On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:03, Chris Jones wrote:
> "The very same thing" refers to where you say that disabled users will
> complain if the onscreen keyboard conflicts with sticky keys.
>
> What I am trying to say is that an onscreen keyboard should work
> whether sticky keys is on or not.
By its
"The very same thing" refers to where you say that disabled users will
complain if the onscreen keyboard conflicts with sticky keys.
What I am trying to say is that an onscreen keyboard should work
whether sticky keys is on or not.
Surely an application changing system wide settings just so it ca
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 01:42, Peter Korn wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> One more thing. You write:
>
> > Using the system wide sticky keys means I need to have at least one
> > dialog box when my keyboard starts and is therefore completely
> > unacceptable.
>
> Have you filed an RFE on this issue (seeki
Hi Chris:
I'll try to respond to each of your points in turn:
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 00:51, Chris Jones wrote:
> But this very same thing makes it very awkward who want sticky keys on
> the keyboard and non-sticky on a physical. Which would be true for
> all non-a11y users and some a11y users.
I
Hi Chris,
One more thing. You write:
> Using the system wide sticky keys means I need to have at least one
> dialog box when my keyboard starts and is therefore completely
> unacceptable.
Have you filed an RFE on this issue (seeking a way to invoke the
system-wide Sticky-Keys functionality pro
Hi Chris,
I think there are two issues here. Well, three:
1. Can an on-screen keyboard implement "sticky" modifiers without using
the system support for sticky modifiers?
2. Can an on-screen keyboard circumvent/disable the system support for
sticky modifiers (and slow keys, and...)?
3. Is
But this very same thing makes it very awkward who want sticky keys on
the keyboard and non-sticky on a physical. Which would be true for
all non-a11y users and some a11y users.
In the end though the only manner it interferes with my keyboard is
the annoying dialogue that pops up, and the average
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 22:28, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > In other words I cannot spend the summer making gnome-a11y suitable
> > for my needs. What I need is a temporary work around until after the
> > SoC when I could find time to work on this aspect of gnome-a1
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 23:05, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Bill Haneman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 22:28, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Bill, is it an accessibility violation to have unusable accessibility
> >> tools?
> >>
> >
> > Are you going to say something helpful?
> >
>
Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 22:28, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
>
>
>> Bill, is it an accessibility violation to have unusable accessibility tools?
>>
>
> Are you going to say something helpful?
>
>
OK, I should have resisted that last line, sorry.
But there is a valid poi
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 22:28, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Bill, is it an accessibility violation to have unusable accessibility tools?
Are you going to say something helpful?
:-/
Bill
> - Henrik
>
> ___
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome
Chris Jones wrote:
> ...
>
> In other words I cannot spend the summer making gnome-a11y suitable
> for my needs. What I need is a temporary work around until after the
> SoC when I could find time to work on this aspect of gnome-a11y and
> fix my program so it is not an "accessibility violation".
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 21:43, Chris Jones wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> The system-wide StickyKeys is too inflexible for my needs. I have the
> following gripes:
> * A user might want the onscreen keyboard to be sticky but not the physical.
I am not convinced that users will really want t
Thanks for your reply.
The system-wide StickyKeys is too inflexible for my needs. I have the
following gripes:
* A user might want the onscreen keyboard to be sticky but not the physical.
* It does not allow me to implement the functionality in a way that
is suitable for an onscreen keyboard
The sytem-wide StickyKeys is too inflexible for my needs. I have the
following gripes:
* A user might want the onscreen keyboard to be sticky but not the physical.
* It allows me to implement the functionality in a way that is more
suitable for an onscreen keyboard. One click sets sticky f
Hi Chris:
The answer is, "don't implement sticky keys in your keyboard". You
should be using the system-wide StickyKeys settings and feature instead
(as GOK does).
Interfering with the normal operation of the system wide setting (i.e
clashing with it as your app does), is itself an accessibility
16 matches
Mail list logo
