On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Sankar P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated a plugin for Evolution - "external-editor"
>
> Initially this was a experimental plugin and we had to move it to the
> standard list of plugins.
>
> Hence, it involved some new UI Screens and strings (
Hi Federico,
On 10/14/07, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H, are we really string frozen for the gnome-2-20 branch?
Gah, we're still failing somehow. I don't get it. To answer your
question: Yes, ALL freezes remain in effect after the .0 release goes
out *except* for ha
On 9/26/07, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:29 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 20:48 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > (Claude's mail is not reaching gnomecc-list, probably because of
> > > moderation)
> > >
> > > Le lundi 24 septembre 2007,
On 4/17/07, Nickolay V. Shmyrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Now Evince development will continue in trunk. For list of planned
> features see. Mostly we target annotations support and forms
>
> http://live.gnome.org/Evince/Roadmap
Adding gnome-doc-list as per instructions at
http://
On 4/16/07, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've branched GConf for gnome 2.18, so I can commit a string change on
> trunk. The branch is called "gnome-2-18"; I've already switched the
> jhbuild 2.18 moduleset.
Adding gnome-doc-list, gnome-i18n, and desktop-devel-list to the
On 3/27/07, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch attached to bug [1] allows complete translating of
> seahorse's about dialog.
As per http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes
(linked to from http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner, which is
linked to from bug
On 3/19/07, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gnome-vfs, eel and nautilus has branched for 2.18. The 2.18 development
> continues on the gnome-2-18 branch.
Adding gnome-doc-list to the cc list; please don't forget them in
future branching notices (complete list of who should be cc is
On 3/19/07, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SSIA
Adding gnome-doc-list to the cc list; please don't forget them in
future branching notices (complete list of who should be cc is in bold
at http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner, which is linked to from
the bugzilla product overview pa
On 3/19/07, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gnome-control-center module has been branched, so now there is a
> gnome-2-18 branch for 2.18 development.
Adding gnome-doc-list and r-t to the cc list; please don't forget them
in future branching notices (complete list of who should be cc is
On 3/15/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Elijah,
>
> Speaking of branching, what are the plans for Metacity in GNOME 2.20?
Return it to a state of active maintenance, unlike what it had during
the 2.18 cycle? :-)
Hopefully I'm not underestimating the amount of time involved in
mov
On 3/11/07, Carlos Garnacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> #416436 [1] is about marking a non translated string as translatable,
> according to the i18n team rules[2], I do not need explicit approval
> from them, but I guess I still need the hard code freeze approval, sorry
> for being too l
On 3/5/07, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 05 mars 2007 à 16:01 -0300, Leonardo Fontenelle a écrit :
> > l10n.gnome.org still shows statistics for metacity trunk, even if it
> > already branched. Translations committed to trunk after 2007-02-27
> > will not be show in GNOME 2.18:
[Removing some of the cc's; it just looked like too many]
On 1/16/07, Yair Hershkovitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working lately on some bugs with RTL (right to left languages)
> support in Gnome.
>
> I have few suggestions to help improve RTL support in Gnome:
>
> 1) I want to start
On 12/12/06, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
> modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
> the perceived "localizability" of the app, usually untested, but
> judging by the strings in
On 9/4/06, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> control-center has been branched for 2.16 (gnome-2-16 branch). In HEAD,
> new development will start, which includes:
Don't forget to cc gnome-i18n, release-team, and gnome-doc-list in
branch announcements as specified at
http://live.gnome.org/M
On 9/2/06, Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This simple patch makes the gtkspell dependency optional, and removes
> the enable spell-checking checkbox in the Prefrences depending on
> gtkspell's availability.
>
> I could probably just commit this as it basically counts as a build
On 6/20/06, Scott J. Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paolo Bacchilega wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the file-roller module has now a gnome-2-14 branch for version 2.14,
> > HEAD will be used to develop version 2.16
> >
> > Plans for 2.16 are: browse bugzilla and fix bugs.
> >
>
> Bug fixing can be don
On 6/11/06, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/06, Josep Puigdemont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The statistics page for G214 still shows branch HEAD for GOK, while
> branch gnome-2-14 seems to exist. Could it be that GOK has [silently?]
> branched for GNOME 2.14?
>
> /Jose
Hi,
A small issue has come up. Apparently, 'id' has been added to
ALL_LINGUAS in the gnome-2-14 branch of configure.ac for
gnome-screensaver without the accompanying translation -- twice.
Naturally, this breaks the build (see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344432). At John's request,
On 4/25/06, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like I got hit by the same bug in metacity -- no translations in
> the release(s) I made for 2.15.1 and I also applied the po/LINGUAS fix
> from the Gnome Goals so I suspect it's related. But, make distcheck
> i
On 4/25/06, Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Looks like I got hit by the same bug in metacity -- no translations in
> > the release(s) I made for 2.15.1 and I also applied the po/LINGUAS f
On 4/25/06, Rich Burridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need some help.
>
> The tarball
>
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gcalctool/5.8/
>
> I recently generated for GNOME 2.15.1 is broken. It
> doesn't contain and various .../po/*.po files.
>
> I suspect it's an incomplete fix to bug
libwnck now has a gnome-2-14 branch.
We basically branched for now just so we could depend on the newer
intltool (as part of GnomeGoal#2), but other plans for head might
include:
- try not to suck so bad at patch review
- fix handling of group modal windows (as part of a bigger effort to
get t
On 4/14/06, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The subject says it all really...
Don't forget to cc gnome-doc-list. ;) (And I'm pretty sure Luis will
be asking for plans soon as well...)
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
ht
On 4/13/06, Raphael Higino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/13/06, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the three necessary approvals from you, Kjartan, and Luis, I have
> > now committed the patch to the gnome-2-14 branch. I'd like to make a
> >
On 4/12/06, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have your string freeze approval from me. From looking at the
> patch (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=61971) attached to
> the bug report (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326159), it
> seems the only new strings tha
On 4/13/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering before giving an approval: what are the plans in the
> future wrt to this? Do you plan to keep this option? Or do you think we
> can have a better solution?
I believe this patch is the better solution to the strict focus
patches
Hi,
Yeah, I suck. I know alarm bells are going off and this looks pretty
bad. However, the focus behavior for programs launched from a
terminal unfortunately appears to be really badly hated (yes, this
only affects users using a terminal). Ubuntu has already patched it
out (though I'm getting l
Hi,
I noticed a flurry of translation updates to metacity HEAD today after
I made a release from the gnome-2-14 branch. Given the previously
unmarked string newly marked for translation that we announced
yesterday[1], I would have suspected the barrage of updates on
gnome-2-14 but only saw 3. So
On 3/12/06, Satoru SATOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this change included in GNOME-2.14 release?
> If so, I don't think we can update our translations in time although it is a
> tiny change.
Yes, it's a string users are very unlikely to see (only if running an
application remotely), but unfort
On 3/9/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
>
> > With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
> > languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
> > and stabilised at least a week before re
On 3/6/06, Luca Cavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hard Code Freeze is not yet in place (shouldn't it start at midnight
> UTC?) and I understand Sylpheed is not part of GNOME project, but it is
> a quite popular GTK based mail client.
Yes, there's about another 40 minutes or so until hard code f
On 2/18/06, Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Sáb, 2006-02-18 às 09:13 -0700, Elijah Newren escreveu:
> > It appears from a quick glance at the ChangeLog that you have not yet
> > done so, Guilherme.
>
> It was agreed that I would do somethin
Just to quickly follow up...
On 2/17/06, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
>
> Today at 17:13, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
>
> > I have applied this patch after waiting for an answer for a while and
> > getting an OK from the docs team. It can be reverted later on if neede
On 2/14/06, William Jon McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were two minor UI changes that resulted from the review today.
>
> I'd like to commit the patch on the following bug with your approval:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331185
>
> This also involves a string chang
On 2/13/06, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 13:20 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Attached is a patch that makes some minor changes to the S
On 2/13/06, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a patch that makes some minor changes to the SJ UI
> (following a UI review with Calum etc):
>
> * add accelerator labels to main window artist/title/genre fields
> * Use a multiply symbols rather than x in status bar
> * Add
On 2/12/06, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, based on this list I have moved the following modules in the GNOME
> 2.14 translation status from the "proposed" section to the "desktop"
> section:
>
> deskbar-applet
> fast-user-switch-applet
> gnome-screensaver
> pessulus
> sabayon
>
>
I've made a few string changes in metacity with various updates to
metacity.schemas.in. Mostly just comments, clarifications, spacing
fixes, plus a couple of new options (two new double-click-on-titlebar
actions) that aren't exposed in the UI. Since these are only ever
really seen if someone uses
The right-click-on-window-button-in-taskbar menu items have changed to
synchronize with metacity's right-click-on-window-titlebar menu. This
means that the strings
"_Unroll"
"Roll _Up"
have been removed, while
"On _Top"
"Move to Workspace _Left"
"Move to Workspace R_ight"
"Move to Work
Hi,
metacity/src/metacity.schemas.in had some string additions due to a
new pref. The addition is limited to a single short description and
corresponding long description of the new GConf key. It's not a very
user-visible string (I had to grep the .po files to verify that GConf
key descriptions
On 11/14/05, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libwnck has been branched for 2.12. The stable branch is gnome-2-12.
>
> There's no specific plans for HEAD, as far as I know. But maybe Elijah
> has some secret plans?
Uh, try to get Vincent to review the patches that Christian Neumai
On 10/26/05, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I move a function to another file without breaking the translations?
> Can I remove the use of a particular string and replace it with an
> already translated string without using breaking translations?
Christian, Danilo: Could we get a
On 10/23/05, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 23:15 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> > Recently (2005-10-22), there seems to have been a lot of patches
> > causing GNOME 2.12 string freeze breakages in totem.
> >
> > Please either:
> > 1) revert those changes from CVS
Metacity has branched. gnome-2-12 is now the stable branch, and
not-as-stable stuff will go in on HEAD (or the spiffifity or
constraints_experiments branches...)
Cheers,
Elijah
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailm
On 10/3/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gnome-vfs has branched for 2.13. Work for 2.12 goes in the gnome-2-12
> branch.
Don't forget gnome-doc-list... ;-)
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
On 10/3/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eel and Nautilus has been branched for 2.13. 2.12.x work go in the
> gnome-2-12 branch.
Don't forget gnome-doc-list. :-)
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/ma
On 9/19/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am handicapped by the fact that
>
> 1. I do not know what languages I should watch out for - before carving
> out a snapshot for pre-release testing.
> [1] The build verification by the Evolution QA team was done from rpms
> obtaine
On 9/19/05, Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Translators know that if they commit their translations on Monday, it
> > might already be too late for their translations to go in the release.
> > But if you need to make the tarball for the release before Monday,
> > then send an e-
On 9/19/05, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> >However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
> > during the development cycle [2] or have all your huge changes
> > committed at least a day prior to the
On 9/6/05, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, September 6, 2005 16:55, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Thanks Mark. So, um...are the release notes really frozen, or can we
> > remove the paragraph about this issue?
>
> We can remove the paragraph. It won
On 9/6/05, Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 12:51 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > > 2. Splash screen doesn't disappear
> > > I saw something about smproxy possibly fixing some of the splash
> > > scr
On 8/18/05, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While fixing bug #129195, I investigated the possibility of marking as
> translatable the strings in EggRecent, since there weren't.
>
> This would break the string freeze in every program that is using an
> updated version of t
On 8/17/05, Carlos Garcia Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies, I broke the string freeze in this evince commit:
>
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/evince/ps/ps-document.c?r1=1.55&r2=1.56
>
> I wanted to commit ASAP because of the evince release and I forgot that
> it changed some strin
On 8/14/05, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I never ever understood freezes this way. The way I interpreted it
> (and which to the best of my knowledge was never corrected into anything
> else) was that if a freeze was said to begin on a particular date, then
> it was to begin th
On 8/14/05, Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:57 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> > Today at 13:48, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > > All I'm really saying is that I don't think the hard string freeze was
> > > in effect when this change was approved or committed.
Hi,
I committed a patch to remove some duplicate strings in
src/theme-parser.c; bug 309974. Basically it changed
"No \"%s\" attribute on element <%s>"
to
"No \"%s\" attribute on <%s> element"
in 6 places so that we have 14 copies of the latter string and none of
the former. I'm guessing this
On 8/3/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/05, Dragan Sarbut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I am one of the gnopernicus module maintainers.
> > We have a small UI patch in th bug:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308383
> > that we would like to get in CVS
I just committed the patch in
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305331 which will change
some strings related to launching Metacity.
Elijah
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Hi,
I've created a gnome-2-10 branch for metacity (we've only had bugfixes
that didn't break any freezes up until now).
Elijah
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 03:18:13 +0800, Davyd Madeley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without wanting to tell the translators how to do their job. I don't
> see how having the string marked for translation is necessarily a
> bad thing. The string is not likely to ever be user visible, but if
> translators
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:15:47 +0100, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tor, please revert the two string additions,
>
> OK, can do, but see below.
>
> > libbonobo hasn't branched off yet in a "gnome-2-10" branch,
> > this means that the current freeze still affects libbonobo HEAD.
>
>
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:21:53 +0800, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 10:45 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hi Davyd,
> > Its gnome-i18n who approve string freeze breaks.
>
> My bad.
>
> Do I have a second?
String freezes operate differently. You only need
As warned...
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:50:16 -0700, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There were two string changes in libwnck (for the right-click on
> tasklist popup menu):
>
> "Put on _All Workspaces" -> "_Always on Current Workspace"
>
Hi,
There were two string changes in libwnck (for the right-click on
tasklist popup menu):
"Put on _All Workspaces" -> "_Always on Current Workspace"
"Only on _This Workspace" -> "_Only on This Workspace"
see bug 165380. However, I now think "Current" is probably the wrong
word here (it seems t
65 matches
Mail list logo
