Re: Testing translations (was: Here we go again *SIGH*)

2009-03-13 Thread F Wolff
Op Vr, 2009-03-13 om 09:45 +0100 skryf Claude Paroz: > Le vendredi 13 mars 2009 à 10:33 +0200, F Wolff a écrit : > > Op Do, 2009-03-12 om 09:55 +0100 skryf Johannes Schmid: > > > Most developers seem to work in "C" Locale anyway or (like me) simply > > > cannot see easily if a string is simply not

Re: Testing translations (was: Here we go again *SIGH*)

2009-03-13 Thread Claude Paroz
Le vendredi 13 mars 2009 à 10:33 +0200, F Wolff a écrit : > Op Do, 2009-03-12 om 09:55 +0100 skryf Johannes Schmid: > > Most developers seem to work in "C" Locale anyway or (like me) simply > > cannot see easily if a string is simply not translated to their locale > > as they added it recently or i

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-13 Thread F Wolff
Op Do, 2009-03-12 om 09:55 +0100 skryf Johannes Schmid: > Most developers seem to work in "C" Locale anyway or (like me) simply > cannot see easily if a string is simply not translated to their locale > as they added it recently or if it's not marked. Hallo Johannes, everybody Please have a look

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-12 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-03-12 klockan 19:58 skrev Claude Paroz: > Please STOP this thread. This does not lead anywhere. Agreed. There is no point in pointing fingers, and there is no point in heating up this discussion since it leads us nowhere. I think we (the Gnome community as a whole) do a really great job: the

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-12 Thread Claude Paroz
Le jeudi 12 mars 2009 à 19:32 +0100, Jorge González González a écrit : > El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 08:29 -0300, Jonh Wendell escribió: > > Em Ter, 2009-03-03 às 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen escreveu: > > > 2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid : > > > > Anyway, of course bug-fixing mostly starts after string fre

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-12 Thread Jorge González González
El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 08:29 -0300, Jonh Wendell escribió: > Em Ter, 2009-03-03 às 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen escreveu: > > 2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid : > > > Anyway, of course bug-fixing mostly starts after string freeze because > > > it's in the last weeks were a lot of polishing happens. > >

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-12 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > If I just "forget" about the procedures I am supposed to adhere to when I use > SVN account, developers will have my head on a plate. If I just "forget" > about the release schedule for GNOME that just means that my translations > doesn't make it in, and the Danish users will suffer. > >

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-12 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
>> The responses from the developers indicate quite clearly that they >> are not satisfied with the methods of string freeze. >> Presently a number of developers, are deliberately breaking the >> string freeze and thereby creating trouble for translators. >> The argument seems to be: "We break stri

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Anna Jonna Armannsdottir
On mið, 2009-03-04 at 14:47 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > It'd be interesting to look at what happened this cycle and > see how much of the breaks had no request (and were for completely new > strings, and not to mark existing strings translatable). Yes, it is probably best to wait and see what hap

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009, à 12:21 +, Anna Jonna Armannsdottir a écrit : > On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > > sign, showing

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: > Personally, I think we're doing quite well for this cycle, with most freeze > breaks happening early in the cycle. It would be interesting to see how many > strings have been changed after the string freeze came into effect, and

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-03-04 klockan 13:21 skrev Anna Jonna Armannsdottir: > On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > > sign, showing that the developme

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Anna Jonna Armannsdottir
On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > sign, showing that the development is active and not dead. Of course, > we > don't want tons of f

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-03 Thread Александър Шопов
Several releases ago I decided that the deadline for my translation work would be the .1 releases. I naturally want to get things done for the .0 releases but distributions are either using .1 or quick to upgrade to it and it is pointless to be overwhelmed with work despite all the joy and pride yo

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 03 mars 2009, à 09:24 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: > > We entered string freeze on February 16 and the following is a > > transcript of my gmail gnome-i18n inbox, ALL of the listed items are > > dated after th

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-03 Thread Jonh Wendell
Em Ter, 2009-03-03 às 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen escreveu: > 2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid : > > Anyway, of course bug-fixing mostly starts after string freeze because > > it's in the last weeks were a lot of polishing happens. > > But some of these are purely cosmetic fixes that developers have had

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-03 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid : > Hi! > > Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: >> We entered string freeze on February 16 and the following is a >> transcript of my gmail gnome-i18n inbox, ALL of the listed items are >> dated after that date. So does string freeze now mean,

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-03 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: > We entered string freeze on February 16 and the following is a > transcript of my gmail gnome-i18n inbox, ALL of the listed items are > dated after that date. So does string freeze now mean, that it is the > point you all star

Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-02 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
We entered string freeze on February 16 and the following is a transcript of my gmail gnome-i18n inbox, ALL of the listed items are dated after that date. So does string freeze now mean, that it is the point you all start fixing bugs at or what? Regards Kenneth String additions to 'glade3.HEAD' S