Hi, I'm sending it on the list first to get a grasp of acceptance ...
Would it make sense to create a fallback set on GNOME 3.0 status pages? Now we have: - development tools - platform - desktop With my proposal we would add a new one (fallback) which would contain all modules only intended to be used when the default (gnome-shell) version isn't suitable for a given hardware (i.e. gnome-panel, metacity...) Thus, again helping prioritizing what needs attention first. Either in both ways: if you know that in your country most people uses cheap hardware maybe it would be better to first focus on fallback modules instead of gnome-shell and related new modules. Does it make sense? Any +1? :) Cheers, -- Gil Forcada [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network bloc: http://gil.badall.net planet: http://planet.guifi.net _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
