Thank you so much, all. Jae H. Park
-----Original Message----- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Szilárd Páll Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:19 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] more than 100% CPU It is true that on Intel CPUs with HT supported and on you get an up to 10-15% speedup if you also use all virtual cores wrt to running only as many threads as real cores. Additionally, as the OS reports all virtual processors, by Gromacs will use all of them by default, i.e. will run with 8 threads on a 4-core CPU with HT. However, this is not the case on AMD and other CPU without simultaneous multithreading. There you'll loose performance if you overload CPUs. -- Szilárd On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:52 AM, <chris.ne...@utoronto.ca> wrote: > Slightly off-topic, but for all but the smallest systems, I get a further > 10% efficiency by running a 16-process mpi job on an 8-core machine. I > suspect that the story is the same with threads. Thus, on a 16-core node, > you could try starting 32 threads. Note that this will report a 2x larger > "efficiency" as you were discussing before, but by checking the ns.day you > will see that the benefit is between 5% and 16% > > Chris. > > It means you are running a lot of parallel processes, but that does not > translate into a linear increase in speed. So faster, but not 16X. > > Warren Gallin > > On 2011-08-18, at 5:36 PM, Park, Jae Hyun nmn wrote: > >> Thank you, Warren. >> Does that mean 16 times faster ? >> >> Jae H. Park >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at >> gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Warren Gallin >> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 7:26 PM >> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users >> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] more than 100% CPU >> >> I believe that the current version of GROMACS supports threading, which >> does not require mpi. >> >> So mdrun is running threads at 100% of the activity of each of your 16 >> nodes, hence 1600%. >> >> Warren Gallin >> >> On 2011-08-18, at 5:19 PM, Park, Jae Hyun nmn wrote: >> >>> Hi GMX users, >>> >>> I installed GMX 4.5.3 recently. >>> But, when I just execute mdrun (without mpi, I did not installed >>> mpi-version of mdrun), the use of CPU appears more than 100% ("top" command >>> in LINUX). How is it possible? >>> For example, I am using 16-node machine. And if I simply run "mdrun", >>> then use of CPU is 1600%!!. >>> The simulation runs well and the results looks reasonable. >>> Is there anybody who can teach me what is happening? I would deeply >>> appreciate. >>> > > > -- > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org > hxxp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users > Please search the archive at > hxxp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww interface > or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. > Can't post? Read hxxp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org hxxp://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at hxxp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read hxxp://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
