very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www in
just wondering how can we generate and visualize the system at
300 K with that at 400-500 K? There is a ligand in my system, and it is
expected to escape binding pocket with large loop movement
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://li
scape binding pocket coupled with some big
loop movement.
thank you very much.
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* P
Hello:
I am wondering is double precision supported in current 4.6.1 GPU
version? Otherwise it would be very slow to use CPU version running free
energy calculations
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
sampling answer this question? Or
we should pull the ligand along X,Y and Z three direction so that it is
more convinced?
(2) it is said that when doing free energy calculation in gromacs, we'db
better use double precision Gromacs. So probably we have to use CPU
instead of GPU for this?
thank
Hello:
I am trying to compile gromacs with intel compiler. However, it failed
when I compile FFTW3 with command:
./configure --enable-sse --enable-float --with-pic --enable-single
--enable-static --enable-mpi --prefix=/home/albert/install/fftw-3.3.3
CC=icc CXX=icc F77=ifort
here is the
On 04/05/2013 12:38 PM, Carsten Kutzner wrote:
Hi Albert,
one reason for the error you see could be that you are using a non-Intel
MPI compiler wrapper. I think you need to specify MPICC=mpiicc as well.
Carsten
thanks a lot both Carsten and Justin.
I've compiled both fftw and openmpi
one
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
Hello:
I am trying to run umbrella sampling, the system contains a ligand.
here is the pulling setting:
; Pull code
pull= umbrella
pull_geometry = distance ; simple distance increase
pull_dim= Y N N
pull_start = yes ; define initial COM distance > 0
pull_ngro
calculate.
Obviously, the total charge of the system is -11.0, but genion doesn't
add anything to netural it
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
On 04/05/2013 09:09 PM, Warren Gallin wrote:
Don't you have to give tyne name of the positive and negative ions that will be
added by genion? Otherwise, how would it know?
Warren Gallin
No, it doesn't work either:
genion_mpi -s ions.tpr -o solv_ions.gro -p complex.top -neutral
-norandom -p
Hello:
I saw lots of people is using gromos54a7_lipid FF and I search the
gromacs webiste, but didn't find it. Would anybody tell me where can we
obtain it?
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please searc
On 04/06/2013 04:29 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
And what was your basis for that decision? What makes you think that
AMBER99 can even be combined with the Berger lipid force field?
-Justin
I think he probably read this paper which suggest the combination of
Amber FF and Berger lipids FF:
htt
est
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or se
this
is too short for whole protein as COM?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don
md_pull.mdp -c npt.gro -p topol.top -n index.ndx -t npt.cpt -o
pull.tpr
for pulling .tpr generating. May I ask whey shall we use option
"-t npt.cpt"
in this step? Usually we only need to specify .mdp, .gro and .top file
for .tpr file
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 04/
IC.
thanks a lot for explanations.
Albert
On 04/07/2013 06:08 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
I'm assuming you're getting that line from my tutorial. You pass the .cpt
file to grompp to preserve velocities from the previous equilibration
phase. If you don't, what was the point o
Hello:
I've got two GPU workstation both of which have two GTX690 GPU. Now
I am planning to run Gromacs GPU version and I am just wondering can we
submit a single GPU jobs in one machine and evoke all GPU resources from
both machine?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users ma
Hello:
I am trying to extract last frame of my MD simulations with command:
trjconv_mpi -f s.xtc -s P-in.gro -dump -1 -o p-out.pdb
but it said:
WARNING no output, last frame read at t=751.4
gcq#286: "Oh, There Goes Gravity" (Eminem)
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users ma
rgy through FEP?
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use t
gand, cholestrol,
popc and water. The system contains 1 protein, 1 ligand, 42 chelostrol,
98 POPC and 10079 water molecules. Then I am trying to minimize the
system with command:
grompp_mpi -f em.mdp -c complex.pdb -o em.tpr
However, it always failed with messages:
Program grompp_mpi, VERSION
s not
match topology (topol.top, 51295) "
It is correct with the topology I defined at the end of topol.top file:
[ molecules ]
; Compound#mols
Protein 1
LIG1
CHL142
POPC98
SOL10079
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 04/15/2013 07:45 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
Seriou
1.00 0.00 MEMB
ATOM 6423 H16Y POPA 22 -19.546 21.266 -2.437 1.00 0.00 MEMB
ATOM 6424 H16Z POPA 22 -20.104 19.539 -2.286 1.00 0.00 MEMB
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 04/15/2013 08:03 PM, Albert wrote:
Hello Justin and bv08ay:
thanks a lot for kind
very much
best
Albert
--- Begin Message ---
Hello:
I obtained a POPC lipids from CHARMM-GUI and I found the initial 12 line are
following:
following atom name order:
ATOM 6315 N POPC 22 3.580 -22.614 19.970 1.00-19.29 MEMB
ATOM 6316 C12 POPC 22 4.563 -22.414
very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
of the run time was spent in domain decomposition,
6 % of the run time was spent in pair search,
you might want to increase nstlist (this has no effect on accuracy)
gcq#154: "Rub It Right Accross Your Eyes" (F. Zappa)
Thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mail
Hi Justin:
thanks for kind reply.
Yes, there many atom clashes in CHARMM-GUI system, so I add very
strong force on protein and ligands, and try to minimize the rest of the
system
do you have any idea how can I solve the issue and make it work?
thanks a lot
Albert
On 04/16/2013 07:09
On 04/16/2013 07:28 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
Create a more physically reasonable starting structure.
-Justin
the protein and ligand are already minimized, but CHARMM-GUI create the
mix lipids automatically which I cannot change them.
ALBERT
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
Hello Mark and Justin:
thanks a lot for kind comments.
I changed the atom order in forcecfiled .rtp file so that they are the
same with the output from CHARMM-GUI, and it works fine now.
best
Albert
On 04/17/2013 12:50 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
"Support" is not really the
Hello Brad:
thanks for advices.
I've also solved the problem after I run the 6.1 minimization step in
NAMD. After that, I reimport the lipids system into gromacs, and it no
longer complain those issue.
best
Albert
On 04/16/2013 09:59 PM, Brad Van Oosten wrote:
Hello,I have ha
? Meanwhile
tho job won't have any problem going to next step (I am running all the
steps in one script).
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromac
eaving directory
`/home/albert/Desktop/matpack/source/3rdparty/libpng'
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/albert/Desktop/matpack/source/3rdparty/libpng'
(cd Matutil ; make )
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/albert/Desktop/matpack/source/Matutil'
g++ -ansi -std=c++0x -m64 -DXPM_INCL
and:
mpirun -np 2 mdrun_mpi -v -s md.tpr -c md.gro -x md.xtc -g md.log & >
md.info
but it said:
Invalid null command.
thanks a lot
Albert
On 04/17/2013 05:33 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 4/17/13 11:30 AM, Albert wrote:
Hello:
I found that each time I submit gromacs job in GPU w
On 04/22/2013 08:40 AM, Mikhail Stukan wrote:
Could you explain which hardware do you mean? As far as I know, K20X supports
double precision, so I would assume that double precision GROMACS should be
realizable on it.
Really? But many people have discussed that the GPU version ONLY support
s
On 04/22/2013 01:43 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
There are several options, all external to Gromacs:
https://www.paramchem.org/
http://www.swissparam.ch/
-Justin
did paramchem support gromacs? As far as I know it only export in CHARMM
format.
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx
Dear:
I've installed gromacs-4.6.1 in a GPU workstation with two GTX690.
Here is my step:
./configure --prefix=/home/albert/install/openmpi-1.4.5 CC=icc CXX=icpc
F77=ifort FC=ifort
make
make install
cmake .. -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_GPU=ON -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF
-DCUDA_TOOLKIT_ROO
IC.
it works very well now.
thanks a lot
Albert
On 04/26/2013 08:01 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
You got a warning at configure-time that the nvcc host compiler can't
be set because the mpi compiler wrapper are used. Because of this,
nvcc is using gcc to compile CPU code whick chokes on th
e cap.: 3.0, ECC: no, stat: compatible
why the "-np 2" and "-np 4" are the same efficiency? shouldn't it be
faster for "-np 4" ?
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-us
Hello:
I am going to run gromacs with command:
mpirun -np 4 mdrun_mpi -s em.tpr -c em.gro -v -g em.log -gpu_id #0, #2,
#3, #4
but it failed with messages:
Program mdrun_mpi, VERSION 4.6.1
Source code file:
/home/albert/install/source/gromacs-4.6.1/src/gmxlib/statutil.c, line: 364
Fatal
?
What's more, Eric also shown the GLIC ion channel simulation with
150,000 atoms. E5-2690+GTX Titan can get up to 38ns/day. But he didn't
talked about what's the timestep and cutoff.
could anybody comment on this?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing li
file size is negative? Moreover, my nstxout is very large, I
don't know why the file is so big and no matter how did I change
nstxout, nstvout, the files size doesn't change at all. it always claimed:
This run will generate roughly 2791985478365075968 Mb of data
thank you very m
.
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interfa
).
--
I can continue the jobs with mdrun option "-append -cpi", but it still
stopped from time to time. I am just wondering what's the problem?
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx
em in another GTX690 machine, it also goes
well. I compiled Gromacs with the same options in that machine.
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 04/29/2013 01:19 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
Have you tried running on CPUs only just to see if the issue persists?
Unless the issue does not occur wit
time?
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www in
On 04/29/2013 03:31 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
The segv indicates that mdrun crashed and not that the machine was
restarted. The GPU detection output (both on stderr and log) should
show whether ECC is "on" (and so does the nvidia-smi tool).
Cheers,
--
Szilárd
yes it was on:
Reading file heavy.
Btw, were there any other processes using the GPU while mdrun was running?
Cheers,
--
Szilárd
thanks for kind reply.
There is no any other process when I am running Gromacs.
do you mean I should set GMX_CUDA_STREAMSYNC in the job script like:
export GMX_CUDA_STREAMSYNC=/opt/cuda-5.0
?
THX
A
Hello:
I've got a question about where can be obtain circled lipids bilayer?
like shown here:
http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~ggroenh/membed/vesicle.png
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please s
the problem is still there...
:-(
On 04/29/2013 06:06 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Albert wrote:
>On 04/29/2013 03:47 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
>>
>>In that case, while it isn't very likely, the issue could be caused by
>>some implem
there is only max. 12
water near 6A. However, I found that in almost all my trajectories,
there are at least 16 water from the g_select output. I am just
wondering, is there anything wrong of my defenition in selection.dat?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
b?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the lis
it seems that Gromacs update quite frequently these days..
On 05/30/2013 05:42 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi GROMACS users,
GROMACS 4.6.2 is officially released. It contains numerous bug fixes, some
simulation performance enhancements and some documentation updates. We
encourage all users to u
you have to run 10X times with different random seeds to confirm your
results. Most importantly, you have to do biochemistry mutagenis to
fully support your hypothesis otherwise nobody will believe your
theoretical results
good luck
On 08/08/2012 09:11 AM, Asaf Farhi wrote:
Dear Gromacs user
luck
Albert
On 08/08/2012 08:55 AM, Acoot Brett wrote:
Dear Catch ya,
I have watched the trajectory of the simulation. Besdies, I got the PDb file for the whole 10 ns MD every 500 ps. Then I compared all the PDB files generated, and it confirms that 1 specific residues moves in an extremely
hello:
Does anybody have any idea for the new version? when would it be
reachable? and what's new?
thx
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
hat's new comparing with
current 4.5.5?
thx
best
A.
On 08/15/2012 04:39 PM, Elton Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Albert wrote:
hello:
Does anybody have any idea for the new version? when would it be
reachable? and what's new?
You can always try the current
Dear:
I am going to check the total charge of my system from a gro file. I
am wondering which command should I use? I check the manual and found
nothing for it.
thank you very much
best
A
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
m the POPC real area/lipids which should be something around 64.
Does anybody knows what happen?
thank you very much
best
Albert
here is paramters:
## Input file and input file parameters
bilayereq-withProtein.gro
solventSOL
ionsNA+,CL-
resname
simulation for the pure lipids itself (but
as I saw that few people will did the test with such big protein
inserted in a membrane)?
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 08/19/2012 08:14 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
If you tell GridMAT-MD that there is no protein, it will assign the
"empty"
Dear:
I am going to run a very long time simulation with Gromacs CHARMM36
FF. I am wondering, is single precision compiled version would be good
enough for such kind of purpose or I should use double precision?
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
but GridMAT give me something 72.
I am just wondering is there any alternative methods?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
Hello:
I found that recently both Amber and CHARMM FF have been updated
including CHARMM 37 (or so called c36_aug12 ?)
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/CHARMM_ff_params.html , Amber 12SB, Amber
Lipid FF. Does anybody when those dedicated FF could be avaible in Gromacs?
THX
best
A.
--
gmx-use
HI Justin
thanks for kind reply. Unfortunately I am didn't go that deep of the
FF and probably I am not so qualified for this job. So, I will wait a
little for then.
best
A
On 08/21/2012 08:25 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/21/12 2:20 PM, Albert wrote:
Hello:
I found that rec
satisfied ALP for the membrane/lipids system.
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search befo
On 08/22/2012 07:44 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I don't see how this relates to your claim that you computed a value
with GridMAT that doesn't relate to a value computed some other way.
Mark
HI Mark:
thanks for kind reply.
here is my parameter for for calculation. The vector values was tak
On 08/22/2012 07:44 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I don't see how this relates to your claim that you computed a value
with GridMAT that doesn't relate to a value computed some other way.
Mark
And here is the results. As we can see The values is really low.
However, when I visulizaed the system i
lations.
best
Albert
Ave APL = 50.4388701869839 sq. Ang
protein5.01580.671044407
ResidZ-valueArea (sq. Ang.)
3543.67564.615701
3553.72550.2566296323
3562.9734.4852282957
3574.02852.4928731054
3583.21758.2600273255
3593.8212
y for this since I forgot to
change the box size values but the protein/lipids case is with correct
box size.
best
Albert
On 08/22/2012 02:02 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/22/12 3:16 AM, Albert wrote:
On 08/22/2012 08:23 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
The authors use a 200x200 grid in their
1.jpg
thanks again for comments
Albert
On 08/22/2012 03:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/22/12 9:12 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the
output, I
found the following line:
3684.2953.88400182
On 08/22/2012 03:58 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/22/12 9:54 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still
curious for
the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13 which are
the same
weired to me.
er.
when should we turn this option on?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Sea
hello guys
I am producing MD production. That's really helpful.
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 08/23/2012 08:09 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/23/12 2:06 PM, Albert wrote:
hello :
I am a little bit confused about the difference between gen_seed
and ld_seed.
I checked the m
correct using the following command to append
the jobs?
mpirun -np 144 mdrun -npme -1 -s tuned.tpr -v -f md.trr -e md.edr -g
md.log -o md.trr -cpi -append
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
same system, Core number and
parameters, I can get up to 30 ns/day.
Does anybody have any advices for this issue?
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please searc
you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
body have any advices? how can I solve this problem?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* P
le to continue.
Will the results the same as -append does?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* P
thank you very much.
it works now.
best
Albert
On 09/04/2012 11:06 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 9/4/12 5:03 PM, Albert wrote:
On 09/04/2012 10:59 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
If your files have been modified in some way, you can't use -append.
-Justin
HI Justin:
thanks for kind
hello:
I would like to make statistics for the distance between two helix
(mass center) and I am wondering which command would be helpful for such
kind of purpose?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo
hello:
I've restart my jobs with command:
mpiexec -n 160 /opt/gromacs/4.5.5/bin/mdrun -nosum -dlb yes -v -s md.tpr
-npme 20 -o md2.trr -g md2.log -e md2.edr -cpi
The previous log file is:
log---one---
DD step 11346 vol min/aver 0.540! load
HI Justin:
thanks for such kind comments. I restart the job and it works fine now.
best
Albert
On 09/11/2012 12:50 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 9/11/12 3:11 AM, Albert wrote:
hello:
I've restart my jobs with command:
mpiexec -n 160 /opt/gromacs/4.5.5/bin/mdrun -nosum -dlb y
Hello:
I am wondering does anybody knows how to use CTMD for gromacs
trajectories? In the manual, it only support NAMD but it claimed to
support Gromacs. Does anybody knows how to use it for Gromacs output
analysis?
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
Dear:
I am using command:
g_saltbr -f md.trr -s tuned.tpr -dt 16800
to calculate the saltbr and I found the output is really large:
ls -lt *.xvg
-rw-r--r-- 1 albert users 640869568 Sep 21 09:53 min-min.xvg
-rw-r--r-- 1 albert users 2392154038 Sep 21 09:53 plus-min.xvg
-rw-r--r-- 1 albert
Francesco
Hello :
thank you very much for kind reply.
Is it possible simple restrict the calculation to protein sidechain?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http
s so
that gromacs can assign the correct protonation state for related
residues? Or there are some internal methods in Gromacs for such kind of
purpose?
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please
hello guys:
I am using g_helixorient to analyze the helix property in my system
and it generate three theta[1,2,3].xvg file. I am wondering what's
that? I didn't find any comments in the help file.
thanks
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.g
On 10/02/2012 05:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 10/2/12 11:13 AM, Albert wrote:
hello guys:
I am using g_helixorient to analyze the helix property in my
system and it
generate three theta[1,2,3].xvg file. I am wondering what's that? I
didn't find
any comments in the help fil
IC.
thanks a lot for kind comments.
On 10/02/2012 05:38 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 10/2/12 11:35 AM, Albert wrote:
On 10/02/2012 05:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 10/2/12 11:13 AM, Albert wrote:
hello guys:
I am using g_helixorient to analyze the helix property in my
system and
md.xtc
I also found that the CHARMM36 FF (charmm36.ff_4.5.4_ref.tgz
<http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/184/=charmm36.ff_4.5.4_ref.tgz>)
in gromac website seems to be update, I am wondering is it the latest
CHARMM37 FF?
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.or
output file
nstvout= 5000; Write velocities to output file
nstenergy= 1000; Write energies to output .edr file
nstlog= 1000; Write output to .log file
nsxtcout = 5000
xtc_precision = 1000
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
box, otherwise it is messy when
we visualize in VMD. I am wondering, is it possible to ask mdrun
generate the .xtc file cetering the molecule in PBC box automatically
and we no longer need to use trjconv command to convert it.
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx
://dl.dropbox.com/u/56271062/position.jpg
as we cab see the protein is just in the corner of box and the water
molecules (lefft sphere) in the protein was separate from protein and on
the otherside of box.
THX
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
olve this problem? I try to install
the 64bit VMD, but it crashed as soon as it start up.
thank you very much
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing
On 10/15/2012 08:46 AM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
Depending on the # of atoms, 6000 frames may exceed the amount of ram a 32bit
application can address (4GB). If you're having problems with the 64bit
version, you should probably ask the vmd-l list.
The only workaround other than that is trjconv -skip
, I've removed the output for .trr file, but the g_tune_pme
still generate a .trr file called : traj.trr
I am wondering why it still generate .trr file? is it possible to
disable it generate .trr file? I only need the .xtc file.
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing list
generate a random seed
thank you very much
best
Albert
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe
Hi Saber:
thanks a lot for such kind reply.
How about the second question? I don't find any tutorial for the GBSA
solvent simulation in Gromacs website and I am not sure what kind of
parameters we should use for GBSA.
thank you very much
best
Albert
On 10/17/2012 05:48 PM, saber n
neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
rcoulomb = 999 ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
rvdw = 999 ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
thank you very much
Albert
On 10/17/2012 06:18 PM, saber naderi wrote:
I am no expert in implicit solvent simulations but I think for these
simulations it is
hello Justin:
thanks a lot for kind reply.
I've got another question: how to disable PBC? shall I simply delete
"pbc=xyz" from .mdp file? I found that sometimes if we delete some
parameters from .mdp, gromacs will use the default instead of disable it.
thank you very much
best
07:45 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 10/17/12 1:43 PM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks a lot for kind reply.
I've got another question: how to disable PBC? shall I simply delete
"pbc=xyz"
from .mdp file? I found that sometimes if we delete some parameters
from .mdp,
groma
101 - 200 of 319 matches
Mail list logo