[gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread pavithrakb
Thank you so much sir. the entire thread was highly useful. -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/problem-in-g-membed-tp5009503p5010188.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org h

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/13 9:03 PM, pavithrakb wrote: I would have made a blunder by selecting the POPE membrane. But, that paper (one which used POPE for human protein) was published in ACS-Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. I thought following high standard papers are trust worthy. Thank you so mu

[gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread pavithrakb
I would have made a blunder by selecting the POPE membrane. But, that paper (one which used POPE for human protein) was published in ACS-Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. I thought following high standard papers are trust worthy. Thank you so much sir. I will start learning the basics

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/13 9:10 AM, pavithrakb wrote: sir, the reason for selecting POPE doesn't have much valid reason. I mean, I have referred previous works and in the recent work they have used POPE membrane for my protein (the exact protein) simulation. I have searched literature on selecting a membrane f

[gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread pavithrakb
sir, the reason for selecting POPE doesn't have much valid reason. I mean, I have referred previous works and in the recent work they have used POPE membrane for my protein (the exact protein) simulation. I have searched literature on selecting a membrane for simulation to know/understand why they

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/13 4:31 AM, pavithrakb wrote: Thank you both of you (Justin and Albert) sir. Initially I was using dppc128 and now I changed to POPE 340 and still my protein (its a GPCR protein) protrude out of the membrane (the same region; two amino acids). Out of curiosity, why have you chosen POP

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread Albert
superimpose your receptor PDB files with related structure OPM database center your lipids in 0 by editconf command in gromacs then you GPCR would be in the center of the lipids. PS: 340 lipids is too big for a single GPCR, 140~160 would be enough before g_membed. You'd better read paper to see

[gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-29 Thread pavithrakb
Thank you both of you (Justin and Albert) sir. Initially I was using dppc128 and now I changed to POPE 340 and still my protein (its a GPCR protein) protrude out of the membrane (the same region; two amino acids). since you (Justin) you have mentioned that the protein must be completely inside the

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-08 Thread Albert
Just a piece of advices: you can consider equilibrate a lipids system which is large enough for your protein. This will save you huge amount of time on using tricks to add water later or enlarge the lipids. The system MUST BE IN PBC BOX for the g_membed input coordinate, otherwise your job w

Re: [gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-08 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/7/13 10:52 PM, pavithrakb wrote: Dear Sir, Thanks so much.. now what's the solution? Should I increase the box size? Yes. If the protein protrudes "out" of the central image, then you will have an unstable system due to atomic overlap as well as violations of the minimum image convent

[gmx-users] Re: problem in g_membed

2013-07-07 Thread pavithrakb
Dear Sir, Thanks so much.. now what's the solution? Should I increase the box size? Already I have centered the protein and fixed the POPE membrane size. Can you tell me how to increase the box size? or is there any other solution? -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble