Dear gmx-users,
I am wondering whether or not there is a good reason to use flex_spc during
energy minimisation and spc during production run? I guess one would not use
flex_spc during a production run as this would decrease the time step needed
quite a lot - but is it a good idea to use durin
Hi,
flex_spc is not a reliable water model, never use it for MD.
You should only use it when your initial configuration is so bad that energy
minimization with normal, rigid water molecules crashes.
However, the deviations are so small that after a few picoseconds of MD
with normal spc there will
Thank you very much for your quick answer Berk!
Fra: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org på vegne af Berk Hess
Sendt: ma 15-02-2010 10:56
Til: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Emne: RE: [gmx-users] spc vs. flex_spc
Hi,
flex_spc is not a reliable water model, never u
Hi all,
I am trying to translate the peptide within the simulation box. I have a box
with dimensions of 3.8 3.0 3.0 nm^3, and I want to put the peptide on top of
the box. In order to that I used the following command line:
editconf -f pep.pdb -box 3.8 3.0 3.0 -translate 0 0 1.5 -o trans.pdb
The
Ozge Engin wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to translate the peptide within the simulation box. I have a
box with dimensions of 3.8 3.0 3.0 nm^3, and I want to put the peptide
on top of the box. In order to that I used the following command line:
editconf -f pep.pdb -box 3.8 3.0 3.0 -translate 0
Ozge Engin skrev:
Hi all,
I am trying to translate the peptide within the simulation box. I have
a box with dimensions of 3.8 3.0 3.0 nm^3, and I want to put the
peptide on top of the box. In order to that I used the following
command line:
editconf -f pep.pdb -box 3.8 3.0 3.0 -translate 0
Hi All,
I'm trying to d.lzm gromacs benchmarks with 64 node machine, but dynamic
load balancing performance is very low.
Any suggestion will be of great help.
Thanks.
Deniz KARASU
Log file opened on Sat Feb 13 17:23:37 2010
Host: d077.uybhm.itu.edu.tr pid: 20157 nodeid: 0 nnodes: 64
The
Hi everyone,
I'm using this command to extract my protein and my ligand from the
trajectory.
trjconv -f prot_md60ns.xtc -s prot_md50.tpr -fit rot+trans -pbc whole -n
prot_wat.ndx -o prot_ligand_60ns.xtc < grps >& outtrj
Before, I had a problem with residues of my protein showing at the other end
Carla Jamous wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm using this command to extract my protein and my ligand from the
trajectory.
trjconv -f prot_md60ns.xtc -s prot_md50.tpr -fit rot+trans -pbc whole -n
prot_wat.ndx -o prot_ligand_60ns.xtc < grps >& outtrj
Before, I had a problem with residues of my prote
Hi,
18 seconds real time is a bit short for such a test. You should run
at least several minutes. The performance you can expect depends
a lot on the interconnect you are using. You will definitely need a
really low-latency interconnect if you have less then 1000 atoms
per core.
Carsten
On Fe
Hi all,
I am doing some simulations in binary solvent water and DMSO using ffG43a6
forcefield. I need to calculate the composition fluctuation of the solvent.
I have done that with hand-written codes using the trajectory files
generated by GROMACS. I selected a sphere at a fixed center and noted t
Saikat Banerjee wrote:
Hi all,
I am doing some simulations in binary solvent water and DMSO using
ffG43a6 forcefield. I need to calculate the composition fluctuation of
the solvent. I have done that with hand-written codes using the
trajectory files generated by GROMACS. I selected a sphere
Thank you so much! I appreciate the help, and the good news is actually
great news.
Jenny
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Jochen Hub wrote:
> Jennifer Casey wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to create a PMF for the sodium cation and iodine anion in the
>> presence of THF. I have been fol
Hi , please answer my questions
1- for performed (MD)
simulation to study adsorption gas on silicon
nanotube ,I used from g_rdf and trjorder programs ,how I can measure
adsorption coverage (number of adsorbed gas)on surface of the nanotube ?
2-while running g_msd program ,in
the option select
What
is coordination number and which program
generate it?
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the l
>
>
> Saikat Banerjee wrote:
>> I am doing some simulations in binary solvent water and DMSO using ffG43a6
>> forcefield. I need to calculate the composition fluctuation of the solvent.
>> I have done that with hand-written codes using the trajectory files
>> generated by GROMACS. I selected a sp
Hello,
I want to study polymer adsorption onto a surface. To do so, I create
a polymer-solvent system with a wall at z = 0 and use pbc = xy. This,
however makes the system infinite in the z-direction. I was wondering if
there was a way to create a periodic boundary at z = L such that when a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 19:04, Saikat Banerjee wrote:
> I selected a sphere at a fixed center and noted the
> number of water and DMSO molecules within that cut-off. I would like to know
> if there are any methods to do the same within GROMACS.
The development (git) version of Gromacs has fo
Turtle Nedasing wrote:
Hi , please answer my questions
1- for performed (MD) simulation to study adsorption gas on silicon
nanotube ,I used from g_rdf and trjorder programs ,how I can measure
adsorption coverage (number of adsorbed gas)on surface of the nanotube ?
Using g_dist -dist migh
Turtle Nedasing wrote:
What is coordination number and which program generate it?
That depends on your context, and there probably isn't a Gromacs program that
generates it magically, but with a combination of tools to describe whatever
criteria you're assigning, you might be able to ge
Hi Everyone,
I changed the gromacs source code a little bit and this change introduced
some bias along x direction. Now i want to do a 'yz' pbc but gromacs has the
option of pbc = xy only. Is there a quick tip to circumvent? I can always
introduce the bias along z but its a little time taking job
On 02/16/10, Amit Choubey wrote:Hi Everyone,I changed the gromacs source code a little bit and this change introduced some bias along x direction. Now i want to do a 'yz' pbc but gromacs has the option of pbc = xy only. Is there a quick tip to circumvent? I can always introduce the bias along z b
Shalom all,
I am simulating a protein in which one of the residues is chemically
modified (non-natural) - so I had to add it into aminoacids.dat.
I found that when I analyse my results, and use the index group of the
protein this amino acid does not count unless the aminoacids.dat file is
availab
On 02/16/10, Itamar Kass wrote:Shalom all,I am simulating a protein in which one of the residues is chemicallymodified (non-natural) - so I had to add it into aminoacids.dat.I found that when I analyse my results, and use the index group of theprotein this amino acid does not count unless the ami
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the replay. I actually hold the modified force filed files in
the same directory in which I simulate, less mess in the system.
Cheers,
Itamar
--
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in
practice, there is." - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
=
Dear All,
It is not clear from manual how to analyse my requirements after simulation.
Could you please help me in the following regards:
1> How to get the graph on "occupancy of hydrogen bond interactions of
ligands throughout 5 ns simulation" and "occupancy of a particular
salt-bridge throug
26 matches
Mail list logo