Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-05-02 Thread Berk Hess
From: "merc mertens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:00:11 +0200 hello, you are right but "summing" over 1 term was done only fo

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-30 Thread merc mertens
"Berk Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: gmx-users@gromacs.org Betreff: Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum > Hi, > > Well there is something special, in the sense that the sum is over > just one term, so summing does not make much sense. > But also in that case it should w

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread Berk Hess
users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:41:11 +0200 Hi, If you haven't done anything special such as concatenating or cutting the energy file in parts after the simulation, I'd say it looks like a bug. Please create an entry at bugzilla.gromacs.org , uplo

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread Erik Lindahl
4000.00 -1129.730713 i think that the ener.edr only should contain only those steps listed in the xvg. cheers, merc Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:04:04 +0200 Von: Erik Lindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Discussion list for GROMACS users Betreff: Re: [gmx

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread merc mertens
r.edr only should contain only those steps listed in the xvg. cheers, merc Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:04:04 +0200 Von: Erik Lindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Discussion list for GROMACS users Betreff: Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum > Oops, > > S

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread Erik Lindahl
Oops, Sometimes it helps to read the mail. Mea culpa - forget my previous answer, this is something else. It could simply be a bug in g_energy; which version are you using, and what do you get if you remove "-b 2000" (i.e. include all steps)? Cheers, Erik On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:24 PM, m

Re: [gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi, On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:24 PM, merc mertens wrote: the average energies from the log and the xvg do not match. does anybody know what is wrong here? thank you in advance, Nothing wrong. The statistics reported to stdout by g_energy is based on values from _all_ steps in the simulatio

[gmx-users] g_energy sum

2007-04-27 Thread merc mertens
hello, when i calculate energies with g_energy -f (ener.edr) -b 2000 -sum -o (energy.xvg) e.g. i get this average in the log: Statistics over 101 steps [ 2000. thru 4000. ps ], 1 data sets Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift Tot-Drift