Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
...
>> * Bulk close bugs from over two stable releases in the past.
>
> I assume you mean bugs filed on GNOME prior to 3.8 should be closed; I
> think Debian still has 3.8 in testing, which, while fairly old, would
> still fall under the "two stable releases in the past" ru
hi Allan;
On 4 August 2014 16:40, Allan Day wrote:
> * Bulk close bugs from over two stable releases in the past.
I assume you mean bugs filed on GNOME prior to 3.8 should be closed; I
think Debian still has 3.8 in testing, which, while fairly old, would
still fall under the "two stable releas
NEEDINFO will remove the bug from the queries just like RESOLVED; the
reporter is allowed to re-open RESOLVED bugs as well, but unlike that,
we'll need the bug squad to go through all the NEEDINFO bugs in a
couple of months to close them again — generating more bugmail in the
process.
personally,
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 16:40 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> * Bulk close bugs from over two stable releases in the past.
We should mark these bugs NEEDINFO, asking if the bug still exists in
the latest release, a month or two before they are closed, to avoid
frustration when valid bug reports might othe
Christian, there is a video [1] you can see the windows animations from
Giovanni's patch.
Notice that there aren't animations for maximize/unmaximize windows.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHtKkud6_is
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Allan Day wrote:
> Christian Dysthe wrote:
> ...
> > I
Hi all,
This is the continuation of a couple of conversations I had with GNOME
Shell developers during this year's GUADEC. I think we all agree that
the current state of the gnome-shell Bugzilla isn't great. Despite the
efforts of various people, we have a large number of unorganised bugs,
and thi
Christian Dysthe wrote:
...
> I know I'm going to be smacked for this but I'll take my chances. I
> really like nice smooth animations on my desktop and with newer hardware
> I have the power for excesses like that.
...
> Please do not tell how stupid you think animations are. I know a lot of
> pe
