[g-a-devel] Doubt about AtkHypertext interface

2010-09-28 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi all, I'm currently trying to add support for AtkHypertext, AtkHyperlink and AtkHyperlinkImpl in WebKitGTK and I found the following function confusing: gint atk_hypertext_get_link_index (AtkHypertext *hypertext, gint char_index); According to the docume

Re: [g-a-devel] Doubt about AtkHypertext interface

2010-09-28 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:49 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > [...] > > ..but still, I can't get what the char_index is and what it's used for. > > Consider this paragraph: > > This is a test. > > char_index refers to the offset within the string, thus: > > T h i s i s a t e s t . > 0 1

Re: [g-a-devel] (yet another) Accerciser problem

2011-09-29 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi, On 09/29/2011 12:29 PM, Javier Hernández Antúnez wrote: > [...] > You're not the one, Mario Sánchez reported to me another problem with a > probably related issue, so, Well, my problem seems not to be actually the same one. In my case this is the trace I get: """ /opt/gnome3/lib64/python2.7/

Re: [g-a-devel] (yet another) Accerciser problem

2011-10-01 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi again, On 09/29/2011 08:29 PM, Mario Sanchez Prada wrote: > [...] > For some reason, it starts (apparently correctly) using the GObject > python bindings from /opt/gnome3 (where I install everything from my > jhbuild) but then it bails out of the jail and moves into > /usr/lib6

[g-a-devel] Exposing masked strings for password fields to accessibility

2012-08-10 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi, I recently found out that the text displayed in instances of GtkEntry with 'visibility' set to FALSE (meant to be used for passwords mainly) is not being exposed at all to Assistive Technologies like Orca, which are always getting and empty string, due to code snippets like this one in gtkentr

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification

2013-05-05 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi, Sorry for the *so* late reply, but I'm suscribed to this mailing from my personal mail only and haven't checked this mailing list until now. On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 15:09 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: [...] > So I am here to propose we simplify AtkText and do it *now* i.e. while > we are very e

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

2013-06-24 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. I'd just like to explicitly agree with the plan here. Also, as I plan to continue working on my "removing the dependency on pango/gail from WebKitGTK+" patch this week, I will take this into account already by *not* implementing those deprecated methods and boundar

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

2013-06-24 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
> [...] > Since Orca is the only AT which had been -- but is no longer -- using > those deprecated methods, I'm not entirely sure what difference it > would make from the point of view of ATs. ;) Probably none, just double checking :) > But it's early and Monday, so if I'm missing something (oth

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

2013-06-24 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
> [...] > Right now I prefer a). The main problem with b) is that we would have > three pairs of macros that would mean exactly the same. I'm sorry to disagree here, but I think b) would be better, all things considered, and as long as it's clearly stated that all those _START boundaries are de

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

2013-06-24 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
> [...] > So, taking into account that you are already working on this, I assume > that you would prefer to add the generic boundary now, in order to > avoid two updates of the implementation of those APIs. Right? It's not that I prefer to do that now in order to avoid two updates of the implement

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

2013-06-26 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
> On 06/24/2013 02:26 PM, Mario Sanchez Prada wrote: > >> [...] > >> So, taking into account that you are already working on this, I > >> assume that you would prefer to add the generic boundary now, in > >> order to avoid two updates of the implementation o

[g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 3)

2013-08-06 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi all, Pineiro and me have been holding an interesting conversation about this in the a11y BoF in GUADEC and we believe we have found a better way to move forward here, which would mean not having to deprecate individual elements of an enum nor breaking the ABI at all, while still allowing us to

Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 3)

2013-08-12 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi, > [...] > 2. Add a new function that will only need the offset and the > granularity as input parameters: > > gchar* atk_text_get_text_for_offset (AtkText *text, > [...] Just to mention that after some discussion on bugzilla (see [1]), we are thinking that perhaps a better name for this

Re: [g-a-devel] new states for meter element

2013-12-19 Thread Mario Sanchez Prada
Hi all, I know I‘m late to the discussion, but I would like to show my support for expanding the AtkValue interface. Furthermore, it’s not the first time I found a situation where having a more complete version of the AtkValue interface would be handy (see [1] and [2]), and this element seems l