[gmx-users] Re: starting temperature equilibration phase

2013-08-07 Thread ypca
I was trying to calculate rmsd for minimized structures in vmd, and when I choose all the residues of the protein it gave a very high value (16 angstron), that makes no sense with the alignment of both structures. I'm so sorry, i made a confusion and asked like a problem in gromacs. Thank you ver

Re: [gmx-users] Re: starting temperature equilibration phase

2013-08-07 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/7/13 2:36 PM, ypca wrote: Thank you very much for the answers Justin. I also would like to know if i could calculate RMSD for backbone and side chains without the hydrogens atoms, is it possible? Of course. Please refer to basic tutorial material and read in the manual about index gr

[gmx-users] Re: starting temperature equilibration phase

2013-08-07 Thread ypca
Thank you very much for the answers Justin. I also would like to know if i could calculate RMSD for backbone and side chains without the hydrogens atoms, is it possible? -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/starting-temperature-equilibration-phase-tp5010365p501

Re: [gmx-users] Re: starting temperature equilibration phase

2013-08-06 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/6/13 2:45 PM, ypca wrote: Thank you for the help! I can completely understand you, but what about the simulated annealing, isn't it automatically for all systems? No. If you want to perform simulated annealing, use simulated annealing options (see the manual). Why the increase of te

[gmx-users] Re: starting temperature equilibration phase

2013-08-06 Thread ypca
Thank you for the help! I can completely understand you, but what about the simulated annealing, isn't it automatically for all systems? Why the increase of temperature is so fast, like in lysozyme tutorial (http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/lysozyme/06_equil.h