It seems to be a problem related to the debian package. I have compiled
gromacs 3.3.3 from source with gcc-4.3 and apparently the problem has
dissapeared. Perhaps, the binaries on the debian package were compiled
with gcc-4.1.
Cesar Avila escribió:
> Dear all,
> I am new to the gromacs simulation
Dear all,
I am new to the gromacs simulation package. Thus far I have been using
Charmm and NAMD, but now I am interested on testing Marrink's
Coarse-Grained Martini FF. I managed to setup an initial configuration for
a protein in a water box. After a few minimization steps, I ran the
simulation fo
I was wondering why the Hydrogens from the non N-terminus NH2 group in the
uncharged Lysine molecule had charges of 0.36 as specified by gromacs(H1 and
H2) when the Jorgensen published value for H's in RCH2NH2 was 0.35. All of the
other charges in this molecule I have found in publications exce
Tsjerk,
Well, the best way would be AIMD, no doubt.
William,
Look here
http://www.mpibpc.mpg.de/groups/grubmueller/start/teaching/vorlesung_computerbiophysik_2004/p4/index.html
for an example how freezing/melting of argon is processed by means of
GROMACS.
TW> Hi William,
TW> I'm not very sure y
Hi Sudheer,
I would say you just try to add a nanosecond to a run which still has
ten to go (10+1=11). That also tells me you're not trying to extend a
run already performed (properly), as it has a starting step of 0
(starting time 0.000). Then on another note, it seems that you didn't
copy-paste
Hi Minnale,
You could try another version as was suggested... Never hurts to try.
The magic number error occurs if the file is screwed. trjconv will
correctly process the trajectory up to the point where the magic
number error occurs, so you can restart from the last good entry in
the file. Out of
Hi,
Well, I think it should also be incorporated into (Gromacs) MD
tutorial material. It's on my to do list. I don't think there's much
use in adding a message in the mdrun output (might as well always add
it, not even checking for jumps). It's basic PBC, which, with a bit of
thinking, can be unde
Hi William,
I'm not very sure you can simulate crystallization of salt with
classical MD. In any case, the force field is not parameterized to
reproduce crystallization or melting c.q. the melted state of NaCl.
It's therefore unlikely that it will produce meaningful results. The
best approach :) w
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:24 -0400, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> > Why do you want to use GCC 3.4 instead of the default compiler of the
> > distribution which is GCC 4.1.2 invoked with gcc?
> >
> From the Downloads section of the home page:
>
> "WARNING: do not use the gcc 4.1.x set of compilers.
9 matches
Mail list logo