Hi,
I've just branched evolution, evolution-data-server, GtkHTML and
evolution-exchange for GNOME 2.18. New development will happen in the
trunk and bug fixes too (the important ones on the stable branch as
well).
Do join us for the roadmap discussions and plans for Evolution 2.12[1]
on http://
Hi,
I branched the following modules
Evolution
Evolution-Data-Server
GtkHtml [1]
Evolution-Exchange [1]
for the GNOME 2.16 stable series on Saturday.
Thanks for all those who held their patches for HEAD so we could focus
on the patches for 2.8.x. You m
Adding a few relevant details :
1. The request for the freeze break is on Evolution 2.6 branch
(gnome-2-14).
2. It is already available in the trunk.
Correct me if I am wrong.
--Harish
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 04:39 -0400, Sankar(P Sankar) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of fixing http://bugzilla.gnome.o
Forwarded Message
> From: Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: evolution-patches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gnome-doc-list
>
> Subject: [evolution-patches] String change notification in
> exchange-operations plugin
> Date: Mon, 16 J
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:09 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This sounds fine. It is almost always the Friday before the due-date,
> > but I can post a heads-up to gnome-i18n in future.
>
> Actually, this i
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> >However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
> > during the development cycle [2] or have all your huge changes
> > committed at
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:31 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> Umm, why?
>
> How can you possibly be tagging anything but the exact tree that was
> used to build the code against which the testers verified?
>
(sigh) The intention was to tag the exact tree - which is why I tagged
HEAD (which was verified) in
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:18 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> The same problem seems to have occured with mail/ChangeLog,
> mail/default/C/Inbox, and probably by extension any file that was
> changed.
I do not see what is missing in the mail/ChangeLog or
mail/default/C/Inbox on the release tarball or on the
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 23:40 +0430, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> Hi Harish,
> It seems that the HEAD branch was mistakenly used for releasing
> Evolution 2.4.0, at least regarding the translations. The affected
> translations (translated and checked in to the gnome-2-12 branch before
> release but no
hi,
Committed the updated Welcome mail in Evolution. Technically, this
involves no code change but affects translation. Hence, notifying the
doc and internationalization lists.
thanks,
Harish
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://ma
hi,
The gnome-2-12 branch for Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server has been
created. This would be the stable branch for Evolution 2.4 and
Evolution-Data-Server 1.4
For action ahead on HEAD branch, check out
http://go-evolution.org/Evo2.6.
Regards,
Harish
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
