[Fwd: Re: [gmx-users] VSMP cluster performance changes with time]

2011-08-19 Thread Anupam Nath Jha
I am using 24 processors and it is same for all steps. this is the command in use: tpbconv_mpi -f run.trr -s run.tpr -e run.edr -extend 1000 -o ext_11 nohup /opt/ScaleMP/mpich2/1.0.8/bin/mpirun -machinefile $PBS_NODEFILE -np 24 /opt/gromacs4/bin/mdrun_mpi -v -deffnm ext_11 --

Re: [Fwd: Re: [gmx-users] VSMP cluster performance changes with time]

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 19/08/2011 5:07 PM, Anupam Nath Jha wrote: Is it the problem with the gromacs? Probably not. Assuming you have kept everything else constant, it is likely that other activity on the machine or file system is delaying you somehow. This is still likely to be true. Other activity (other user

[gmx-users] calculate residence time for a protein complex

2011-08-19 Thread aiswarya pawar
Hi, I have simulated a protein complex and now i would like to know the residing water molecules between the protein complex. g_hbond and trjorder helps in giving the number of hydrogen bonds and distance. but is this the residence time calculation. please help me with this. there few posts given

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding generating topology file.

2011-08-19 Thread Bruce D. Ray
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: > I have got some topology and parameter file for some small organic molecules from swissparam in *.mol2 format. > I am trying to generate *.top, *.gro & *.itp files using topolbuild. But I dont know how to do. So can anybody

[gmx-users] -ter option with pdb2gmx

2011-08-19 Thread Vijayaraj
Hello, I am trying to use "-ter" with the pdb2gmx command, seems its not working fine. >pdb2gmx -f -o -ter I also used "-inter" option, its not working. I am using 4.5.4 version. any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, vijay -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://l

Re: [gmx-users] -ter option with pdb2gmx

2011-08-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Vijayaraj wrote: Hello, I am trying to use "-ter" with the pdb2gmx command, seems its not working fine. >pdb2gmx -f -o -ter If this is your command line it is severely broken. I also used "-inter" option, its not working. Please define "not working." It's working fine for me. I

RE: [gmx-users] more than 100% CPU

2011-08-19 Thread Park, Jae Hyun nmn
Thank you so much, all. Jae H. Park -Original Message- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Szilárd Páll Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:19 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] more than 100% CPU It is tru

Re: [gmx-users] use of the mailing list

2011-08-19 Thread Junior Nebeker
Sure Mark. If your interest is in patrolling the Gromacs mailing list, then I'll leave you to it. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > On 19/08/2011 1:41 PM, Junior Nebeker wrote: > > Correct. Other people (who are new to this list) need your help, and > unless their requests

Re: [gmx-users] use of the mailing list

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/08/2011 1:13 AM, Junior Nebeker wrote: Sure Mark. If your interest is in patrolling the Gromacs mailing list, then I'll leave you to it. If you have something constructive to contribute, please do. Otherwise, please don't. Mark -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http:/

[gmx-users] Possible bug in g_hbond with implicit solvent

2011-08-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Hi All, I wanted to solicit some feedback on what I think may be a bug related to periodicity handling and/or implicit solvent simulations. I ran some simulations of a few model peptides (some helices, hairpins, etc) and I got what I believed to be very inflated results for backbone hydrogen

[gmx-users] -ter option with pdb2gmx

2011-08-19 Thread Vijayaraj
"-ter" or "-inter" options of pdb2gmx are working fine with all force fields except amber force field. I cant select the terminal groups when I use amber ff, it directly goes through the generation of top files without asking any options for terminal group selection. I just want to use the none opt

Re: [gmx-users] Possible bug in g_hbond with implicit solvent

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/08/2011 1:26 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Hi All, I wanted to solicit some feedback on what I think may be a bug related to periodicity handling and/or implicit solvent simulations. I ran some simulations of a few model peptides (some helices, hairpins, etc) and I got what I believed t

Re: [gmx-users] -ter option with pdb2gmx

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/08/2011 1:27 AM, Vijayaraj wrote: "-ter" or "-inter" options of pdb2gmx are working fine with all force fields except amber force field. I cant select the terminal groups when I use amber ff, it directly goes through the generation of top files without asking any options for terminal grou

Re: [gmx-users] Possible bug in g_hbond with implicit solvent

2011-08-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Mark Abraham wrote: On 20/08/2011 1:26 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Hi All, I wanted to solicit some feedback on what I think may be a bug related to periodicity handling and/or implicit solvent simulations. I ran some simulations of a few model peptides (some helices, hairpins, etc) and

[gmx-users] g_rdf

2011-08-19 Thread Nilesh Dhumal
Hello, I run a 5ns simulation for a single glucose molecule in gas phase. I tried to plot radial distribution function for O---H intramolecular interactions using following command. g_rdf -f 6.trr -s 6.tpr -n index -o In rdf.xvg file there is no data. Can you tell what could be the reason. I

[gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-19 Thread KONG Xian
I have sent this email days ago, but I got no answer. Hope someone would saw it this time. Sorry for disturbing. Dear all: I am using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure to calculate the local pressure of my system. I have a question. When rerun the mdrun from gromacs-4.0.

Re: [gmx-users] g_rdf

2011-08-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Nilesh Dhumal wrote: Hello, I run a 5ns simulation for a single glucose molecule in gas phase. I tried to plot radial distribution function for O---H intramolecular interactions using following command. g_rdf -f 6.trr -s 6.tpr -n index -o In rdf.xvg file there is no data. Can you tell what

Re: [gmx-users] Possible bug in g_hbond with implicit solvent

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/08/2011 1:45 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Mark Abraham wrote: On 20/08/2011 1:26 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Hi All, I wanted to solicit some feedback on what I think may be a bug related to periodicity handling and/or implicit solvent simulations. I ran some simulations of a few mo

[gmx-users] parameters for CH1 -- S -- CH2 ?

2011-08-19 Thread Yun Shi
Hi all, I have a small molecule with a part like: CH1 --- CH1 --- S --- CH2 --- CH1 | CH1 I first tried PRODRG, and it turned out PRODRG assigned bond, angle, and dihedral parameters according what are already present in the gromos53a6.ff/ffbonded.itp file. Since this f

Re: [gmx-users] parameters for CH1 -- S -- CH2 ?

2011-08-19 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/08/2011 1:57 AM, Yun Shi wrote: Hi all, I have a small molecule with a part like: CH1 --- CH1 --- S --- CH2 --- CH1 | CH1 I first tried PRODRG, and it turned out PRODRG assigned bond, angle, and dihedral parameters according what are already present in the gro

Re: [gmx-users] the mdp parameters for localpressure calculation using gromacs-4.0.2_localpressure

2011-08-19 Thread Amit Choubey
during local pressure calculation. > > > ** ** > > Thanks for any reply. > > ** ** > > Best wishes, > > KONG Xian > > Tsinghua, Beijing, China**** > > > > > > > __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ver

Re: [gmx-users] use of the mailing list

2011-08-19 Thread Amit Choubey
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Junior Nebeker wrote: > Sure Mark. If your interest is in patrolling the Gromacs mailing list, > then I'll leave you to it. > I think before you type your response you should consider that Mark has helped several hundred times over this mailing list. > On Thu,

[gmx-users] h-bonds constraints

2011-08-19 Thread Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
What criterion does the grompp utility use to identify H-atoms when it is requested in the MDP file to apply constraints=h-bonds? Thanks. -- Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban, 430 Hutchison Hall, Chem. Dept. Univ. Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0216 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -- gmx-users mailing lis

Re: [gmx-users] h-bonds constraints

2011-08-19 Thread Bogdan Costescu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 20:02, Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban wrote: > What criterion does the grompp utility use to identify H-atoms when it > is requested in the MDP file to apply constraints=h-bonds? Thanks. Any atom name starting with H or h (so case-insensitive). Cheers, Bogdan -- gmx-users mailing

Re: [gmx-users] h-bonds constraints

2011-08-19 Thread Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
Thanks! That's reasonable. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 20:02, Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban > wrote: >> What criterion does the grompp utility use to identify H-atoms when it >> is requested in the MDP file to apply constraints=h-bonds? Thanks. > >

Re: [gmx-users] use of the mailing list

2011-08-19 Thread Junior Nebeker
Of course I know of Mark's contributions. However, one's contributions, big or small, shouldn't excuse him/her from being rude to others. That's my constructive feedback - take it or leave it. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Amit Choubey wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Junior Ne

[gmx-users] NPT - density off

2011-08-19 Thread Elisabeth
Dear experts, I am intending to calculate the equilibrium density of a pure hydrocarbon at different pressures , at 425 K. The normal boiling point of the liquid is around 350 K. For pressures below 100 bar densities I am getting from NPT is in accurate. I start form a structure which is compresse

Re: [gmx-users] NPT - density off

2011-08-19 Thread wibke . sudholt
Dear Email Sender, Thank you very much for contacting me! Unfortunately, I am not available in the office at the moment and cannot respond to your email. I will be able to handle your request starting again Monday, August 22, 2011. For all questions about CloudBroker and the CloudBroker Platfor

Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS with GPU

2011-08-19 Thread Jones de Andrade
Hi! If I may ask, but what is the gromacs version that is planned on the roadmap to begin to work with the newer version of openmm? Specially interested due to ATI support Regards Jones On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote: > Hi, > > Gromacs 4.5.x works only with OpenMM 2.x. Yo