Re: gdm and gnome-session dropped master branch

Le 01.10.21 à 10:39, Alexander Shopov a écrit : На пт, 1.10.2021 г. в 9:44 ч. Ray Strode > написа: hey guys, just a heads up,.gnome-session and gdm now use "main" instead of "master" for their main branches > > Is this handled via vertimus for translat

Re: gdm and gnome-session dropped master branch

Le 01.10.21 à 04:03, Ray Strode a écrit : hey guys, just a heads up,.gnome-session and gdm now use "main" instead of "master" for their main branches Many thanks for the notice, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude -- www.2xlibre.net ___ gnome-i18n maili

Re: gdm and gnome-session dropped master branch

Is this handled via vertimus for translation? Kind regards: al_shopov На пт, 1.10.2021 г. в 9:44 ч. Ray Strode написа: > hey guys, > > just a heads up,.gnome-session and gdm now use "main" instead of "master" > for their main branches > > Ray > ___ > g

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Hi, >> I've done a follow up commit to fix thing up the underlines issue: >> >> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/commit/?h=gnome-2-30&id=9484c04ae87ad725502957ee9e89c72452dddafe > > Looking through the follow up commits from translators, I forgot to > fix up "Keyboard".  I'll do that now. I've done

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Hi again, > I've done a follow up commit to fix thing up the underlines issue: > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/commit/?h=gnome-2-30&id=9484c04ae87ad725502957ee9e89c72452dddafe Looking through the follow up commits from translators, I forgot to fix up "Keyboard". I'll do that now. --Ray

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Hi, On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 à 17:45 -0500, Brian Cameron a écrit : >> Claude/i18n team: >> >> This is regarding the outstanding GDM 2.30.3 release. >> >> Just to follow up, is it possible to have someone from the i18n team >> programmaticall

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 à 17:45 -0500, Brian Cameron a écrit : > Claude/i18n team: > > This is regarding the outstanding GDM 2.30.3 release. > > Just to follow up, is it possible to have someone from the i18n team > programmatically fix the msgid and msgstr strings to remove the > underscore (or

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Hi! > + "Keyboard" > + "Language" > + "Session" > What was the use of the underscores in the first place? Sorry, I don't fully get why they were there and why you would want to remove them. If you just remove it for fixing the appearance for english language than you are not fixing

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Claude/i18n team: This is regarding the outstanding GDM 2.30.3 release. Just to follow up, is it possible to have someone from the i18n team programmatically fix the msgid and msgstr strings to remove the underscore (or the "(_K)" from msgstr for non-Latin languages) for the following strings:

Re: gdm string freeze break (was Re: GNOME 2.30.2 stable tarballs due)

Le mercredi 23 juin 2010, à 11:21 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le lundi 21 juin 2010, à 08:35 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > There is unfortunately still an unresolved string freeze breakage in the > > gdm module. I've written to both the committer (CC'ed) and the gdm-list > > wi

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le lundi 21 juin 2010 à 23:00 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Claude Paroz wrote: >> > Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 09:09 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit : >> >> Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 01:49 +0

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Le lundi 21 juin 2010 à 23:00 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit : > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 09:09 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit : > >> Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 01:49 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit : > >> > This is an automati

Re: [gdm-list] String additions to 'gdm.gnome-2-30'

Hi, On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 09:09 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit : >> Le vendredi 11 juin 2010 à 01:49 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit : >> > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: >> > http://l10n.gnome.org.

Re: GDM string "%x" and c-format in po file

Johannes Schmid writes: > I guess you should file a bug and ping the gdm maintainers. Now filed: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613306 -- Tommi Vainikainen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list

Re: GDM string "%x" and c-format in po file

Hi! > diff --git a/gui/simple-greeter/gdm-clock-widget.c > b/gui/simple-greeter/gdm-cloc > index 9008e6d..b3e6da8 100644 > --- a/gui/simple-greeter/gdm-clock-widget.c > +++ b/gui/simple-greeter/gdm-clock-widget.c > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ update_time_format (GdmClockWidget *clock) > cl

Re: GDM string "%x" and c-format in po file

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:16:06PM +0200, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > Hi, > > I was about to update gdm's translation, and noticed that only change > was string "%x" which was already translated but the old translation did > not have "c-format" marker for msgid. Because this string goes to > strfti

Re: gdm branched for 2.28

Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 11:03 -0400, Ray Strode a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Just a quick note to say I branched gdm for 2.28. > Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Le vendredi 09 janvier 2009 à 09:01 -0200, Leonardo F. Fontenelle a écrit : > Em Sáb, 2008-09-27 às 20:07 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > > Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 14:05 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle a > > écrit : > > > Em Seg, 2008-09-22 às 13:21 +0200, Vincent Untz escreveu: > > > > > > >

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Em Sáb, 2008-09-27 às 20:07 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 14:05 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle a > écrit : > > Em Seg, 2008-09-22 às 13:21 +0200, Vincent Untz escreveu: > > > > > > Note that the new GDM deprecates fast-user-switch-applet, since there's > > > an apple

Re: GDM branched for 2.24

Le lundi 13 octobre 2008 à 17:40 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit : > 2.24 is stable. Development continues on trunk. Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnom

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 14:05 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle a écrit : > Em Seg, 2008-09-22 às 13:21 +0200, Vincent Untz escreveu: > > > > Note that the new GDM deprecates fast-user-switch-applet, since there's > > an applet included with GDM now. > > > > Shouldn't fast-user-switch-applet b

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Em Seg, 2008-09-22 às 13:21 +0200, Vincent Untz escreveu: > > Note that the new GDM deprecates fast-user-switch-applet, since there's > an applet included with GDM now. > Shouldn't fast-user-switch-applet be removed from the GNOME 2.24 release set in Damned Lies? -- Leonardo Fontenelle http://

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Peter: Agreed. The solution you suggest is in the works. By solving the problem in gnome-settings-daemon, the solution should work the same way in both the GNOME session and in GDM, so it will be a huge improvement over what existed before (a GDM-only solution which was typically turned off by

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Brian, Gil, Gil - while Brian cites some specific problems with having all assistive technologies running always by default (especially on new or public systems), the basic concept behind your suggestion is very valid. For example, you don't have StickyKeys turned on by default (where a sing

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Gil: Just thinking about it ... Wouldn't it be reasonable to enable everything the first time the user logs in and the if no accessible technology has been used ask if they have to be turned off by default (and with a little explain about how to re-enable them)? From a usability standpoint,

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Hi all, Just thinking about it ... Wouldn't it be reasonable to enable everything the first time the user logs in and the if no accessible technology has been used ask if they have to be turned off by default (and with a little explain about how to re-enable them)? My 5 cents, El dl 22 de 09 de

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Willie: While I disagree with Brian's assessment (I think he tends to lean more to the 'it's OK as long as an able-bodied sysadmin can configure the system for the disabled user' side than the 'let the user be independent' side), I'll support the decision nonetheless. I wasn't trying to spe

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Brian, all, Do we have a "chicken-and-egg" situation here? Why do all that is necessary in GDM if we don't yet feel that accessibility on the desktop is sufficiently stable to have it on by default from the GNOME community? (so goes one argument) At the same time, if we aren't quite there y

Re: [gdm-list] GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Will: While I disagree with Brian's assessment (I think he tends to lean more to the 'it's OK as long as an able-bodied sysadmin can configure the system for the disabled user' side than the 'let the user be independent' side), I'll support the decision nonetheless. I agree with you that "l

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

While I disagree with Brian's assessment (I think he tends to lean more to the 'it's OK as long as an able-bodied sysadmin can configure the system for the disabled user' side than the 'let the user be independent' side), I'll support the decision nonetheless. Will Vincent Untz wrote: Le lun

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 09:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24. > > > > Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings. > > Entire discussion woul

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24. > > Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings. > Entire discussion would have been less frustrating if gdm developers had > been more responsible to t

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 02:19 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : > The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24. > > Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings. > Entire discussion would have been less frustrating if gdm developers had > been more responsible to the con

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

2008/9/22 Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24. Oh bay, talk about a late notice. Thanks for the info. > > > Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings. > Entire discussion would have been less frustrating if gdm developers

Re: GDM module: dudes on some messages

Hi Andre, Done. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507531 Thanks and best regards, Dooteo Jatorrizko mezua: lr., 2008-01-05 19:34 +0100, egilea: Andre Klapper > Am Samstag, den 05.01.2008, 18:41 +0100 schrieb dooteo: > > Updating GDM (HEAD branch) translation I've got dudes about som

Re: GDM module: dudes on some messages

Am Samstag, den 05.01.2008, 18:41 +0100 schrieb dooteo: > Updating GDM (HEAD branch) translation I've got dudes about some > messages: hi, if you meet English messages which you cannot understand, don't hesitate to file a bug against the application telling the developer of the problem. Please ad

Re: gdm

mån 2007-11-26 klockan 23:39 +0100 skrev Christian Rose: > > "GConf key %s set to type %s but its expected type was %s\n" > > Shouldn't it be "..expected type is %s.."? > Probably. Have you reported it in Bugzilla? > > > "Tue Oct 23 21:16:50 EDT 2007" > > How to translate this? > Good question, pr

Re: gdm

On 11/25/07, Daniel Nylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm currently updated the Swedish gdm translation. > I found these strings who raised some questions > > "GConf key %s set to type %s but its expected type was %s\n" > > Shouldn't it be "..expected type is %s.."? Probably. Have you reported

Re: GDM and translation

Hi, El lun, 05-11-2007 a las 19:14 +0100, Claude Paroz escribió: > Le dimanche 04 novembre 2007 à 21:37 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > > Claude Paroz wrote: > > > > > Can you tell us what has happened to gdm translations? Why has the > > > number of strings been reduced from 898 to 120 between

Re: GDM and translation

Le dimanche 04 novembre 2007 à 21:37 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > Claude Paroz wrote: > > > Can you tell us what has happened to gdm translations? Why has the > > number of strings been reduced from 898 to 120 between gnome-2-20 and > > trunk? > > According to svn.gnome.org, William Jon Mc

Re: GDM and translation

Claude Paroz wrote: > Can you tell us what has happened to gdm translations? Why has the > number of strings been reduced from 898 to 120 between gnome-2-20 and > trunk? According to svn.gnome.org, William Jon McCann branch became trunk/ two weeks ago. Frederic _

Re: GDM branches for 2.20

Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 09:55 -0500, Brian Cameron a écrit : > GDM2 has been branched for GNOME 2.20. Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: GDM branched for 2.18

Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 à 09:22 +0800, Brian Cameron a écrit : > Everyone: > > Yesterday I branched GDM for 2.18, sorry for the late notice. 2.19 > develoment now going on in HEAD. Thanks Brian, l10n.gnome.org shuold be updated soon. Claude ___ gno

Re: GDM branched for 2.18

У Срд, 21/03/2007 у 09:22 +0800, Brian Cameron піша: > Everyone: > > Yesterday I branched GDM for 2.18, sorry for the late notice. 2.19 > develoment now going on in HEAD. What are the plans for next release version? What major changes? > Brian > ___ > g