This is even my feeling: there are few developers for a really short version life (6 months!). Since Gnome is the face of my OS, I expect robustness more than fancies. I understand that fixing bugs is boring while implement new feature is exciting, but we could meet in the middle.
My 2 cent opinion. On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Neill <ramie...@windstream.net>wrote: > I have a feeling this will upset the developers but I believe it has to be > said., > I recently read that there are 46,000 bugs in Gnome 3. > Now I would think logic would dictate that you fix bugs instead of > implementing new features. > Seems like the developers are more interested in change than fixing what > is broken. > If that logic was applied to automobiles I believe public outcry would > demand that the vehicles be fixed first. > Now, new features that no one really asked for are implemented and the > bugs keep piling up and extensions that worked, don't, themes that worked, > don't. > Well, enough of my rant. I think you can see where I am coming from. > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > -- Ciao* Donato* <http://it.linkedin.com/in/donatomarrazzo>
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
