Hey hi
i want to do gromacs tutorial and for that i required the .mdp file for where i
can get that file and what type of modification should i do in that file
With Best Regards.
Mr.Manoj Damale,
M.S. Pharma (Pharmacoinformatics) NIPER,
Kolkata, West Bengal State,
India.--
gmx-users mailin
On 9/08/2011 5:26 PM, manoj damale wrote:
Hey hi
i want to do gromacs tutorial and for that i required the .mdp file
for where i can get that file
The tutorial will tell you how to get it or create it.
and what type of modification should i do in that file
Whatever the tutorial suggests
Dear Mark,
Excellent suggestion, i'll also follow it to be a good gromacs
user. Perhaps reading books, literature, searching on-line resources, go
through tutorial or manual is always evergreen idea, but a bit hard work
needed (To be an expert).
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards
sharma
On T
Hi,
I used thermodynamics integration method (TI) to obtain delta Gibbs energy
of the protein membrane. I want to separate contributions of delta bonding
and nonbonding energy in delta Gibbs energy.
Best wishes,
Maleki,
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs
Dear All,
For verification purposes, I would like to obtain in a readable format the
list of the pairtypes values for a molecule generated by grompp when the
gen-pairs directive is set to "yes" in forcefield.itp file. It is possible
? If yes, how?
Thank you in advance for your response
On 9/08/2011 9:13 PM, afsaneh maleki wrote:
Hi,
I used thermodynamics integration method (TI) to obtain delta Gibbs
energy of the protein membrane. I want to separate contributions of
delta bonding and nonbonding energy in delta Gibbs energy.
So instead of using the sum of bonded and non-
On 9/08/2011 10:23 PM, intra\sa175950 wrote:
Dear All,
For verification purposes, I would like to obtain in a readable format
the list of the pairtypes values for a molecule generated by grompp
when the gen-pairs directive is set to "yes" in forcefield.itp file.
It is possible ? If yes, how
I want to calculate secondary structure propensities of residues.
Following Mark's message on thread
Re: [gmx-users] secondary structure propensities of residues
I would like to get the release-4.5-patches from git (in order to get
do_dssp.c). Nevertheless I found problems while trying to fetch
gt; Thank you in advance for your response
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20110809/53fb7878/a
ttachment-0001.html
--
Message: 5
Date:
Hi all,
I want to do MD simulation with amber99SB force field, which I found
originally developed using SHAKE algorithm to constrain all bonds involving
hydrogen atoms. But it seems to me that SHAKE is still not supported with
domain decomposition in GROMACS4.5.4, and we can only use LINCS for bon
Thank you Mark for the commands. It is indeed what I want.
Stephane
> On 9/08/2011 10:23 PM, intra\sa175950 wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > For verification purposes, I would like to obtain in a readable format
> > the list of the pairtypes values for a molecule generated by grompp
> > when th
Hi,
please try "git pull" (for repo.or.cz) and than redo the checkout. I
accidentally deleted the release-4-5-patches branch. But it is back and it
should work. If it does not work please run "git branch -r" and post the
result.
BTW: The error message you get for git.gromacs.org suggests that you
Yun Shi wrote:
Hi all,
I want to do MD simulation with amber99SB force field, which I found
originally developed using SHAKE algorithm to constrain all bonds
involving hydrogen atoms. But it seems to me that SHAKE is still not
supported with domain decomposition in GROMACS4.5.4, and we can
Hi,
I'm trying to use umbrella pulling to do a targeted MD and I have the following
pull code:
pull= umbrella
pull_geometry = distance
pull_dim= N N Y
pull_start = no
pull_ngroups = 1
pull_group0 = REF
pull_group1 = PULL
pull_init1
Thanks Justin.
Best regards,
Fabian
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Fabian Casteblanco
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am setting up a free energy calculation (drug from full coulomb+vdW
> in solution --> drug with only vdW in solution --> dummy drug in
> solution).
>
> After reading most of the paper
Dear User:
I compiled GROMACS with OPEN64 without problems, Now I want to compile it
using the ACML libraries to compare the performance
How I can compile gromacs using the ACML libraries?
I tried:
./configure CC=opencc CXX=openCC F77=openf90 CFLAGS="-O3 -OPT:Ofast
-march=barcelona -LGROMACS_SUI
LinkedIn
MING LI requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Chinmay,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- MING
Accept invitation from MING LI
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-85v1n9-gr58nre7-5n/Xl9gjr6G
LinkedIn
MING LI requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Chinmay,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- MING
Accept invitation from MING LI
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-85v1n9-gr58q7r2-6w/Xl9gjr6G
Hi,
I downloaded release-4-5-patches from git. It compiles and installs
successfully. Nevertheless I am getting a segmentation fault.
With gdb I am getting the following messages
gdb --args do_dssp -f ../0_trajout.xtc -s ../input/replica_0.tpr -ssdump
data.dat -b 17 -e 18 -dt 10
GNU gdb (
Dear Mark,
I used thermodynamics integration method (TI) to obtain delta Gibbs energy
of the protein membrane with dual topology.
topology A (lambda=0) to topology B (lambda=1)
What i obtained after using mdrun command to calculate free energy is
dgdl.xvg that contain dV(total)/dlamda via time. I
Thank you for the reply. Just to clarify.
In the original gromos 53a6 paper, all bonds were constrained, while in
amber99sb paper only bonds involving H atoms were constrained. So as long as
I stick to the same groups of bonds constrained as in the development of
respective forcefields, it is alwa
afsaneh maleki wrote:
Dear Mark,
I used thermodynamics integration method (TI) to obtain delta Gibbs
energy of the protein membrane with dual topology.
topology A (lambda=0) to topology B (lambda=1)
What did you alter between these two topologies? Nonbonded terms (atom types
and/or ch
Yun Shi wrote:
Thank you for the reply. Just to clarify.
In the original gromos 53a6 paper, all bonds were constrained, while in
amber99sb paper only bonds involving H atoms were constrained. So as
long as I stick to the same groups of bonds constrained as in the
development of respective f
Hello,
I have done PCA using cartesian coordinates by the help of
gromacs(g_covar and g_anaeig),
then using the 2-d projection of trajectory on first two eigenvectors
as reaction coordinates,I have calculated a 2-d representation of the
gibbs free energy landscape using gromacs.Now
on this landscap
Hi Gromacs Users,
I am using the gromacs analysing tools to analyze my DCD file produced by
NAMD. I set up the VMD_PLUGIN_PATH before running however I got the error
that the VMD_PLUGIN_PATH was not set up. Can anyone give me a hand? Please
see below the details. Thanks for the help
export VMD_PL
Dear all,
Could you please tell me what kind of error limit is accepted
for running NVT and NPT equilibration in terms of Temperature, Pressure and
Density.
Thank you,
With Regards,
Ravi Kumar V
IPC Dept.,
IISc, INDIA.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists
26 matches
Mail list logo