Dear Users !
I have took a penta peptide and did topology generation ,
I have solvated it with water box ,
now i did a minimization with zero step , to know the energy of the initial
molecule ,
i used g_energy for the out put ,
like
$ g_energy -f em.edr
it gives as follows , i have to
Thanks Mark,
I will do the analysis in 4.5.4. Hope while doing the micelle clustering I
will not get into a infinite loop as in 4.0.7.
If I understand correctly, While using trjconv -pbc cluster, I should use
-e 0.002 or the frames (-dump option) in the xtc file (generated after the
micelles are
On 1/07/2011 3:35 PM, sulatha M. S wrote:
Hi Tsjerk,
I installed gromacs myself. I put the modified gmx_trjconv.c code in
the /src/tools subdirectory where the source code is located and tried
the command
make trjconv
But it gives me a series of error messages, as given below.
They're all m
Hi Tsjerk,
I installed gromacs myself. I put the modified gmx_trjconv.c code in the
/src/tools subdirectory where the source code is located and tried the
command
make trjconv
But it gives me a series of error messages, as given below. My gromacs
version is 4.0.7. I would like to continue in this
I downloaded v4.5 and v4.0 from the same websites as you mentioned in previous
email. I am not sure why v4.5 give inconsistent results. I haven't try v4.0,
because my simulation is using CHARMM FF. Could you give more details of
conversion tpr files from v4.5 to v4.0 using CHARMM FF?
Thank you v
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jianguo Li wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I also encountered the same problem you mentioned.
> In v4.5, when using -nstlp wiht large value (e.g., 1000), I got one
> file "localpressure.dat0". I tested first several frames of a trajectory,
> the calculated pressure is n
Hi Amit,
I also encountered the same problem you mentioned.
In v4.5, when using -nstlp wiht large value (e.g., 1000), I got one file
"localpressure.dat0". I tested first several frames of a trajectory, the
calculated pressure is not the average of the pressure of individual frames.
Btw,
Hello Everyone,
The git version of local pressure calculation at
http://repo.or.cz/w/gromacs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release-4-5-localpressure
is broken. I could not get it to work for my simulations.
I installed gromacs local pressure version 4.0 from
ftp://ftp.gromacs.org/pub/tmp/
I used
Hello,
I am trying to calcualte the velocity autocorrelation function for my
system. I have a system with glucose + ionic liquids (128 emi (cations)
and 128 Cl (anions)).
I am not geting proper velocity autocorrelation function.
g_velacc -f 6.trr -s 6.tpr -n glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx -nonormalize
balaji nagarajan wrote:
Dear Users !
i have tried in generating the -ter option in generating the topology
file !
it asks the below if i give the ter option ,
Select start terminus type for TYR-1
0: NH3+
1: ZWITTERION_NH3+
2: NH2
3: None
then if i give option 1 it chooses ZWITTERION
Dear Users !
i have tried in generating the -ter option in generating the topology file !
it asks the below if i give the ter option ,
Select start terminus type for TYR-1
0: NH3+
1: ZWITTERION_NH3+
2: NH2
3: None
then if i give option 1 it chooses ZWITTERION_NH3+ , i want to make the
On 1/07/2011 1:57 AM, SebastianWaltz wrote:
Hallo all together,
I am working on a system of a small peptide solvated in CHCl3.
I want to obtain the forces on the peptide atoms induced by the
solvent. For this I used the rerun option of mdrun_d. I did it now in
two ways:
1st: using trjconv to ge
Hello,
I am trying to calcualte the velocity autocorrelation function for my
system. I have a system with glucose + ionic liquids (128 emi (cations)
and 128 Cl (anions)).
I am not geting proper velocity autocorrelation function.
g_velacc -f 6.trr -s 6.tpr -n glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx -nonormalize
Amjad Farooq wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to calculate distance between two atoms from an MD run. For
example, how do I probe changes in distance between CD atom of Pro23 and
OE1 atom of Glu75 as a function of simulation time.
From the manual, I understand that one should use the c
Dear Andrew,
Compiling on Windows was tested only using MSVC and I have no idea if
it works or not under cygwin. You should just try, both cmake and gcc
is available for cygwin so you might be lucky and get mdrun-gpu
compiled without any additional effort.
All binaries on the Gromacs webpage _are
Hello everyone,
I would like to calculate distance between two atoms from an MD run. For
example, how do I probe changes in distance between CD atom of Pro23 and OE1
atom of Glu75 as a function of simulation time.
From the manual, I understand that one should use the command g_dist that
includ
Hi Simon,
pdb2gmx takesthe first structure. Taking an average would ba awkward, as it
is unlikely to correspond to a real structure.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Jun 30, 2011 6:02 PM, "simon sham" wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about pdb2gmx. If a pdb file contains a multiple
structures, will it average t
Hi,
I have a question about pdb2gmx. If a pdb file contains a multiple structures,
will it average the coordinates or just pick one of the structures to convert?
Thanks for your insight.
Simon
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Hallo all together,
I am working on a system of a small peptide solvated in CHCl3.
I want to obtain the forces on the peptide atoms induced by the
solvent. For this I used the rerun option of mdrun_d. I did it now in
two ways:
1st: using trjconv to get the pure peptide trajectory. When using the
Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote:
Dear All,
To remove water of crystallization from pdb files. I
removed following things from pdb file.
REMARK 3 SOLVENT ATOMS: 78
.
..
Dear All,
To remove water of crystallization from pdb files. I removed
following things from pdb file.
REMARK 3 SOLVENT ATOMS: 78
.
.
HETATM 1072
ahmet yıldırım wrote:
Dear Justin,
Thanks for your reply. Well, to explore the effect of the ligand on protein
g_mindist -f run.xtc -s run.tpr -od mindist.xvg -on numcont.xvg
Select a group: 1
Selected 1: 'Protein'
Select a group: 13
Selected 13: 'LİGAND'
Does this choice make sense?
Whet
Dear Justin,
Thanks for your reply. Well, to explore the effect of the ligand on protein
g_mindist -f run.xtc -s run.tpr -od mindist.xvg -on numcont.xvg
Select a group: 1
Selected 1: 'Protein'
Select a group: 13
Selected 13: 'LİGAND'
Does this choice make sense?
30 Haziran 2011 14:43 tarihinde
ahmet yıldırım wrote:
Dear users,
I want to see the effect of the ligand on each residue using the
following command:
g_rmsf -s run.tpr -f run.xtc -od rmsdev.xvg -o rmsf.xvg -res
Select group(s) for root mean square calculation
Select a group: ?
Which group should I choose?
The group tha
Dear users,
I want to see the effect of the ligand on each residue using the following
command:
g_rmsf -s run.tpr -f run.xtc -od rmsdev.xvg -o rmsf.xvg -res
Select group(s) for root mean square calculation
Select a group: ?
Which group should I choose?
Thanks in advance
--
Ahmet YILDIRIM
--
g
Hi Sulatha,
Did you install gromacs yourself or are you using a system wide
installation?
A. I installed myself
In that case you go into the directory where you have put the gromacs source
code and put the modified version of gmx_trjconv.c in the subdirectory
src/tools. Then you go into that dir
Dear Sulatha,
You can try the command trjconv -f a.xtc -o
b.gro -pbc cluster -e 0.002 with GROMACS 4.5.4.
Best regrds
Grigoris
--- Στις Πέμ., 30/06/11, ο/η sulatha M. S έγραψε:
Από: sulatha M. S
Θέμα: [gmx-users] micelle clustering
Προς: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Ημερομηνία: Πέ
27 matches
Mail list logo