no one more have m
hi Carlos;
On 7 April 2014 08:46, Carlos Soriano Sánchez
wrote:
> Gnome shell has a big amount of filed bugs per day. I think that makes it
> uncontrolable for free-time contributors like me.
> But I think we(free time contributors) are still interested in new bugs to
> solve or to
Hi,
Gnome shell has a big amount of filed bugs per day. I think that makes it
uncontrolable for free-time contributors like me.
But I think we(free time contributors) are still interested in new bugs to
solve or to mark them as duplicated and do a little of bugzilla management.
Subscribing to the
Hi, list,
Thanks for raising bugs but in case nobody said this: GNOME shell are
only responsible for what happens with the gnome-shell module, not the
entire gnome git moduleset so this list is possibly not the right place
for a discussion about gnome bugs everywhere but since the topic is
raised
ill wrote:
> > Now, new features that no one really asked for are implemented and the
> > bugs keep piling up and extensions that worked, don't, themes that
> > worked, don't.
>
> I actually agree that GNOME in general would probably be better off if
> we put mo
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 07:08 -0600, Marshall Neill wrote:
> Now, new features that no one really asked for are implemented and the
> bugs keep piling up and extensions that worked, don't, themes that
> worked, don't.
I actually agree that GNOME in general would probably be b
hi;
On 17 January 2014 14:54, alex diavatis wrote:
> Emmanuele, Jasper,
>
> Okay, although I think duplicate (or irrelevant?) bugs make your life really
> hard :)
they really don't: duplicate bugs don't show up in queries, and
marking dupes takes literally two clicks
They don't. Don't feel bad about reporting too many bugs.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:54 AM, alex diavatis wrote:
> Emmanuele, Jasper,
>
> Okay, although I think duplicate (or irrelevant?) bugs make your life
> really hard :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan
Emmanuele, Jasper,
Okay, although I think duplicate (or irrelevant?) bugs make your life
really hard :)
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> On 17 January 2014 14:15, alex diavatis wrote:
> > I wish you could clean up bugs from un-maintained
hi;
On 17 January 2014 14:15, alex diavatis wrote:
> I wish you could clean up bugs from un-maintained modules or bugs you won't
> fix, because it makes hard to file new bugs, since you have to search if a
> bug exists.
bugs are usually marked as WONTFIX; people can ask them to
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I just looked at the 100 tickets that I filed that are still open in
>> Bugzilla -- the majority of them are patches to fix existing bugs I found,
>> new features, or code cleanups, or other things like that.
>>
&
If you search for a bit and don't find anything, just report it. If it's a
duplicate, it's not a big deal, it's a few clicks for me.
I'd rather have 20 duplicates than one unreported bug.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:15 AM, alex diavatis wrote:
> I wish you could clea
I wish you could clean up bugs from un-maintained modules or bugs you won't
fix, because it makes hard to file new bugs, since you have to search if a
bug exists.
- alex
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I just looked at the 100 tickets that I filed that a
I just looked at the 100 tickets that I filed that are still open in
Bugzilla -- the majority of them are patches to fix existing bugs I found,
new features, or code cleanups, or other things like that.
Only six or so were actual bugs.
I do report bugs whenever I find them, but the majority of
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:56 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> This is even my feeling: there are few developers for a really short
> version life (6 months!).
> Since Gnome is the face of my OS, I expect robustness more than
> fancies. I understand that fixing bugs is boring while i
t robustness more than fancies. I
> understand that fixing bugs is boring while implement new feature is
> exciting, but we could meet in the middle.
>
you should probably read the bug statistics as well.
bugs *are* being fixed, in some cases through the introduction of new
features that
This is even my feeling: there are few developers for a really short
version life (6 months!).
Since Gnome is the face of my OS, I expect robustness more than fancies. I
understand that fixing bugs is boring while implement new feature is
exciting, but we could meet in the middle.
My 2 cent
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:47 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> this is a logical fallacy: software is not a car.
But people do *LOVE* that metaphor. It seems as though, in America,
**everything** is a car. And, BTW, nobody *else* knows how to drive,
they are all 'idiots'.
--
Adam Tauno Williams <
re 46,000 bugs in Gnome 3.
no, there are 46,000 tickets open (excluding requests for
enhancements) in the *whole* GNOME Bugzilla as for 2013:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2014-January/msg00062.html
that contains actual bugs, as well as untriaged issues that may be
re
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 07:08 -0600, Marshall Neill wrote:
> I have a feeling this will upset the developers but I believe it has to
> be said.,
> I recently read that there are 46,000 bugs in Gnome 3.
> Now I would think logic would dictate that you fix bugs instead of
> implementi
I have a feeling this will upset the developers but I believe it has to
be said.,
I recently read that there are 46,000 bugs in Gnome 3.
Now I would think logic would dictate that you fix bugs instead of
implementing new features.
Seems like the developers are more interested in change than
for this component [3].
> [3]
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gnome-shell&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=keyboard
FWIW, I went through the bug list (and related caribou bugs) and tried
to add comments
On Mar 23, 2012 1:49 AM, "Diego Fernandez"
wrote:
> When I Alt + Esc between windows, the
> border is appearing in the wrong places and I sometimes get visual
> artifacts. Before I file a bug I'd like to know if anyone else is
> experiencing this
Yes, see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi
Hi, I'm currently testing Gnome 3.4 on Arch Linux. I installed it
with the testing and gnome-unstable repos enabled.
I tried going on the IRC to discuss these issues but I keep getting
kicked saying "Killed (Proxy or TOR node (tor-irc.dnsbl.oftc.net))" I
do run a relay, but I'm sending my IRC th
On jue, 2011-06-30 at 17:05 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > In both cases, it looks like the relevant GConf keys are not dynamically
> > monitored
> I thought it was updated without restart, but these GConf settings will
> be refactored soon in the move to GSettings anyway. So there's little
On 06/30/2011 05:05 PM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>> In both cases, it looks like the relevant GConf keys are not dynamically
>> monitored
> I thought it was updated without restart, but these GConf settings will
> be refactored soon in the move to GSettings anyway. So there's little
> point in de
Le jeudi 30 juin 2011 à 16:57 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> When using the aforementioned combination, the following features either
> do not function or require workarounds:
>
> * Shell
> - Arrangement of buttons on the titlebar:
> requires restarting gnome-shell be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
When using the aforementioned combination, the following features either
do not function or require workarounds:
* Shell
- Arrangement of buttons on the titlebar:
requires restarting gnome-shell before it takes effect.
* Windows
- Cu
For gnome-shell, I've integrated below a list sent to me by Ionut Biru
and information about patches in the Fedora 3.0.1 RPM (mostly
suggestions from Dan Williams.)
Because of the number of patches *on* these lists, I'm not going to look at all
at stuff on master nobody proposed or outstanding unc
On 05/24/2011 01:45 AM, Jesper Andersen wrote:
>>> MUTTER
>>> Definitely Want to Have:
>
> How about this one:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597190
> "Window switcher and focus follows mouse"
>
> It certainly would be useful to me.
That patch hasn't even been committed yet, and so
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:24, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Hi Nohemi -
>
> Welcome to SOC! Thanks a lot for doing this, it's very useful. I'll
> comment on Mutter patches first since that's a smaller set.
>
> - Owen
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:06 -0500, Nohemi Fernandez wrote:
>
>> MUTTER
>> Definitely
Hi Nohemi -
Welcome to SOC! Thanks a lot for doing this, it's very useful. I'll
comment on Mutter patches first since that's a smaller set.
- Owen
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:06 -0500, Nohemi Fernandez wrote:
> MUTTER
> Definitely Want to Have:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
Hello all,
I have compiled a list of all the small bugs that have been fixed since the
3.0.1 push that may be nice to have in this upcoming upgrade for both Gnome
and Mutter. I hope this will be useful in the decisions you have to make for
the upgrade!
-Nohemi (GSOC 2011)
*GNOME*
*Definitely
33 matches
Mail list logo
