Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 20:13 +0100, Petr Kovar a écrit :
> Johannes Schmid , Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:40:33 +0100:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which would contain
> > > all modules only intended to be used when the default (gnome-shell)
> > > version isn'
Hi!
> I think that this could be done by anybody who has access to the admin
> interface on l10n.gnome.org, actually. Anyway, are we sure on the modules
> that should be included there? What about gnome-applets, for example?
The modules for the fallback are marked in the jhbuild moduleset
http://
Johannes Schmid , Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:40:33 +0100:
> Hi!
>
> > With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which would contain
> > all modules only intended to be used when the default (gnome-shell)
> > version isn't suitable for a given hardware (i.e. gnome-panel,
> > metacity...)
> >
>
Hi!
> With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which would contain
> all modules only intended to be used when the default (gnome-shell)
> version isn't suitable for a given hardware (i.e. gnome-panel,
> metacity...)
>
> Thus, again helping prioritizing what needs attention first. Eithe
On 06.03.11 14:16, Gil Forcada wrote:
Hi,
I'm sending it on the list first to get a grasp of acceptance ...
Would it make sense to create a fallback set on GNOME 3.0 status pages?
Now we have:
- development tools
- platform
- desktop
With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which wo
Hi,
I'm sending it on the list first to get a grasp of acceptance ...
Would it make sense to create a fallback set on GNOME 3.0 status pages?
Now we have:
- development tools
- platform
- desktop
With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which would contain
all modules only intended to
