Mark Abraham wrote:
Jerome Henin wrote:
Hi all,
As quite a few people have done before, I am about to try and convert
a CHARMM topology into a GROMACS one. To that effect, I will probably
need one or several programs that will do part of the job. When these
are done, I suppose they might be
Navratna Vajpai wrote:
Dear All
I have been able to carry on with the MD run of my peptides. But when I
converted the traj into the pdb file I realized that there are no HA
atoms in the pdb. I checked the rtp file and found that even those atoms
are not defined there. So can anyone tell me how
Jerome Henin wrote:
Hi all,
As quite a few people have done before, I am about to try and convert a CHARMM
topology into a GROMACS one. To that effect, I will probably need one or
several programs that will do part of the job. When these are done, I suppose
they might be of interest to others
Hi friends!I have built a fluorescent probe using PRODRG and saved the coordinates without the hydrogens. 1. Must I save with hydrogens and charges?2. How to incorporate this onto cysteines. As the coordinates need to be adjusted to the location of Cys when put on the protein before I can perform a
Hi all,
As quite a few people have done before, I am about to try and convert a CHARMM
topology into a GROMACS one. To that effect, I will probably need one or
several programs that will do part of the job. When these are done, I suppose
they might be of interest to others on this list.
Since
Diane,
Also, some of my inhibitors and complexes are charged. In my simulation of the
complex, I have added a counterion (Na). Does this complicate matters worse ?
For the inhibitors in water, I protonated the ligand, according to a procedure
I saw in a paper.
Ordinarily you want the system
Hi Diane
Thanks for writing in. I guess I should have mentioned
this earlier. To obtain partial charges for my
substrate topology, I do an abinitio calculation
(B-3LYP/6-31G*) and get the Chelpg and MKS charge
distributions using Gaussian. Then I try and fit these
charges to the steroid based on (
Hi Elias,
Use a GROMOS96 force field (43a2, 45a3, or preferrably 53a5 or 53a6)
or OPLS, or Amber... Let it depend on the question you want to answer.
Do you want to compare with results previously obtained? Do you need
all atoms, i.e. all hydrogens, or can you do with a united atom force
field (a
Message: 2Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:05:07 -0300From: "Elias santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [gmx-users] clusters [4Fe-4S]+2To: gmx-users@gromacs.orgMessage-ID: <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"Hi !!I to construct to the block for residuo FS4 of the two cl
Hi
As I fill the fields of the archive specbond.dat for linkings between atoms of Fe of residue FS4 and SG of residuo of cystein
Elias
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post
On the same subject, I have read in the list about long-range interactions
(Coul-LR, LJ-LR) which are supposed to be included in the energy parameters
calculated in g_energy, but I never see those. Do you have to write something
specific in the .mdp files to get them ?
Also, some of my inhibit
I am also working with steroids (but in my case, steroidal hybrid inhibitors)
with the gmx force field. From my experience working with the PRODRG program,
the topologies needed some modifications (for example the program assigns my
phenol OH as a carbonyl and one aromatic bare carbon as a CH1)
dear gromacs users,
i am new to gromacs (using version 3.3.1) and trying to simulate an enzyme
which is covalently bound to a piece of dna i.e. a tyrosine is connected to
the dna backbone establishing a phosphodiester group.
but each time i try to start the simulation using the G43a1 forcefield t
Dear All I have been able to carry on with the MD run of my peptides. But when I converted the traj into the pdb file I realized that there are no HA atoms in the pdb. I checked the rtp file and found that even those atoms are not defined there. So can anyone tell me how to get the HA (after or bef
Diane,
I think we have used it with Amber 8 and Amber 9, probably also Amber
7, although in its current version it relies on being able to parse
prmtop files, which means that it is dependent on the amber8/9 prmtop
format. If this changed, it wouldn't work.
I'll send it along in just a moment.
Title: Ligand binding energy using LIE with PME
Hi gmx-users
I know that this has been discussed before from consultation of the mail archive, but there is still confusion :
I want to obtain the ligand binding energy from my 1ns PME simulation of a ligand-protein complex. I have made, as di
Martin Höfling wrote:
Hello everybody,
did I overlooked some piece of documentation in which these binary formats are
described? Or do you have to read the gromacs sources to find information?
Regards
Martin
There is some link on the website to the xtc format, but for details you
ne
Hello everybody,
did I overlooked some piece of documentation in which these binary formats are
described? Or do you have to read the gromacs sources to find information?
Regards
Martin
--
"Filme"? Ist das dieses neumodisches Zeugs, das wie Internet ohne
klicken funktioniert? (Sven Tue
Many thanks Eric, it worked. I didn't really had look into this.Best regardsNavOn Aug 16, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Erik Marklund wrote:On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:07 +0200, David van der Spoel wrote: Navratna Vajpai wrote: Hey Mark..I had attached the file along with the mail. I think you could not receive
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:07 +0200, David van der Spoel wrote:
> Navratna Vajpai wrote:
> > Hey Mark..
> > I had attached the file along with the mail. I think you could
> > not receive it. let me paste the contents and explain it little more.
> > I am trying to run the simulation in vacuum of a n
Navratna Vajpai wrote:
Hey Mark..
I had attached the file along with the mail. I think you could
not receive it. let me paste the contents and explain it little more.
I am trying to run the simulation in vacuum of a nona peptide. I managed
to get pdb2gmx working and even further the EM working
Hey Mark..I had attached the file along with the mail. I think you could not receive it. let me paste the contents and explain it little more. I am trying to run the simulation in vacuum of a nona peptide. I managed to get pdb2gmx working and even further the EM working. But when I tried to do the
Navratna Vajpai wrote:
Dear All ..
I have only recently started the GROMACS package. I want to run a MD
simulation in vacuum for 5 ns say. I have tried to edit the demo file
which comes with the GROMACS package. but Some how it give an error.
Which I am still unable to solve. I am atttaching t
Dear All... I was trying to move further and finally managed to move forward. I am explaining the problem in little more detail. The problem arises when the grompp before the mdrun is executed. I don't know why but it ask for -n option for its execution. I tried that also but still the error stays.
Dear All .. I have only recently started the GROMACS package. I want to run a MD simulation in vacuum for 5 ns say. I have tried to edit the demo file which comes with the GROMACS package. but Some how it give an error. Which I am still unable to solve. I am atttaching the file under this. Could an
Viswanadham Sridhara wrote:
Hello Dr.Spoel and others,
There is one more problem with the simulation of hen egg white lysozyme
simulation in water I am running. The timestep I could use is just 0.5
fs or 0.0005ps. Is there any way around to increase the timestep.
This is how a part of my mdp f
Luciano Costa wrote:
Hi all and Spoel
Based on mailing list answer at Mar 20th 2003, which discribed the
entire topology file for water shell model, referencing on J. Phys. Chem
B. 105 (2618) 2001, I have tryed to run water polarization MD with this
file.itp. However, running grompp a message
27 matches
Mail list logo