Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Hi, On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Sergey Panov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've mentioned those two examples in the wain attempt to prove that some > (many/most) of the "cultural" sensitivities are ridiculous to the point > of being foony. > > When I saw "foot"(long, long time ago) as a "Gnome

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Tino Meinen
Op donderdag 30-10-2008 om 13:27 uur [tijdzone +0700], schreef Theppitak Karoonboonyanan: > How is a foot interpreted in your culture? Do you have the same > issue I have met? In my culture, showing foot is considered rude. We have no problems showing our feet in our culture, it's not considered r

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 31.10.2008, 09:56 +0700 schrieb Theppitak > Karoonboonyanan: >> How about this one? >> http://linux.thai.net/~thep/shots/gnome-logo/gnome-ok.svg >> (Sorry, this one is the real ugly.) >> >> Hopefully it's

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Murray Cumming
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:25 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > The problem I've met is a kind of barrier for new comers, as foot is > considered the least respected part of the body in my culture. > It's not that kind of disgust you explained. But it's a sign of strong > disrespect. You shou

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Theppitak Karoonboonyanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sun, 2 Nov 2008 02:10:32 > +0700: > >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > "Theppitak Karoonboonyanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sat, 1 Nov 2008

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:25 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: >> The problem I've met is a kind of barrier for new comers, as foot is >> considered the least respected part of the body in my culture. >> It's not that

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Tino Meinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Op donderdag 30-10-2008 om 13:27 uur [tijdzone +0700], schreef Theppitak > Karoonboonyanan: > >> How is a foot interpreted in your culture? Do you have the same >> issue I have met? In my culture, showing foot is considered r

Re: Cultural Issue with the Foot Logo

2008-11-02 Thread Matej Urban
>> Is showing a paw print in your culture considered rude? > > Not at all. That's normal. > Now, there you have your solution. Interpret the sign as a paw print and not a foot. Tell all new users that the foot is actually a print ant you have no cultural issues. Something similar was suggested few