Hi,
You may try "tpbconv". Read help for "tpbconv" first.
Siavoush
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anamika Awasthi
Sent: Thu 2008/03/20 08:14 ق.ظ
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] wants to simulate for more timesteps
Dear Gromacs Users,
I h
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have simulated my protein for 15 ns, I need to simulate it for more.
How can I do this? Is this any easy way that it can restart after
previous 15 ns?
Thanks in advance
--
Anamika Awasthi, PhD
DBT-Postdoctoral Fellow
Laboratory of Structural Biology
Centre for DNA
Dear all,
I would like to make MD simulations of a drug at the binding site of the
receptor sorrounded by DPPC.
pdb coordinate file of all DPPC units (189 units, 1 unit has 130 atoms) are
described seperately. I was using Dundee PRODRG server for generating .itp and
drgpoh2.pdb files for
Dear all,
I am simulating a system with Gromacs/CPMD and have the output files
WC_SPREAD and WANNIER_CENTER from CPMD. Now I need
construct the electron density from them. Would some one please
tell me how to do that? Thanks a lot in advance.
The following is the content of file WC_SPREAD:
Quoting Gadzikano Munyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to do dynamics on a cyclic polypeptide. The peptide contains a residue
> that is not standard Ornithine. I have added [ORN] to the ffoplsaa.rtp file
> and the aminoacids.dat file.I have put these in the working directory and
> also in the lib
No, but you should try to distinguish an O (letter-O) from a 0 (numeric zero).
Tsjerk
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Gadzikano Munyuki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to do dynamics on a cyclic polypeptide. The peptide contains a residue
> that is not standard Ornithine. I have added [ORN]
I want to do dynamics on a cyclic polypeptide. The peptide contains a residue
that is not standard Ornithine. I have added [ORN] to the ffoplsaa.rtp file and
the aminoacids.dat file.I have put these in the working directory and also in
the library. If I grep these files [ORN] is there but i stil
I suppose it should be mentioned that even with an average desktop computer
it should be more than feasible to minimise the whole of your enzyme
system. If you want to simulate the system for long periods of time then
that is a different question.
Tom
--On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 08:34:29 +
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion and I am sorry that didn't let the list know that the
problem had been fixed. (I haven't used the mdrun yet, but the other stuff
seems working) Thanks to the Makefile that I have received from David. I
compared that file with the one created in the script director
Deear mister Ben,
I don't know if your mail is serious, however I find your system very
interesting. Personally we think you mail might be joke, however I will do
besst I can do helping you. My professor had once similar good idea. We are
currently implementing relativist
Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I have recently modified the routine as to not crash upon a shift over
periodic boundaries, which would occur with the original code. Also, I
streamlined the routines such that they don't lead to large
modifications of update.c
I will put the modifie
Andreas Kring wrote:
Hi all.
I have tried to search the mailing archives and the FAQ, but I could not
find an answer, so here goes...
This is not surprising, since your problem is with configuring LAM, not
GROMACS. Actually, the reason for your problem not dependent on the
software you're t
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Quoting s lal badshah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear experts,
Hi! I minimized the system and gies 10,000 nsteps, but the output is:
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
Potential Energy = -1.9742134e+21
M
Hi all.
I have tried to search the mailing archives and the FAQ, but I could not
find an answer, so here goes...
I'm using Ubuntu 7.10 and the latest gcc compiler in this distro is
gcc-4.1.2. Being aware of the warning that the gcc-4.1.x compilers are
broken, I installed gcc-4.3.0 using the
Quoting s lal badshah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear experts,
> Hi! I minimized the system and gies 10,000 nsteps, but the output is:
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
> Potential Energy = -1.9742134e+21
> Maximum force
Dear experts,
Hi! I minimized the system and gies 10,000 nsteps, but the output is:
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
Potential Energy = -1.9742134e+21
Maximum force = 4.1648520e+06 on atom 1934
Norm of force = 5.6
Hi,
I'm not quite sure what David was thinking, but Makefiles are created
on-the-fly with automake/autoconf and tailored to the commands on your
system, so there is absolutely no way a Mac makefile will work on an
SGI :-)
An error like
make: file 'Makefile' line 417: syntax error
*** Err
Hi,
Not in version 3.3.
In version 4.0 only x & y will be selected automatically when there are walls
along z-planes.
Berk.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:14:20 -0600
> Subject: [gmx-users] Remove COM of group only in x & y direction
>
> He
> thanks for the help...
> sorry I made a mistake with flags -f -e in the mail
Right, well there's a lesson for you. Computers are literal, and so tend
to be the people who use them well. Copy-and-paste helps you to be
literal. Filtering things through your head tends to increase errors.
Mark
>
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I have recently modified the routine as to not crash upon a shift over
periodic boundaries, which would occur with the original code. Also, I
streamlined the routines such that they don't lead to large
modifications of update.c
I will put the modified code on line, probably t
thanks for the help...
sorry I made a mistake with flags -f -e in the mail
Swapna
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> SWAPNA wrote:
> > Dear gmx users,
> > I am using g_anaeig to filter my traj along the first eigenvector.
> >
> > 'g_anaeig -b 5000 -f 15000
Hi Lacerda,
You should be cautious in the interpretation of your results. Your
active site will only be minimized in potential energy in the context
of your frozen surface and your restraint internal degrees of freedom.
You should be very confident that your surface is about correct and
your inter
22 matches
Mail list logo