[gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread shahab shariati
Dear jkrieger I used 2 times trjconv tool: 1) trjconv -f npt.xtc -s npt.tpr -n index.ndx -o 2npt.xtc -pbc nojump 2) trjconv -f 2npt.xtc -s npt.tpr -n index.ndx -o 3npt.xtc -pbc mol -center Dear Mark I selected all lipid atoms for centering. With my manner, pbc problem was solved just for lip

[gmx-users] cant find certain atomtypes from atomtype database

2013-10-23 Thread JuYeon
dear gromacs users im using gromacs to make CS2 MD programs i made pdb file (by converting mol file to pdb file) and rtp file for CS2this is what i made COMPNDUNNAMEDAUTHORGENERATED BY OPEN BABEL 2.3.2HETATM1 C LIG 1 19.882 -4.263 -0.027 1.00 0.00 C HETATM

Re: [gmx-users] Re: a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Kieu Thu Nguyen
Hi, I also want to try :) Best regards, ~Thu On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:39 PM, houyang chen wrote: > Hi Kevin > Can I have a try? > Best > Houyang > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Villarealed wrote: > > > Sound nice. I would like to try out. > > Could You please set up an account for me

Re: [gmx-users] converting pdb of protein+ATP+water+ion into gromacs files

2013-10-23 Thread Dina Mirijanian
got it. Thanks Justin. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 10/23/13 4:28 PM, Dina Mirijanian wrote: > >> Hello, >> I am trying to convert a protein+ATP+water+ion system pdb into gromacs >> files. I need to use the existing water and ion coordinates. I can >> conver

Re: [gmx-users] converting pdb of protein+ATP+water+ion into gromacs files

2013-10-23 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/23/13 4:28 PM, Dina Mirijanian wrote: Hello, I am trying to convert a protein+ATP+water+ion system pdb into gromacs files. I need to use the existing water and ion coordinates. I can convert the protein part using pdb2gmx and grompp fine. But, I do not know how to process the solvent a

[gmx-users] converting pdb of protein+ATP+water+ion into gromacs files

2013-10-23 Thread Dina Mirijanian
Hello, I am trying to convert a protein+ATP+water+ion system pdb into gromacs files. I need to use the existing water and ion coordinates. I can convert the protein part using pdb2gmx and grompp fine. But, I do not know how to process the solvent and ion coordinates separately and combine them t

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
Center on a particular lipid? Or head group? Mark On Oct 23, 2013 6:13 PM, "shahab shariati" wrote: > Dear gromacs users > > My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a > rectangular box. > > I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer > membrane,

Re: [gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread jkrieger
I usually use -pbc nojump for my protein simulations and this works every time. > Dear gromacs users > > My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a > rectangular box. > > I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer > membrane, b) drug inside water

Aw: RE: [gmx-users] Continuing runs from 4.5.4 in 4.6.3

2013-10-23 Thread lloyd riggs
I ran into this, you basically should determine your time frame, and install 4.5.4 if its a problem local (only 1-2 hours), to finish the work, otherwise you need to start from scratch.  But I did this with older versions, so do not know about higher versions (such as if the programmers eliminated

Re: [gmx-users] list

2013-10-23 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/23/13 12:44 PM, Michelangelo Scordino wrote: Sorry, i should want to be delete my contact from mailing list. thanks Unsubscribing is explained in the footer of every email that hits the list: "* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to

[gmx-users] list

2013-10-23 Thread Michelangelo Scordino
Sorry, i should want to be delete my contact from mailing list. thanks -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)

Re: [gmx-users] Re: a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread houyang chen
Hi Kevin Can I have a try? Best Houyang On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Villarealed wrote: > Sound nice. I would like to try out. > Could You please set up an account for me? > Regards, > Eduardo Villarreal > villarea...@hss.edu > > - > Eduardo Villarreal Ramírez > Postdoctoral Research F

[gmx-users] Re: a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Villarealed
Sound nice. I would like to try out. Could You please set up an account for me? Regards, Eduardo Villarreal villarea...@hss.edu - Eduardo Villarreal Ramírez Postdoctoral Research Fellow Mineralized Tissue Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery. -- View this

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Ashutosh singh
Hi Kevin I would like to try it out.. Let me know the procedure to create an account.. Regards Ash On Tuesday, October 22, 2013, Kevin Chen wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm writing to let you guys know that we have developed a web-based tool MD > simulation tool for GROMACS. It is a software pack

[gmx-users] pbc problem

2013-10-23 Thread shahab shariati
Dear gromacs users My system contains DOPC + CHOLESTEROLO + WATER + drug molecules in a rectangular box. I put drug molecule in 2 position: a) drug in the center of bilayer membrane, b) drug inside water molecules in top leaflet. For both positions, I did energy minimization successfully with fo

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Gabriele Lanaro
I'd like to check it out too On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Ehsan Sadeghi wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > It seems interesting. I would like to try it out. May I have an account? > > Best regards, > Ehsan > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Chen" > To: "Discussion list for GROMACS use

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread jkrieger
Please could I have an account too. > Hi Everyone, > > I'm writing to let you guys know that we have developed a web-based tool > MD > simulation tool for GROMACS. It is a software package primarily developed > for biological MD and offers a huge amount of possible options and > settings > for ta

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Ehsan Sadeghi
Hi Kevin, It seems interesting. I would like to try it out. May I have an account? Best regards, Ehsan - Original Message - From: "Kevin Chen" To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:34:10 AM Subject: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool Hi Eve

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Sounds very interesting. Can I have a test account, please? The Lindahl group has some related work going on at http://copernicus-computing.org/, automating large-scale simulation workflows. I'm not sure yet whether we have any synergies! :-) Cheers, Mark On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:34 PM,

RE: [gmx-users] Continuing runs from 4.5.4 in 4.6.3

2013-10-23 Thread Kevin Chen
There shouldn't be a problem for that. BTW, can you also enter a ticket at Daigrid.org for this matter? Thanks -Kevin -Original Message- From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of rajat desikan Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:24 AM To: Di

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Jeya vimalan
me to On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Thales Kronenberger < kronenberg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also would like to try > > > > > 2013/10/23 Gloria Saracino > > > Dear Kevin, > > I'm Gloria Saracino from the Center of Nanomedicine and Tissue > Engineering > > of the Hospital of Niguard

Re: [gmx-users] TFE-water simulation

2013-10-23 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/23/13 7:20 AM, Archana Sonawani-Jagtap wrote: Hi all, I have never performed TFE-water simulation therfore I want to know after inserting the peptide in the pre-equilibrated TFE-water mixture, do we need to adjust the number of TFE or water molecules ? That depends on how you construc

Re: [gmx-users] Energy minimizations taking really, really long?

2013-10-23 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/22/13 9:57 PM, Nimmy McNimmerson wrote: I have some simulations of inserting a probe molecule into a bilayer. Some molecules work fine. However, a certain class of molecules is taking an absurdly long time to run the exact same simulation, even though I energy minimized the molecules i

Re: [gmx-users] Continuing runs from 4.5.4 in 4.6.3

2013-10-23 Thread rajat desikan
Thank you, Mark! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > On Oct 23, 2013 7:24 AM, "rajat desikan" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We recently had a software upgrade in our cluster from gromacs 4.5.4. to > > gromacs 4.6.3.. I need to continue an earlier simulation that had been > run >

[gmx-users] TFE-water simulation

2013-10-23 Thread Archana Sonawani-Jagtap
Hi all, I have never performed TFE-water simulation therfore I want to know after inserting the peptide in the pre-equilibrated TFE-water mixture, do we need to adjust the number of TFE or water molecules ? or should I directly add ions to this system and run the production run. Any suggestion i

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Thales Kronenberger
I also would like to try 2013/10/23 Gloria Saracino > Dear Kevin, > I'm Gloria Saracino from the Center of Nanomedicine and Tissue Engineering > of the Hospital of Niguarda Ca' Granda in Milan, Italy. > > I'm interested into knowing more about this new web based toolas I use MD > everyday. >

Re: [gmx-users] Box size increases in NPT

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
By "crash" I meant "explode" not "DD is impossible." Explosions don't happen because of parallelism, they happen because the steps are too large for the size of the forces. The forces required to stably expand a box from 20A to 70A seem likely to be so large that I am very skeptical that you could

Re: [gmx-users] Box size increases in NPT

2013-10-23 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
If the job is not "very parallel", it will not crash. It is better to preequilibrate in NVT beforehand. Cyclopropylchloride is probably a liquid at 290K, if the model is parametrized reasonably. So it should not phase-separate. Vitaly On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: > On

Re: [gmx-users] Box size increases in NPT

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
On Oct 23, 2013 5:34 AM, "Nilesh Dhumal" wrote: > > Hello, > > I am running a NPT simulation for cyclopropylchloride(1) in > 50%water(100)+50%ethanol(100) using opls force field parameter . > > After equilibration box size increases from 20 A to 70 A. Really? Seems wildly unlikely to have occurre

Re: [gmx-users] Continuing runs from 4.5.4 in 4.6.3

2013-10-23 Thread Mark Abraham
On Oct 23, 2013 7:24 AM, "rajat desikan" wrote: > > Hi, > > We recently had a software upgrade in our cluster from gromacs 4.5.4. to > gromacs 4.6.3.. I need to continue an earlier simulation that had been run > in 4.5.4. using the .cpt, .tpr and .mdp. > > Are there any issues with continuing thes

Re: [gmx-users] a new GROMACS simulation tool

2013-10-23 Thread Gloria Saracino
Dear Kevin, I'm Gloria Saracino from the Center of Nanomedicine and Tissue Engineering of the Hospital of Niguarda Ca' Granda in Milan, Italy. I'm interested into knowing more about this new web based toolas I use MD everyday. Let me know what I have to do. Regards, Gloria Saracino __