On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:40 PM François Guerraz wrote:
> I take it it's not possible then? Do I need to put a feature request?
> This is quite an essential feature for full Wayland support!
>
On wayland, window decorations are part of the client window, i.e. the
application itself. I'm not sure
Hello,
I take it it's not possible then? Do I need to put a feature request?
This is quite an essential feature for full Wayland support!
François.
On 20/05/16 11:30, François Guerraz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a follow up to this old conversation:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shel
Hello,
This is a follow up to this old conversation:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2014-September/msg0002
0.html
I was wondering if you knew of any other trick to make extensions such
as pixel-saver in a Wayland world where xprop isn't an option?
Best regards,
François
_
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 16:06 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi Devui,
>
>
> > Stop emailing me with random questions. Not sure if this is a glitch,
> > but everyone subscribed to gnome-shell-list@gnome.org is getting these
> > emails.
> Uh, I didn't mail you with this random question, I sent it
Hi Devui,
> Stop emailing me with random questions. Not sure if this is a glitch,
> but everyone subscribed to gnome-shell-list@gnome.org is getting these
> emails.
Uh, I didn't mail you with this random question, I sent it to
gnome-shell-list under the impression that that's the place to go with
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Matthijs Kooijman
wrote:
> Hi Amy,
>
> > Yes, when it has `introspectable="0"` then you can't call it using GIR
> > bindings from JS.
> So it is present in the XML file just to indicate that GIR has found the
> function but wasn't able to generate bindings for it?
Stop emailing me with random questions. Not sure if this is a glitch,
but everyone subscribed to gnome-shell-list@gnome.org is getting these
emails.
___
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome
Hi Amy,
> Yes, when it has `introspectable="0"` then you can't call it using GIR
> bindings from JS.
So it is present in the XML file just to indicate that GIR has found the
function but wasn't able to generate bindings for it? Or do
non-introspectable functions serve a real purpose as well?
> Wh
Hi Matthijs,
Yes, when it has `introspectable="0"` then you can't call it using GIR
bindings from JS.
I found it useful to generate the documentation for Mutter from the gir -
see this (you need g-ir-doc-tool) [0[
What do you want the xwindow for? Back when I wrote the Maximus extension
(quite out
Hey folks,
after digging around with extension js code for a while, I found
that a lot of the native API is "documented" in gir files. In
particular, I was looking at /usr/lib/mutter/Meta-3.0.gir here.
However, I couldn't manage to access the get_xwindow method on the
MetaWindow class. In the gir
10 matches
Mail list logo
