NEEDINFO will remove the bug from the queries just like RESOLVED; the reporter is allowed to re-open RESOLVED bugs as well, but unlike that, we'll need the bug squad to go through all the NEEDINFO bugs in a couple of months to close them again — generating more bugmail in the process.
personally, I'd be okay with NEEDINFO-ing bugs with at least one comment on them; bugs without comments should just be closed, with the explicit invite to reopen them if they can be reproduced with a recent version of GNOME. ciao, Emmanuele. On 4 August 2014 17:49, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 16:40 +0100, Allan Day wrote: >> * Bulk close bugs from over two stable releases in the past. > > We should mark these bugs NEEDINFO, asking if the bug still exists in > the latest release, a month or two before they are closed, to avoid > frustration when valid bug reports might otherwise be closed. > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > -- http://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
