Well, I think we are reusing some libs of translate-toolkit (which is
part of pootle).
I know about Debian and Pootle experiment, but I have some concerns
about lowering barriers and not lowering quality at the same time.
Lowering technological barriers is good, you get more people involved,
but
Today at 13:31, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> Where can we poor translators find the POT for HEAD?
(for those ready to live with ocassional bugs, misfeatures, outdated
coordinator info, etc. you may try
http://progress.gnome.org/module/gthumb, and at the same time, report
any problems and/or suggestio
I take care of updating status pages.
Cheers!
El mié, 08-11-2006 a las 16:47 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak escribió:
> Daniel Nylander wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Where can we poor translators find the POT for HEAD?
> >
> > I found the 2.8 revision here, but maybe this page should be
Daniel Nylander wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Where can we poor translators find the POT for HEAD?
>
> I found the 2.8 revision here, but maybe this page should be updated
> with the HEAD revision?
>
> http://l10n-status.gnome.org/HEAD/sv/fifth-toe/index.html
Sorry, Daniel, I'm totally new to th
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak skrev:
> However, version 2.9.0 (from HEAD) has several new strings. Translators,
> please take a look.
Hi Michael,
Where can we poor translators find the POT for HEAD?
I found the 2.8 revision here, but maybe this page should be updated
with the HEAD revision?
http:/
Hello all,
I am hoping to release 2.8.0 (stable) and 2.9.0 (development) versions
of gThumb in the next week or two.
Version 2.8.0 (from gthumb-2-8 branch) should have very few string changes.
However, version 2.9.0 (from HEAD) has several new strings. Translators,
please take a look.
Also, t
One of Pootle's current aim is to improve support for XLIFF. Pootle is
an online translation tool; although offline (e.g. gtranslator) tools
are and will remain very important, I believe an online tool should
lower barriers to contribute and improve translation consistency.
Pootle's documentation
The problem with XLIFF I think there are not enough free software tools
to have a complete globalization stack.
We could use xliff for documentation now, but many of our teams should
learn how to operate with java language tools, (that's the only free
software reliable application dealing with XLI
Thanks for the email/blog responses. Is there a plan to move to Xliff? I
saw this question in one of the blog comments.
regards,
Young
Danilo Šegan wrote On 2006년 11월 07일 오후 04:25,:
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.o
