Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 14:25 +0100 schrieb Frederic Peters:
> > To be honest, if damned-lies could read python syntax this would be
> > fine but I guess it can't and then I think the dummy Makefile.am
> > solution is just as good. None of the solutions are as good as
>
> The dummy Makefile.am
2010/3/6 Claude Paroz :
>
> Well, do you think I would have proposed this if it was not functional?
>
> damned-lies simply parses the files and look for the variable names. But
> the dummy Makefile.am is working as well. As you want...
>
> Claude
Sorry if I assumed a pessimist view, I assumed damn
> To be honest, if damned-lies could read python syntax this would be
> fine but I guess it can't and then I think the dummy Makefile.am
> solution is just as good. None of the solutions are as good as
The dummy Makefile.am has also the advantage of not requiring new
changes to library.gnome.org.
Le samedi 06 mars 2010 à 14:19 +0100, Ulrik Sverdrup a écrit :
> 2010/3/6 Claude Paroz :
> > Le samedi 06 mars 2010 à 13:27 +0100, Ulrik Sverdrup a écrit :
> >>
> >> I was sure the Makefile.am was checked in, but it is not. I'll check
> >> it in and see if that improves the situation. I'm not that
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Ulrik Sverdrup:
> I don't subscribe to this list, but I read Mario's reply in the
> archive, and here is a "reply" to that.
>
> I was sure the Makefile.am was checked in, but it is not. I'll check
> it in and see if that improves the situation. I'm n
2010/3/6 Claude Paroz :
> Le samedi 06 mars 2010 à 13:27 +0100, Ulrik Sverdrup a écrit :
>> I don't subscribe to this list, but I read Mario's reply in the
>> archive, and here is a "reply" to that.
>>
>> I was sure the Makefile.am was checked in, but it is not. I'll check
>> it in and see if that
Le samedi 06 mars 2010 à 13:27 +0100, Ulrik Sverdrup a écrit :
> I don't subscribe to this list, but I read Mario's reply in the
> archive, and here is a "reply" to that.
>
> I was sure the Makefile.am was checked in, but it is not. I'll check
> it in and see if that improves the situation. I'm no
I don't subscribe to this list, but I read Mario's reply in the
archive, and here is a "reply" to that.
I was sure the Makefile.am was checked in, but it is not. I'll check
it in and see if that improves the situation. I'm not that fond of
having a file that we don't even use to explicitly declare
2010/3/6 Gabor Kelemen :
> Ulrik Sverdrup írta:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kupfer has mallard documentation in its master now, so I need help to
>> get the translation status to show up on our damned lies status page:
>>
>> http://l10n.gnome.org/module/kupfer/
>>
>>
>
> I added it on the admin interface, but
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 09:12 +0100 schrieb Gabor Kelemen:
> Ulrik Sverdrup írta:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kupfer has mallard documentation in its master now, so I need help to
> > get the translation status to show up on our damned lies status page:
> >
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/module/kupfer/
> >
> >
Ulrik Sverdrup írta:
Hi,
Kupfer has mallard documentation in its master now, so I need help to
get the translation status to show up on our damned lies status page:
http://l10n.gnome.org/module/kupfer/
I added it on the admin interface, but for some reason it does not show
up on the page a
Hi,
Kupfer has mallard documentation in its master now, so I need help to
get the translation status to show up on our damned lies status page:
http://l10n.gnome.org/module/kupfer/
If it interests anyone, kupfer uses waf so we include very rudimentary
(so far) support for building and installing
12 matches
Mail list logo
