> Dear users, How can I do a constant volume simulation in Gromacs? By
> removing Pressure coupling, it is constant pressure.
No. Constant pressure is a bit of a misnomer - the algorithms used to
achieve "constant pressure" simulations use feedback mechanisms to keep
the pressure close to constant
> Final structure.
>
> On 6/30/06, Samuel C Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Quick question: Is the output structure of mdrun designated by -c a
>> final
>> structure, or an average structure? I want the final structure -- am I
>> better off extracting it from the .trr?
It's a
+++ karamyog singh [Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:27:47PM +0200]:
> Dear users, How can I do a constant volume simulation in Gromacs? By
> removing Pressure coupling, it is constant pressure. By removing both
> Pressure and Temp coupling, it will be constant energy simulation.
> What is the method of imp
Dear GMX users,
In ffoplsaanb.itp, there are 8 columns.
; name bond_typemasscharge ptype sigma epsilon
opls_001 C 6 12.01100 0.500 A3.75000e-01
4.39320e-01 ; SIG
In ffG53a5nb.itp, there are 7 columns.
[ atomtypes ]
;name at.num mass charge
Dear all
how can i compute solvent accessible surface area for
a special residue in all of time?
thanks
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Final structure.
On 6/30/06, Samuel C Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys,
Quick question: Is the output structure of mdrun designated by -c a final
structure, or an average structure? I want the final structure -- am I
better off extracting it from the .trr?
Sam
-Original Message
Hi Guys,
Quick question: Is the output structure of mdrun designated by -c a final
structure, or an average structure? I want the final structure -- am I
better off extracting it from the .trr?
Sam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL
It seems that you can modify the following line in the function *mk_nbfp() in force.c and achieve what you want.
C6(nbfp,atnr,i,j) = idef->iparams[k].lj.c6; (it is in line 117 of force.c in version 3.3)
and change it to
C6(nbfp,atnr,i,j) = 0;
This will set the attractive interaction
Hello GMX users,
(this may be more of a tcsh question, but here goes anyway). I'm trying
to write a script to go through some trajectories and calculate
hbonding. It looks like this:
#!/bin/tcsh
foreach number (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11)
g_hbond -f ../../FullMD/FullMD$number.trr -s
../..
Hello GMX users,
(this may be more of a tcsh question, but here goes anyway).
I'm trying to write a script to go through some trajectories and
calculate hbonding. It looks like this:
#!/bin/tcsh
foreach number (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11)
g_hbond -f ../../FullMD/FullMD$number.trr -s
..
From: "Joanne Hanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To:
Subject: [gmx-users] Temperature averages and log files
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:24:13 +0100
Hi
I don't know if what I am going to ask has a very simple answer that I am
missing but I am very confuse
Dear users, How can I do a constant volume simulation in Gromacs? By
removing Pressure coupling, it is constant pressure. By removing both
Pressure and Temp coupling, it will be constant energy simulation.
What is the method of implementing a constant volume simulation.
Thanks.
Karamyog Singh.
Un
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 17:52 +0530, sangeeta wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to run the dynamics of protein-ligand complex following the
> tutorial "GROMACS Tutorial for Drug_Enzyme Complex version 3.3.1"
> . I am running position restricted dynamics of the 91az8.pdb protein as
> mentioned
Dear all,
I am trying to run the dynamics of protein-ligand complex following the
tutorial "GROMACS Tutorial for Drug_Enzyme Complex version 3.3.1"
. I am running position restricted dynamics of the 91az8.pdb protein as
mentioned in the tutorial trp.pdb & drg.pdb)in a Linux server machine, I c
Title: RE: [gmx-users] Van der Waals: switch attractive term off
I want to switch off LJ attractive to have my chains slip to each other and therefore increase the intanglements content.
Suggestion?
Alessandro Mattozzi
M.Phil., Ph.D. student
Dept. of Fibre and Polymer Technology
Royal Instit
From: "Alessandro Mattozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To:
Subject: [gmx-users] Van der Waals: switch attractive term off
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:14:28 +0200
Hi All
I simulate PE using AUA. I would like to switch the attractive term of the
vdW force.
dear gmx-users//
I need a very simple force field to calculate very fast the internal
energy of a given conformation of a small molecule.
Since neither bond-lengths nor bond-angles will be varies, I think i
only need terms for vdW, torsions and maybe electrostatics.
It is also important to have
Alessandro Mattozzi wrote:
Hi All
I simulate PE using AUA. I would like to switch the attractive term of
the vdW force. How can I do it?
By reading the relevant parts of the manual and working out how LJ terms
are implemented and adjusting your topology and/or forcefield files
accordingly.
Title: Van der Waals: switch attractive term off
Hi All
I simulate PE using AUA. I would like to switch the attractive term of the vdW force. How can I do it?
Regards
Alessandro Mattozzi
M.Phil., Ph.D. student
Dept. of Fibre and Polymer Technology
Royal Institute of Technology
Stockholm, Swe
19 matches
Mail list logo