Hi Erik,
Yep, the problem was indeed with the ifdefs... I'm sorry, I thought I
had posted a solution. My bad.
Miguel
En/na Erik Marklund ha escrit:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I found this old thread and noticed that Miguel Ortis Lombardia had the
> same problems I had just half an hour ago. It seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Stefan,
To the first question: (run in Ubuntu)
> locate cpp | grep "/cpp$"
/lib/cpp
/usr/bin/cpp
/usr/share/doc/cpp
For the second, you must make sure that the atom names, for example,
from your Prodrg topology are compatible with those in the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Beniamino,
Perhaps you upgraded/updated your system kernel and for some reason
didn't choose the smp-enabled kernel. If the update/upgrade is done
automatically, check that its parameters are well chosen. Also, if you
don't use it, remove any kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Beniamino,
No, you should see a line:
processor : 1
together with its full description. Your output means your system sees a
single processor. Looks like a hardware problem, then.
HTH,
Miguel
En/na Beniamino Sciacca ha escrit:
> [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I like a lot "chimera" (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/) It doesn't
currently support gromacs trajectories, but it does support trajectories
exported to single or multiple pdb files. It's incredibly easy to learn
and use. You can depict your mole
t; Thanks for your reply.
> I used from Gromacs on WindowsXP with command prompt. How can I change
> DSSP path in this environment? Thank you very much.
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Jahan
>
> */Miguel Ortiz Lombardia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
>
> Hi Jahan,
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jahan,
First, you must make sure you have the dssp program; it doesn't come
with gromacs, but you can download it separately from:
http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
Secondly, if 'setenv' is not working you are not on a csh/tcsh shell. Try:
export
Hi Bob,
Just a comment: if you don't have a homogeneous DNA sequence (and
perhaps even in such a case) you will probably end distorting the
sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA if forcing every base pair to be
normal to a common z-axis.
Anyway, look for one of these two programs:
freehelix (by Di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>> You can try -norandom. I was under the impression that the potential
>> based placement was broken (had been for a while).
>
>
Hi David,
Thank you very much, the command line option -norandom did work and
placed the cations in the same place as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear colleagues,
It looks like genion behaviour has changed in gromacs 3.3.1 as compared
to 3.3
I still have both binaries in my machine and when using identical inputs
to add some Na cations the new one (3.3.1) adds them randomly, while the
previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
It works for me.
Miguel
En/na David van der Spoel ha escrit:
> David Mobley wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I can't connect to bugzilla.gromacs.org currently. Is it down?
>>
> works for me.
>
> can someone confirm that it works from off-site as wel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you Tsjerk.
Indeed, you're right. I'm using ffamber99, where the terminal residues
have names starting with N or C, for N- and C-terminal. After reading
your e-mail I re-run make_ndx and noticed that these terminal residues
are not considered Pr
g from one of my
> groups. I made a new index.ndx file and no errors were reported anymore.
> So my piece of advice is check your index file. I hope it helps,
> greetings,
> MGiò
>
>
> On 3/7/06, *Miguel Ortiz Lombardia* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I get this error from grompp:
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3
Source code file: readir.c, line: 1131
Fatal error:
Not enough ref_t and tau_t values!
However, I do have three values for ref_t and tau_t, as many as groups
(I made an index.ndx fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David van der Spoel escribió el 28/02/06 11:25 :
> Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
> Thank you Maik.
>
> The AMBER ports are some I'm testing, sure.
> BTW, I can't get it ready if I solvate the model. Everything goes fine
tute for Biophysical Chemistry
> Theoretical & computational biophysics department
> Am Fassberg 11
> 37077 Goettingen
> Germany
> Tel. : ++49 551 201 2310
> Fax : ++49 551 201 2302
> Email : mgoette[at]mpi-bpc.mpg.de
> mgoette2[at]gwdg.de
> WWW : http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
This is a question from someone just taking some timid steps in this
field. I'd like to know what force field, among those available in
Gromacs (v. 3.3) would you consider "better" for models containing
nucleic acids. As I understand this ma
17 matches
Mail list logo