Hi Sheeba,
with time I understood why it was happening. Check in the mdp file if you
still have the parameters to couple with the coarse grained file and
comment them. If they are present in the mdp file then mdrun looks for the
coarse grained file.
Hope this will be helpful
Francesca
2012/8
h for your help
Francesca
2012/6/16 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> On 6/16/12 7:54 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> yes and I do.
>> By the way the version of GROMACS I'm using is the 3.3.1, I forgot to
>> specify
>> that before.
>>
>>
> OK, I
yes and I do.
By the way the version of GROMACS I'm using is the 3.3.1, I forgot to
specify that before.
2012/6/16 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> On 6/16/12 7:41 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> Dear Justin,
>>
>> this is my trjcat command
>>
>> /home
have each structure at a different time
step. If I was using it wrongly please correct me.
Thanks in advance for all the help.
Francesca
2012/6/16 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> On 6/16/12 6:48 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> Dear Gromacs Users,
>>
>> While making a
Dear Gromacs Users,
While making a trajectory connecting different gro files I got the
following output which I don't understand.
Continue writing frames from
/home/cocktail2/vitalini/reverse_transformation_vacuum/300-166-160/300-166-160_annealing.gro
t=1 ps, frame=0
Last frame 0 time
if you create a bond you need to have angle, tortion etc...
Maybe when you processed pb2gmx it create a bond between the 799 and 801.
Francesca
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/One-molculetype-for-3-proteins-tp4997727p4997773.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users
can you write the atoms 6002 6004 6006 6017 6021 and all informations in your
topology file about these atoms??
Francesca
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/One-molculetype-for-3-proteins-tp4997727p4997758.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list
I checked and the resul is the same...but now I know I can use -chainsep
interactive!
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/One-molculetype-for-3-proteins-tp4997727p4997739.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
gmx-users mail
ctory. I used that method and I could apply the distance restraints.
Cheers,
Francesca
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/One-molculetype-for-3-proteins-tp4997727p4997736.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
gmx-users ma
s, and the area of interest is
plotted through xpm2eps only in the lower left corner. How can I manage to
obtain a plot that only focuses on the residues provided by the index file?
I have been searching the mailing list but couldn't find an answer to that.
Thank you in advance.
Best
--
Fra
ntal importance.
Unfortunately I couldn't find any more detailed documentation about it.
Could anyone explain to me what it does or point me to where to find
the related documentation?
Thank you very much
Francesca
2012/3/30 Mark Abraham :
> On 30/03/2012 8:39 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
, rcoulomb and rvdw to 1. Any ideas
on a faster way to add my position restraints or how to solve the
LINCS error? Thank you very much.
Francesca
2012/3/29 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> My minimization was done without any constraints. I'm start
actly the
reason I'm running the nvt equilibration? Or am I misunderstanding
something?
Thanks
Francesca
2012/3/29 :
> I didn't follow this whole thread, but I sometimes need to turn off all
> constraints when doing minimization. In fact, for that reason I entirely
> stop
destroied. Am I using some strange parameters for nvt
without realizing it? I've started from the mdp file provided by the
lysozyme tutorial non the Gromacs webpage.
if anyone has any ideas it is more than welcome.
Francesca
integrator = md; leap-frog integrator
n
in a cluster or in a strange position. I have added dihedral
restraints on them but still the same type of error. I'm using GROMACS
3.3.1. I have tried to switch to a newer version of GROMACS but still
the same error.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
Francesca
MINIMIZATION OUTPUT
Steepes
I think you can make an index file using make_ndx where you specify
the atoms you want to restraint.
Hope this can help.
Francesca
2012/3/12 James Starlight :
> Dear Gromacs users!
>
>
> I want to perform constrained MD simulation of my protein with inclusion of
> some experime
Either you develop your own version of the mapping or I guess you have
to use the old version...sorry, but I'm struggling with it right now
and I understand that it can be quite problematic.
Francesca
2012/3/9 rama david :
> Dear GROMACS specialists,
> How to convert C
va_random.gro
Could it be that the error arises from the fact that the dihedral
restraints were calculated from the pdb while the topology was built
through pdb2gmx with the flag -missing? I'm looking at CA C N CA
dihedrals, could any of those atoms be missing?
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users
obtain 2 values more than the input number of quadruplets and I
don't understand why. Is it here something I'm missing from how it
works?
Thanks for any help.
Francesca
2012/2/29 francesca vitalini :
> Thank you. It worked now.
> Best
> Francesca
>
>
>
> 2012/2/29 Mark Ab
Thank you. It worked now.
Best
Francesca
2012/2/29 Mark Abraham :
> On 1/03/2012 1:00 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>> Thanks for your answer. What I'm trying to do is calculate the value
>> in degrees of the angles listed in my index file
. Is there a faster way to get a file that has like two
columns, one for the dihedral and another one for the angles?
Thanks
Francesca
2012/2/29 Mark Abraham :
> On 29/02/2012 11:54 PM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> 2012/2/29 Mark Abraham:
>>>
>>> On 29/02/201
2012/2/29 Mark Abraham :
> On 29/02/2012 9:39 PM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to use g_angle to calculate a list of dihedrals that I have
>> into an hand made index file (angles.ndx), which looks like
>> [ dihedrals ]
>> 2 5
nt is instead to know the
value in degrees of each angle in the ndx file. Do you have any
suggestions apart from building an index file for each angle?
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
#x27;m doing it correctly or how can I check it by my self?
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don'
r
me as it calculates dihedrals in a different way from the tool
g_dihfix for which I need this values.
Any idea?
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mai
a lot
2012/1/31 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Well I'm keeping struggling with this script. Apparently the problem in in
>> using the integrator md with the GOMACS 3.3.1 version. In fact the same .mdp
>> file with integrator steep works. w
nks a lot
2012/2/20 Dommert Florian :
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:05 +0100, francesca vitalini wrote:
>> Just one last question Tsjerk, I was trying to load the cg.gro file
>> obtained with martinize in vmd and the program says it is unable to
>> load the molecule. the resu
90.00 P 1 1
ATOM 1 BB ALA 1 15.063 17.501 13.232 1.00 0.00
ATOM 2 BB GLU 2 14.568 13.732 14.199 1.00 0.00
ATOM 3 SC1 GLU 2 17.373 14.208 15.223 1.00 0.00
TER
ENDMDL
Does it sound right to you?
Thanks
2012/2/20 francesca vitalini
rough the pdb. Do you know a fastest way to make it
work? Thanks
However, my Martini account never worked, don't know why, so I cannot
post it directly.
2012/2/20 Tsjerk Wassenaar :
> Hey Francesca,
>
> Now there's a small bug in the program. Sorry about it. We'll put th
GLU 3 11.190 15.670 15.730 1.00 0.00
ATOM 24 O1 GLU 3 11.907 16.693 15.192 1.00 0.00
ATOM 25 O2 GLU 3 10.020 15.787 16.413 1.00 0.00
TER
can you please explain which the problem is to me?
thanks
2012/2/20 Tsjerk Wassenaar :
> Hi Frances
8]),10*F(a[28:36]),10*F(a[36:44]))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '2.'
2012/2/20 Tsjerk Wassenaar :
> Hi Francesca,
>
> The problem is that the second line of your gro file indicates there
> are 2410 atoms in the file, while there are only 25. Did you manually
2.91477 2.91477
Can you help me on that?
Thanks
2012/2/20 Tsjerk Wassenaar :
> Hi Francesca,
>
> Is this the latest version
> (http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/downloads/tools/204-martinize)?
> If it is, please send me the input file and I'll fix the bug. Note
&
for int() with base 10: '2.'
Can anyone help me on that?
Thanks
--
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
P
Thanks. I was mislead by the syntax in the online reference and forgot
to change everything into bash scripting.
You have been very very helpful!
2012/2/17 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> export DSSP /home/cocktail/vitalini/gromacs_special/bin/dssp
export DSSP /home/cocktail/vitalini/gromacs_special/bin/dssp
2012/2/17 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>> However now I jet another error
>> -bash: export: `/home/cocktail/vitalini/gromacs_special/bin/dssp': not
>> a
h the binary file to make it work? n the dssp
website they don't write anything about it.
Thanks again
2012/2/17 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>> In order to get the secondary structure of my pdb file I need to run
>> the do
message:
-bash: setenv: command not found
Any help?
Thanks
--
Francesca Vitalini
PhD student at Computational Molecular Biology Group,
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, FU-Berlin
Arnimallee 6 14195 Berlin
vital...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
francesca.vital...@fu-berlin.de
+49 3083875776
+49
that, any help?
Otherwise, I'm actually just looking for a toy system with which just
play around as I'm having issues with the reverse transformation. Any
suggestion for a pdb? thanks!
--
Francesca Vitalini
PhD student at Computational Molecular Biology Group,
Department of Mathem
012/2/17 Mark Abraham :
> On 17/02/2012 9:14 PM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> I tried, but apparently the atom that it is looking for exist already
>> in the rtp file!!
>>
>> this is the error
>>
>> Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.1
>> Source code f
[ dihedrals ]
-CA -C N H1 gd_14
[ impropers ]
-C -O N -CA gi_1
N H H -C gi_1
Any help?
2012/2/16 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Do you mean that I can just use the new version of pdb2gmx than change
>> the included forcefield
sing the GROMACS 3.3.1 version of pdb2gmx I get the aa.top
Trying to reconvert from cg to aa I obtain the message pasted before.
Any ideas?
--
Francesca Vitalini
PhD student at Computational Molecular Biology Group,
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, FU-Berlin
Arnimallee 6 14195 Berli
Do you mean that I can just use the new version of pdb2gmx than change
the included forcefield and in case the name of the atoms and it
should work?
2012/2/16 Justin A. Lemkul :
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Hi all!
>> I'm trying to create a topology fil
ry with 3 atoms
while sorting atoms
---
Any suggestions?
Thanks
--
Francesca Vitalini
PhD student at Computational Molecular Biology Group,
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, FU-Berlin
Arnimallee 6 14195 Berlin
vital...@zed
exactly when Open MPI kills them.
So... How ca I overcome the issue of overlapping atoms?
Thanks
Fra
2012/2/10 francesca vitalini
> In fact in the reverse transformation I'm feeding the CG structure
> information.
> Once I look through VMD to the FG structure I notice that the back
;t think I need
more than energy minimization for that.
What do you think?
2012/2/10 Mark Abraham
> On 11/02/2012 12:41 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
> In order to overcome the problem I tried to fix everything except the
> backbone (solvent, sidechain and CA, as I want the struct
ibrated it yet and I'm keeping it
fixed which could also be a source of overlapping.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Francesca
2012/2/10 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> I achieve
>>
>> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 205 steps,
5496e+07
Maximum force = 2.0486184e+12 on atom 4479
Norm of force = 7.2424045e+13
but again the same issue with table extent and still the production of pdb
files.
Any explanations?
Thanks
Francesca
2012/2/9 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>>
Tryed the double precision without any success... Again the same type of
error message. Might need to try other minimization algorithm. Any
suggestions on that?
2012/2/9 Justin A. Lemkul
>
>
> francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>> I'm trying to run some ene
000
152461 1000 1000 1000
152471 1000 1000 1000
152481 1000 1000 1000
152491 1000 1000 1000
152501 1000 1000 1000
152511 1000 1000 1000
..
187
aints ] specified
with type 6. However I cannot find the command to generate this .itp . On
the contrary, for positions restraints there is the genpr command that does
it, so I'm looking for the equivalent for the distance restrains. Can
anyone help? Btw, I'm using GROMACS 3.3.1,
Thanks
Francesc
gt; On 4/02/2012 12:56 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>>
>> Yes but those tips are not for bash scripts... :(
>
> You asked how to make the script always use the same no-longer-interactive
> selection. That's the information on the page we linked. The bash loop glue
>
ina
> On Friday 03,February,2012 09:56 PM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> Yes but those tips are not for bash scripts... :(
>>
>
> You'd better post what you have done so far about this script,
>
> probably someone can help you improve or refine it
Yes but those tips are not for bash scripts... :(
2012/2/3 Mark Abraham
> On 4/02/2012 12:21 AM, francesca vitalini wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> I have to use the gromacs command trjconv to obtain a .gro file from a
>> .xtc and a .pdb file. I have to do it for several files in a
tips?
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interfa
mtype CH2R not found
any suggestions here?
Thanks
Francesca
2012/1/31 Francesca Vitalini
> Thank you Justin for your quick reply. Unfortunately I cannot use a more
> modern version of GROMACS as my topology and .gro files where first created
> for a reverse transformation from cg
n)
Loaded with Money
WARNING: Incomplete frame: nr 0 time 0
Segmentation fault
I have checked with gmxcheck the .trr input file as it was suggested in another
discussion, and apparently it is ok, so I really don't know what to do.
Can you help me with that?
Thanks
Francesca
Il giorno 31/gen/2012,
Actually the directory is of my own and I have created it in my home directory
so that shouldn't be a problem as I also have created other files in the same
directory without any problems so far.
Other ideas?
Thanks
Francesca
Il giorno 31/gen/2012, alle ore 13.02, Justin A. Lemkul ha sc
. So I was
wondering if the ions are mapped in the fg_w.itp files and how or if there
is an appropriate .itp file for mapping the ions from cg to fg.
Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archiv
ns
Cleaning up temporary file gromppqBsIeH
---
Program g_fg2cg, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: ../kernel/toppush.c, line: 758
Fatal error:
Atoms in the .top are not numbered consecutively from 1
Hope you can help me with that.
Many Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users
ns
Cleaning up temporary file gromppqBsIeH
---
Program g_fg2cg, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: ../kernel/toppush.c, line: 758
Fatal error:
Atoms in the .top are not numbered consecutively from 1
Hope you can help me with that.
Many Thanks
Francesca
--
gmx-users
nd of atoms? I need to check the xy coordinates of these atoms from
the average structure or for each picosecond? If someone can explain
me this analysis I'll appreciate, in alternative, could you suggest
me a good article able to help me with this analyses? Thanx, Francesca
--
gmx-use
substitution of these atoms? Because I can try to add the parameters
in the five coloumns present but I should know if these values are
right.
thanks,
francesca
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the a
267= Co in COOH
opls_268= Oh in COOH
opls_269= Oc in COOH neutral
opls_270= H in COOH
in the file gbsa.itp in opls.ff directory these atoms missing. Now,
have I done something wrong? If is all ok, is it possible to create
these missin
63 matches
Mail list logo