On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Matthijs Kooijman <matth...@stdin.nl> wrote:
> Hi Amy, > > > Yes, when it has `introspectable="0"` then you can't call it using GIR > > bindings from JS. > So it is present in the XML file just to indicate that GIR has found the > function but wasn't able to generate bindings for it? Or do > non-introspectable functions serve a real purpose as well? > > > What do you want the xwindow for? Back when I wrote the Maximus extension > > (quite out of date now) I needed to get the X ID of the window so I could > > undecorate it and neither the X ID or the undecoration were exposed in > the > > Mutter bindings, so I ended up forking out to xwininfo/xprop to do the > job > > [1]. Depending on what you need the xwindow for, perhaps xwininfo/xprop > > could work for you. > I was looking at pixel-saver, which does pretty much the same as > Maximus. It now uses the xwininfo / xprop trick, but when I noticed > get_xwindow, I wondered if that would lead to simpler code. Apparently > not :-) > I'm not comfortable exposing the XID to introspection from inside mutter (it would technically be possible), so the xwininfo / xprop trick is going to be the best you'll get. Sorry about that. > Thanks, > > Matthijs > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > > -- Jasper
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
