Hi,
As promised, there will be a second gromacs workshop this year.
The workshop will be held at the Max Planck Institute for biophysical
chemistry in Goettingen, Germany from 24 to 26 september.
As in the previous workshop in Stanford, the idea is to bring together
people experienced with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't post to the users list and the developers list
simultaneously with the same question. I think this is more
appropriately a users list question. I guess if you also get a reply on
the developers list then it pays to post to both, but the idea is to put
it o
Please don't post to the users list and the developers list
simultaneously with the same question. I think this is more
appropriately a users list question. I guess if you also get a reply
on the developers list then it pays to post to both, but the idea is
to put it only in one space.
H
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
for 45a3 force field, is it created in vacuum / in water or solution ?
Justin said the most of the force field is defined as condensed phase ???
Do you mean the liquid phase / or in water phase ?
Check the GROMACS manual for literature references for this and other
for
Hi
for 45a3 force field, is it created in vacuum / in water or solution ?
Justin said the most of the force field is defined as condensed phase ???
Do you mean the liquid phase / or in water phase ?
Thanks
Lin
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:13:37 -0400
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <[EMAIL
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
Does the Gromacs only recognize the residues in the
pdb file?
No... but pdb2gmx will only build a topology in an automated fashion if
the residues are present in its databases.
If they are not the standard amino acids in the library, Gromacs can't
read, right???
A
Hi
Does the Gromacs only recognize the residues in the
pdb file?
If they are not the standard amino acids in the library, Gromacs can't
read, right???
Or, how does the Gromacs simulate the organic molecule?
The command pdb2gmx could not produce the top and the gro file.
Instead, it shows that "
Hi Justin,
This command is just what I wanted. Thanks a lot.
Hi Yang,Andrea and Alan,
Thanks for your help. The link for PDB format is very useful.And I
think Xemacs will be helpful for future use.
Best regards,
xiupeng
From: [EMAIL PR
Paul Whitford wrote:
This is likely an embarrassingly trivial problem, but let's see.
I am following the energy minimization scheme presented in the groningen
tutorial
http://md.chem.rug.nl/education/mdcourse/MDpract.html
I believe I follow the directions exactly, yet I can not minimize belo
Ragothaman Yennamalli wrote:
Dear Mark,
Thanks for the mail.
Since there's three different usages of -np you'd
need to be more
precise to make a good description of your problem.
I was changing the -np option in mdrun and grompp.
The symptoms you observe make sense if $NSLOTS==1. Since
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
For one molecule, will Gromacs give the same set of force field
parameters to this molecule no matter this molecule is put in water or
in vacuum?
The bond length, the bond angle, and the dihedral angles of the same
molecule will be different in water and in vacuum.
So, wil
This is likely an embarrassingly trivial problem, but let's see.
I am following the energy minimization scheme presented in the groningen
tutorial
http://md.chem.rug.nl/education/mdcourse/MDpract.html
I believe I follow the directions exactly, yet I can not minimize below
Fmax~500
I download 1A
Quoting Chih-Ying Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
> For one molecule, will Gromacs give the same set of force field
> parameters to this molecule no matter this molecule is put in water or
> in vacuum?
Depending on what's defined within the specific force field, yes. For example,
ffG43b1 is a "vac
Hi
For one molecule, will Gromacs give the same set of force field
parameters to this molecule no matter this molecule is put in water or
in vacuum?
The bond length, the bond angle, and the dihedral angles of the same
molecule will be different in water and in vacuum.
So, will the force field param
Hello Una (and everyone else)
I'm happy to announce that, while not yet available in cvs, it will
very soon be possible to do implicit solvation with Gromacs.
I'm have a working implementation almost finished, and are currently
running some tests to assure that the code is stable.
With any
To the Gromacs user community,
As of April 2007 it was not possible to do implicit solvent MDs with Gromacs
(http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2007-April/026849.html). Has
this changed since then?
Kind regards, Una
--
Una Bjarnadottir School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Sc
Dear Mark,
Thanks for the mail.
>
> Since there's three different usages of -np you'd
> need to be more
> precise to make a good description of your problem.
>
I was changing the -np option in mdrun and grompp.
> The symptoms you observe make sense if $NSLOTS==1. Since
> all three -np
> fla
Ragothaman Yennamalli wrote:
Dear all,
I get an error while running grompp or mdrun in a Sun cluster. Each node has 4
processors. I am submitting the job via a SGE script.
After, I submit the job by "$qsub test_gromacs", the run terminates with the
following message in the log file. Please tell
Nadir Kaplan wrote:
What is going on here? How can I get velocity info? Any help will be
greatly appreciated. Note that, there is an external acceleration on
the water molecules, where is the position of CNT is fixed. So
obviously water molecules should have finite velocities.
Turn off the weir
Dear all,
I get an error while running grompp or mdrun in a Sun cluster. Each node has 4
processors. I am submitting the job via a SGE script.
After, I submit the job by "$qsub test_gromacs", the run terminates with the
following message in the log file. Please tell me how to troubleshoot this
p
Dear Mark,
I am doing a simulation of a carbon nanotube (CNT) inside water.
First I am going to describe my problem and then give info about my
simulation setup (initial conditions, parameters, etc.).
My problem is as follows:
(1) I am doing a *.gro file of a *.pdb of a (16,16) CNT, without
Dear Justin,
The reply is below:
I am doing a simulation of a carbon nanotube (CNT) inside water. First I am
going to describe my problem and then give info about my simulation setup
(initial conditions, parameters, etc.).
My problem is as follows:
(1) I am doing a *.gro file of a *.pdb of a
h a wrote:
Dear users,
I'm using Gromacs to generate polymer surface. Is it possible using
genbox command ? As I see genbox is used to create a box filled with
Correct. editconf can do basic replication of a periodic image, however.
Mark
___
gmx-
Dear users,
I'm using Gromacs to generate polymer surface. Is it possible using genbox
command ? As I see genbox is used to create a box filled with solvent.
thank you,
Sincerely
Harshith
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.
wang kelvin wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I am simulating DMSO. At fisrst ,bond parameters contain two c-c
bonds,and c-o bond ,which actually not in existence. But gmx 's force
field ffg53a6 documents in top directory defines these bonds. When
running mdrun , system reminds "segmentation default". the
xi zhao wrote:
> I performed remd using GROMACS 3.3.1 at four different temperatures:
> 270k, 400k, 540k, 660k, and produced four trajectories. I want to know
> whether my simulation is ok, but I do not know how to analysis my
> trajectories.
Probably these temperatures are spaced far too wide
26 matches
Mail list logo