Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
Since the -np flag is no longer necessary with grompp for the version 4.0,
how to tell Gromacs the number of the nodes being compiled together ?
It determines the maximum number available from your MPI environment and
uses that. So your MPI configuration and/or your mpi
Hi
Since the -np flag is no longer necessary with grompp for the version 4.0,
how to tell Gromacs the number of the nodes being compiled together ?
Thank you
Lin
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
>
>
> Hi
> I typed the command =>
>
> grompp_mpi -np 16 -v -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o
> 6L
Andrew Paluch wrote:
To whom this may concern,
I am performing simulations for a system that is modeled with a
Buckingham potential and PME for the electrostatic interactions. I have
developed my forcefield file such that non-bonded cross terms are listed
in a table, and also 1-4 interaction
Marc Charendoff wrote:
Sorry for bringing up the hydroxide ion question again, but are there any hints
as to how to place a single hydrogen on the oxygen atom? Can I somehow assign
control atoms outside the hydroxide anion as a means of reference for the
required ffG43a1.hdb modification? Loo
HI everyone,
I want to make a test using tables potential, I choose full-atoms benzene
molecules for example.firstly ,I transform the 12-6 LJ potential into table
potential, but when mdrun step, I got a error message as follows:
*
Sorry for bringing up the hydroxide ion question again, but are there any hints
as to how to place a single hydrogen on the oxygen atom? Can I somehow assign
control atoms outside the hydroxide anion as a means of reference for the
required ffG43a1.hdb modification? Looks like both methods to a
Paymon Pirzadeh wrote:
Hello,
I have a quick question about "-shuffle" switch in grompp. Do we still
need to apply this option in 4.0.5 when we use parallel versions or
not.
There is no such option in 4.0.5. What's more, domain decomposition speeds up
the calculations more than shuffling e
Hello,
I have a quick question about "-shuffle" switch in grompp. Do we still
need to apply this option in 4.0.5 when we use parallel versions or
not.
regards,
Payman
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/
Nav Rajput wrote:
Hi
I think you can try this
grompp_mpi -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o 6LYZ-MD6000.tpr
-np 16
This is wrong. As I said before (and has been stated many times across this
list), as of version 4.0, the -np option has been eliminated from grompp. There
is
Hi
I think you can try this
grompp_mpi -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o 6LYZ-MD6000.tpr -np
16
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
>
>
> Hi
> I typed the command =>
>
> grompp_mpi -np 16 -v -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o
> 6LYZ-MD6000.tpr
>
>
> It sho
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
I typed the command =>
grompp_mpi -np 16 -v -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o
6LYZ-MD6000.tpr
It showed =>
Invalid command line argument: -np
The above command works with 3.3.3 version but does not work with 4.0.5
version.
I was checking grompp_mpi
Hi
I typed the command =>
grompp_mpi -np 16 -v -f md.mdp -c 6LYZ-MD5500.gro -p 6LYZ.top -o
6LYZ-MD6000.tpr
It showed =>
Invalid command line argument: -np
The above command works with 3.3.3 version but does not work with 4.0.5
version.
I was checking grompp_mpi -h and cannot know the proper
Marc Charendoff wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to see if I can process and run a hydroxide
ion using the ffG43a1 force field. In doing this I have read through
chapter 5 of the manual and have a couple of questions. I do realize
that the chemistry and physics of this will need to be j
Hello,
I am attempting to see if I can process and run a hydroxide ion using the
ffG43a1 force field. In doing this I have read through chapter 5 of the manual
and have a couple of questions. I do realize that the chemistry and physics of
this will need to be justified, but at this point
the archive *can* still be searched from the "old" site:
http://oldwww.gromacs.org/swish-e/search/search2.php
Thanks Justin, this is very valuable information. I guess that this is
where a new search link on the new website should point for now.
Chris.
-- original message --
chris.ne...@u
Hello everybody:
I just received an email from Jussi Lehtola. I include :
extern "C" {
#include
}
in my source code, and it works.
Thanks all.
Kun
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Hi,
Actually the xdrfile_xtc.h file did include the xdrfile.h. And I also tried
to include xdrfile_xtc.h directly in my source file. The link error is still
there. I really don't know what's the problem because the make test command
passed.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Vitaly V. Chaban wrote
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:46 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> you need to use
>
> extern C {
> #include
> }
Whoops, that should read
extern "C" {
--
--
Jussi Lehtola, FM, Tohtorikoulutettava
Fysiikan laitos, Helsingin Yliopisto
jussi.leht...@hels
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:41 -0400, Kun Huang wrote:
> Hello everyone:
>
> Recently I am trying to use the xdr library downloaded from gromacs
> org to read xtc files. However when I link my program with the library
> there is an error. When I ran the make test, all the tests were
> passed. Thus I
chris.ne...@utoronto.ca wrote:
The inability to search the archives is certainly leading to some
redundancy. I use google now, it does a decent job of digging up stuff
from the gmx mailing list archives -- Even the oldwww search link takes
me to the new site inside of the iframe so that is no
Hi,
1. It seems you also need to include xdrfile.h.
2. Are the library files located in the same directory with your
source files when you link?
VItaly
>
> Recently I am trying to use the xdr library downloaded from gromacs org to
> read xtc files. However when I link my program with the library
The inability to search the archives is certainly leading to some
redundancy. I use google now, it does a decent job of digging up stuff
from the gmx mailing list archives -- Even the oldwww search link
takes me to the new site inside of the iframe so that is no use.
I suggest that the sear
To whom this may concern,
I am performing simulations for a system that is modeled with a
Buckingham potential and PME for the electrostatic interactions. I
have developed my forcefield file such that non-bonded cross terms
are listed in a table, and also 1-4 interactions are listed in a
I am trying to solvate a peptide which has an acetylated N-terminus in the
opls-aa force field. Running pdb2gmx (v. 4.0.2) gives me the following
error:
Error 1
No default Ryckaert-Bell types.
The guilty atoms in the topology are 4 atoms at the N-terminus. This issue
has been raised before as wel
Hello everyone:
Recently I am trying to use the xdr library downloaded from gromacs org to
read xtc files. However when I link my program with the library there is an
error. When I ran the make test, all the tests were passed. Thus I think
that the library should work just I don't know how to link
iu...@interponta.com.br wrote:
Hi,
I see there are many interesting topics going on, maybe due to this
I did not receive any answer/suggestion/comment to my question or maybe
it is rather naive. Anyway, it would like to listen to the experts if
there are no other suggestions to add to wha
Hi,
I see there are many interesting topics going on, maybe due to
this I did not receive any answer/suggestion/comment to my question or
maybe it is rather naive. Anyway, it would like to listen to the
experts if there are no other suggestions to add to what I did below.
Thanks,
P.R.Anand Narayanan wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I've been using gromacs to run a simulation of a protein with a
cofactor and a ligand. i had a problem while running the simulation; the
cofactor, ligand and the substrate molecule were spaced away from the
protein in the solvent box., thereby
Dear gromacs users,
I've been using gromacs to run a simulation of a protein with a cofactor and a
ligand. i had a problem while running the simulation; the cofactor, ligand and
the substrate molecule were spaced away from the protein in the solvent box.,
thereby creating literally zero interac
I had the similar problem but I untar it in two step to get around it:
1st gunzip *.tgz
2nd tar it in usual without z option
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:25:15 +0200
> From: sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] topolbuild1_2_1.tgz decompressing
30 matches
Mail list logo