sufficiently converged all of the thermodynamic observables. It will be very
kind of you if you can throw some light in this regard that how these
observables should be checked.
Thanks and Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
“Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.”
--- On Fri
t the answer is no.
So, I will go for loop reconstruction and will then see what happens.
Regards
Thanks and Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Tue, 12/10/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] query regarding missing residues
To: "Discussion list for GRO
coordinates through modeling,
So, if there is someway through which these residues remain missing and still I
can go ahead with simulation ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Thanks Kass for the help.
I want to specifically protonate one of the lysine near the active site and
deprotonate Tyr and Ser. It will be kind if you can please help me to know how
to select that specific residue number.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Mon, 27/9/10, Itamar Kass wrote
help me regarding the same, how to deprotonate Tyr
and Ser residue and protonate Lysine residue of the protein while
preparing the protein topology to be used for molecular dynamics simulation in
Gromacs.
Thanks and Regards.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Thanks Mark.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Fri, 13/8/10, Mark Abraham wrote:
From: Mark Abraham
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Restarting the job
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Friday, 13 August, 2010, 8:46 AM
- Original Message -----
From: sonali dhindwal
Date: Friday,
job too in the output
file, .gro ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
<>--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (u
ok, 4 files, my mistake, I checked all the files and they have RMSD among
themselves of 2-3 Angstrom, can you please explain it why it is so ?
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Fri, 16/7/10, Oliver Grant wrote:
From: Oliver Grant
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] to visualise protein conformation
Thanks Tsjerk,
I was confused, that why 3 files are generated as output. I will check it.
I appreciate what you said, I will read more.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Fri, 16/7/10, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] to visualise protein conformation
,c-alpha etc, I selected system, and the output is three
files, namely
1ns0.pdb
1ns1.pdb
1ns2.pdb
1ns3.pdb
Am I doing it correct ?
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Fri, 16/7/10, David van der Spoel wrote:
From: David van der Spoel
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] to visualise protein conformation
Hello All,
Sorry for a dumb question,,but I have a query that I want to run a 5 ns
simulation on one of the protein and I want to see protein's conformation after
every 1 ns,i.e to have a pdb file, so how should I proceed or changes should I
make in mdp file.
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
anks a lot.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] protein stability as a dimer
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Thursday, 1 July, 2010, 5:17 PM
sonali dhindwal wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have
.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
expert in this field.
Please help.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Tue, 8/6/10, Vitaly Chaban wrote:
From: Vitaly Chaban
Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Simulation with CsCl
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Date: Tuesday, 8 June, 2010, 9:03 PM
> Hi all:
> I am trying to simulate a polysaccharide in solut
Thanks and regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interfa
inated unsuccessfully, sorry!So if there is any server by
which I could do the same ? please help
Thanks and regards.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before p
energy minimized the protein by
restraining the positions as i mentioned before to not to have large changes in
the protein structure, and then again equilibration and simulation was carried
our by constraining all the bonds. So if that is ok to do ?
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Mon, 24
.
Thanks and regards.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www inte
problem of the
visualiser I m using, I am using pymol for it
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subs
Hello Gaurav,
when i did g_rms with structre before energy minimisation as refrence and
strucutre after energy minimisation, it came to be around 0.02.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Thu, 20/5/10, Gaurav Goel wrote:
From: Gaurav Goel
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] enegry minimisation
To: jalem
1 1000 1000 1000
23 1 1000 1000 1000
which is there in posre.itp file, and if these should have value of 1000 1000
1000 each ?
Thanks in advance.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Wed, 19/5/10, Gaurav Goel wrote:
From: Gaurav Goel
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] enegry minimisation
To
. I think those are
acceptable !!
Thermostat setup:
I will now do this thing seperately as protein and non protein only as given in
manual.
And also I will do that thing suggested by Gaurav, hopefully it will help in
not distorting the protein structure.
Thanks a lot.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On
= 0.12
fourier_nx = 0
fourier_ny = 0
fourier_nz = 0
pme_order = 4
ewald_rtol = 1e-5
optimize_fft = yes
;
; Energy minimizing stuff
;
emtol = 1000.0
emstep = 0.01
I hope it will help you to guide me further
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
compressibility = 4.5e-5
ref_p = 1.0
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp = 300.0
gen_seed = 173529
I hope it will help you to guide me futher.
Thanks
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Wed, 19/5/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it t
,
using emtol of 1000 kJ mol-1 nm-1 .
So is it necessary to do enegry minimisation step before MD, because this is my
modeled protein, and i have already done energy minimisation using different
program and after that I have done refinement also.
Thanks and regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx
Thanks a lot for your replies. I will start reading this and learning MD.
I really want to say that this forum is an excellent source of help.
Thanks for all your help.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject: Re: [gmx-users
in terms of manuals and literature, what should be referred to do a
start ?
I am sorry in advance if this query irritates someone, but any kind of help
will be highly appreciable.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
ms of the protein
first, and then on the Calphas is generally a goodidea."
How we can do this ??
and you also mentioned that time period could b increased from 100 to 500 ps,
does increase in time will be helpful in not distorting the strucutre ?
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Thu, 15/4/
.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users
s there in topology file. am i doing
something wrong in that ?
Thanks and Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Sat, 10/4/10, Mark Abraham wrote:
From: Mark Abraham
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] non-integral charge on my modeled protein structure
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Satu
1.06
there are so many non-integral charges here for residues,
please help.
Thanks and regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
this, it is written that the charge should be integer.
Please help
--
Sonali Dhindwal
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!
http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman
protein structre is very much
distorted, intialy it had tim barell topolgy with 8 beeta sheets and 8 alpha
sheets,,now only 7 sheets are remaing,one became coiled strucutre. What could b
the possible reason ?
Thanks in advance.
--
Sonali Dhindwal
The INTERNET now has a personality
Thanks a lot for your mail.
I hope it will help me.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Sat, 27/3/10, dur...@zib.de wrote:
From: dur...@zib.de
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] query regarding atom type
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Saturday, 27 March, 2010, 8:56 PM
hi t
Hello Sir,
Thanks for your help.
I have generated .itp file for my ligand through dundee server as I was unable
to generate it through Gromacs using any force field.
So what changes should I make ?
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Sat, 27/3/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject
Hello All
I am trying to add ions to my protein, for that I have run this command,,
[sak...@localhost ~/sonali]$ grompp -f ions.mdp -c protein_solv.gro -p
topol.top -o ions.tpr
and every time I run it, following error is coming
Fatal error:
Atomtype OA not found
I am using OPLSA force field
Hello All,,
I have a query, that I ran my simulation for 1 ns, and now I want to do it
further for 2 ns. Then is it possible to carry out my previous simulation to 2
ns from 1 ns, or I have to run it all again ?
Thanks and Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
The INTERNET now has a personality
output is showing). So what should I do ?
Please help
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!
http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx
Thanks for your help
I hope it will work.
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Wed, 24/3/10, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Query regarding toplogy of Manganese ion in protein
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Wednesday, 24 March,
Hello,
I have a Manganese ion in my protein, for which i want to run MD simulation.
Could
you please help me to know how to generate topology file for Manganese
and which force field to use, as none of the force field in Gromacs
supports Mn ion.
Please Help
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Wed
Hello,
I have protein in my protein, for which i want to run MD simulation.
Could you please help me to know how to generate topology file for Manganese
and which force field to use, as none of the force field in Gromacs supports Mn
ion.
Please Help
Regards
--
Sonali Dhindwal
The
--
Sonali Dhindwal
--- On Sun, 21/3/10, sonali dhindwal wrote:
From: sonali dhindwal
Subject: query regarding pdb2gmx program for protein with metal and a ligand
To: mail...@gromacs.org
Date: Sunday, 21 March, 2010, 1:43 PM
Hello Sir/Madam,
I am new to Gromacs, and o want to run molecular
<http://www.batchmates.com/images07/bmlogo_125.gif>
_
Hi gmx-users@gromacs.org
Your friend Sonali Priyadarshini invites you to join Batchmates.com
Join Batchmates and enjoy reuniting with your long lost pals and old
time buddies for FREE.
Click on the link below and become
hi everybody,
i have run simulation with gromacs for 10,00,000 iterations and have
obtained all the specified output .xvg files
while comparing and analysing the potential energy .xvg fil eand rms .xvg
file i found that thare is minimal fluctuation between the range og 1870 to
1925 ps now while t
hi everybody,
i am a new user of gromacs,while trying to run with the tool g_covar for
finding out an average running structure i am getting the following error.
Program g_covar, VERSION 3.3
Source code file: smalloc.c, line: 113
Fatal error:
calloc for mat (nelem=997170084, elsize=4, file gmx_c
Hi everybody,
i am a new user of gromacs, i had run simulation for 10,0 iterations
with the protein 1f9b and have obtained all the required output files.
after comparing and analysing the potential energy.xvg file and rms(root
mean square deviation).xvg file i have found out that there is most
hi everybody,
i am running Gromacs simulation with the protein 1f9b.pdb. I had earlier
got some errors with the ligands present i.e FE, BCT and 3ID so i had run
prodrg with BCT and 3ID but as prodrg server doesnot support for FE i had
obtaine4d itp and top files for FE by pdb2gmx. and ommiting the
with md it gives the error and consequently the
box crashes.everytime i try to run the mdrun step it gives the same error
and the box explodes. I want to know exactly what does the 1-4 interaction
mean and why this error is caused.
Any suggestions are highly appreciate
49 matches
Mail list logo