Re: [gmx-users] Re: GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread James Starlight
I've found GTX Titat with 6gb of RAM and 384 bit. The price of such card is equal to the price of the latest TESLA cards. Could it give me better performance in gromacs ? Also assuming that 1 such card need 600 WATT power supply what supply I need for desktop with two such cards? 2013/5/28 Ehud S

[gmx-users] Re: QM/MM simulations

2013-05-28 Thread DavidPO
Thank you. Can you tell me whether there was such a problem in earlier versions? If not, I could use for example version 4.5.7. Because I think it isn't very important at first stage of experiment. Best regards, David -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/QM-MM-s

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs for Non biological systems

2013-05-28 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
Look for my papers. At least, two dozens of them are about non-biophysical stuff. Gromacs can. The question is whether you can provide an adequate Hamiltonian to describe your systems involving Al-surface. Dr. Vitaly Chaban On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Jeya vimalan wrote: > Dear Collegu

Re: [gmx-users] choice of forcefield

2013-05-28 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
In my mind, MARTINI is a decent option to build your particular topology upon. Dr. Vitaly Chaban On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Revthi Sanker wrote: > Dear all, > I am a beginner to performing simulations and my system consists of > protein+ cholesteryl ester +phospholipid and drug. Papers in

[gmx-users] About Compilation error in gromacs 4.6

2013-05-28 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear Justin Thank you for your Previous reply,     I have Downloaded gromacs 4.6 I have configured well using the following command cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/gromacs4.6 -DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DGMX_BINARY_SUFFIX=_d and w

Re: [gmx-users] choice of forcefield

2013-05-28 Thread massimo sandal
What other people do? 2013/5/28 Dr. Vitaly Chaban > In my mind, MARTINI is a decent option to build your particular topology > upon. > > Dr. Vitaly Chaban > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Revthi Sanker >wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I am a beginner to performing simulations and my system co

Re: [gmx-users] About Compilation error in gromacs 4.6

2013-05-28 Thread Mark Abraham
The actual error message is higher up, but my guess would be your compiler in 10.04 is too old to be useful. Per the installation instructions, you will want the latest version of gcc you can get, and ones that came with 10.04 will very likely be wrong or slower than the latest ones. Mark On Tue

Re: [gmx-users] choice of forcefield

2013-05-28 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2013-05-28 14:39, massimo sandal wrote: What other people do? Read literature. Gromacs allows you to choose many. If you need detailed results use an atomistic force field. 2013/5/28 Dr. Vitaly Chaban In my mind, MARTINI is a decent option to build your particular topology upon. Dr.

Re: [gmx-users] About Compilation error in gromacs 4.6

2013-05-28 Thread Szilárd Páll
10.04 comes with gcc 4.3 and 4.4 which should both work (we even test them with Jenkins). Still, you should really get a newer gcc, especially if you have an 8-core AMD CPU (=> either Bulldozer or Piledriver) both of which are fully supported only by gcc 4.7 and later. Additionally, AFAIK the 2.6.

Re: [gmx-users] Lennard Jones parameters

2013-05-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 5/28/13 1:01 AM, Ishwor wrote: Dear all I want to study the simulation of Carbonmonoxide in water. I have seen the Lennard Jones parameters, force constant and partial charges of water in the file spce.itp inherent in gromacs but couldnt get the parameters for CO .I will be pleased if anyone

Re: [gmx-users] Re: QM/MM simulations

2013-05-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 5/28/13 6:03 AM, DavidPO wrote: Thank you. Can you tell me whether there was such a problem in earlier versions? If not, I could use for example version 4.5.7. Because I think it isn't very important at first stage of experiment. I have no idea. Try 4.5.7 and see. If it does work in 4.

Re: [gmx-users] About Compilation error in gromacs 4.6

2013-05-28 Thread Mirco Wahab
On 28.05.2013 13:39, vidhya sankar wrote: cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/gromacs4.6 -DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DGMX_BINARY_SUFFIX=_d please try cmake .. -DGMX_CPU_ACCELERATION=SSE4.1 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/gromacs4.6 -DGMX_DOUBLE=ON -DGMX_BINARY_SUFFIX=_d I remember to have

[gmx-users] About Warnings in Mdrun

2013-05-28 Thread vidhya sankar
Thank you Mirco Wahab and Other Gromacs users   As you Mailed Me I have compiled gromacs 4.6  I have installed using the command As posted in mail But I have AMD 8 Core black Edition When I run the mdrun I saw a warning Note:

Re: [gmx-users] About Warnings in Mdrun

2013-05-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 5/28/13 11:11 AM, vidhya sankar wrote: Thank you Mirco Wahab and Other Gromacs users As you Mailed Me I have compiled gromacs 4.6 I have installed using the command As posted in mail But I have AMD 8 Core black Editio

Re: [gmx-users] About Warnings in Mdrun

2013-05-28 Thread Mirco Wahab
On 28.05.2013 17:11, vidhya sankar wrote: As you Mailed Me I have compiled gromacs 4.6 I have installed using the command As posted in mail But I have AMD 8 Core black Edition When I run the mdrun I saw a warning Note: file tpx version 73, software tpx version 83 Using 8 MPI threads Compiled acce

Re: [gmx-users] choice of forcefield

2013-05-28 Thread Revthi Sanker
Dear Sir, Thank you so much for your reply. To be specific, my system has only four lipid moities- 2 cholesteryl oleates and 2 phosphotidyl cholines. But I was not able to get all atom parameters for these lipids from the lipid book( only united atom parameters were available). So I had resor

[gmx-users] Re: choice of force field -reg

2013-05-28 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
without knowing full details of your simulated system and the goals you pose, I cannot advise anything more definite than I did before. if I were you and my system were yours, I would start with MARTINI FF. I wish you a success in your endeavor. Dr. Vitaly Chaban On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:11

Re: [gmx-users] Re: choice of force field -reg

2013-05-28 Thread massimo sandal
Chaban, why are you advising MARTINI? It is a coarse-grained force field, one should be well aware of the limitations etc. before deciding to choose it, it's not just "another force field". 2013/5/28 Dr. Vitaly Chaban > without knowing full details of your simulated system and the goals you > p

Re: [gmx-users] About Compilation error in gromacs 4.6

2013-05-28 Thread Mark Abraham
That'll likely work, but whether Vidhya wants to use it depends whether he cares about his simulation performance on this machine. Mark On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Mirco Wahab < mirco.wa...@chemie.tu-freiberg.de> wrote: > On 28.05.2013 13:39, vidhya sankar wrote: > >> cmake .. -DCMAKE_INST

Re: [gmx-users] choice of forcefield

2013-05-28 Thread Mark Abraham
You'll still need to do some reading. If your moieties have never been used in all-atom simulations, you'll have a big task of parameterization, or have to accept some approximation in your model. Even if they have been used, you'll want to read up on how they were parameterized and whether they've

Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread Szilárd Páll
Dear all, As far as I understand, the OP is interested in hardware for *running* GROMACS 4.6 rather than developing code. or running LINPACK. To get best performance it is important to use a machine with hardware balanced for GROMACS' workloads. Too little GPU resources will result in CPU idling

[gmx-users] Re: choice of force field -reg

2013-05-28 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2013-05-28 18:09, Revthi Sanker wrote: Dear Sir, Thank you so much for your reply. To be specific, my system has only four lipid moities- 2 cholesteryl oleates and 2 phosphotidyl cholines. But I was not able to get all atom paramters for these lipids from the lipid book( only united atom param

Re: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Broadbent, Richard wrote: > I've been running on my Universities GPU nodes these are one E5-xeon (6-cores > 12 threads) and have 4 Nvidia 690gtx's. My system is 93 000 atoms of DMF > under NVE. The performance has been a little disappointing That sounds like a

Re: [gmx-users] Re: GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, James Starlight wrote: > I've found GTX Titat with 6gb of RAM and 384 bit. The price of such card is > equal to the price of the latest TESLA cards. Nope! Titan: $1000 Tesla K10: $2750 Tesla K20(c): $3000 TITAN is cheaper than any Tesla and the fastest of all N

Aw: Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread lloyd riggs
Dear Dr. Pali,   Thank you,   Stephan Watkins   Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 um 19:50 Uhr Von: "Szilárd Páll" An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" Betreff: Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation Dear all, As far as I understand, the OP is interested in hardware for *running* GR

[gmx-users] arrange the atoms in sphere

2013-05-28 Thread dariush
Hello All, Does anybody have any script to arrange the molecules in the sphere? Actually, I need to set up a LDL (has hydrophobic core and monolayer of PC around). Thanks, Dariush -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/arrange-the-atoms-in-sphere-tp5008599.html Sen

Re: [gmx-users] arrange the atoms in sphere

2013-05-28 Thread rajat desikan
Use packmol. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:32 AM, dariush wrote: > Hello All, > > Does anybody have any script to arrange the molecules in the sphere? > Actually, I need to set up a LDL (has hydrophobic core and monolayer of PC > around). > > Thanks, > Dariush > > > > -- > View this message in cont

[gmx-users] subspace overlap

2013-05-28 Thread Miguel Ángel Mompeán García
Dear all, I am doing PCA on a 110ns run. When calculating the subspace overlap from independent PCA performed in different time windows, I expect the overlap to be 1 only when the time interval is equal to 110ns, since both covariance matrices are identical. However, I found that from the interval

[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 153

2013-05-28 Thread Ayesha Fatima
Compiling GROMACS w CUDA 5.0 problem I did this a few days. i will share my how to do. i used gromacs 4.6.1. assuming u have the nvidia gpu also 1.$ tar xfz gromacs-4.6.tgz $ cd gromacs-4.6 $ mkdir build-cmake $ cd build-cmake $sudo apt-get install cmake $ cmake .. $cmake .. -DGMX_GPU=ON -DCUDA_

Re: Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation

2013-05-28 Thread James Starlight
Dear Dr. Pall! Thank you for your suggestions! Asumming that I have budget of 5000 $ and I want to build gpu-based desktop on this money. Previously I've used single 4 core i5 with GTX 670 and obtain average 10 ns\day performance for the 70k atoms systems (1.0 cutoffs, no virtual sites , sd inte