On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Alvin Orzechowski <
alvin.orzechow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought "You will notice that when *these posts*..." made it clear I
> meant the Group Interface, Marko. Alas, there's a corollary to Murohy's
> Law that goes, "
> If you can explain something so clearly
I *think* I have it figured out. Turns out that much of the list traffic
(but not all, which is what made it confusing) was being labelled
Important, and I had an option set to override filters for important
messages. I must have set that a long time ago. I've turned it off and
we'll see what happe
When I select the compose addressee options in the my contact/all contacts
books 'compose' option it comes back these are empty.
Clearly when I go to these in the contacts option these are all there.
Patently the two are not reconising each other.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
ıan
--
You re
Yes, I guess that's one way, kind of like including debug statements in
code, but rather tedious as you say.
I think I may have hit on what's going on but I'll wait a while for some
more list traffic to come in and then report back if I turn out to be right.
poc
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:00 PM,
Yes, I was using the internet web interface. So are saying that in this
case, 100 is *not* the limit? I know SOME got them but am unsure if all
received. I appreciate your clarifying, not all that savvy, had to ask
husband the answer! Thank you!
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 12:21:01 PM UTC-4, mar
Hello, i had reported a security vulnerability in google from goo.gl/vulnzbut
even after submiting the report, i did not receive any automated reply
from them. I also tried sending them direct email but even then i did not
get any reply. all my friends are getting a reply for all their reports b
Thanks Zack. I understand the principle, it's the application that's
difficult. I have a lot of filters and tracking down exactly why a specific
message is triggering one is non-trivial. I've looked carefully and can't
see anything that would cause this. The filters for these lists are
extremely si
>
> It would be helpful if Gmail had a debugging option to trace exactly which
> filters were triggered by a given message, but I don't know if such a thing
> exists.
>
You could do some debugging yourself, though I realize it could be tedious
if you have many. Maybe there's an XML editor that co
tq.star92@gmail is my gmail account i made it about 2 or 3 years ago,and my
1 facebok account is also associated with this gmail account and i was not
using gmail account for mail and other activity.some day ago i realize that
some access my facebook account through gmail.and reset password. and
Thanks, I understand that. See my reply to Zack for more on this.
poc
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Andy wrote:
> Are there multiple messages in the conversations that persist in the
> Inbox? If you have conversation view ON (the default), if even one message
> in the conversation does not
Right you are billhansen. Luck is the name of the game. Of course it's
easy after the fact to say you should have done this or that. Isn't that
the story of our life as well? Always easy to look in the past with
hindsight.
RL
On Friday, July 19, 2013 7:35:02 PM UTC+8, billhansen wrote:
>
>
Ray Lopez wrote:
As for the spam filter and "People" trick I linked to, your advice seems to
> contradict the linked author's advice.
>
How's that?
I didn't see anything in the link that said all email sent from people not
in your Contacts list is sent to spam. Was it in one of the Comments?
Are there multiple messages in the conversations that persist in the Inbox?
If you have conversation view ON (the default), if even one message in the
conversation does not "Skip the Inbox" (that is, does not match the filter
rules), it makes the whole conversation appear in the Inbox. (Turn
Conv
vukko,
"Gmail does block password-protected Zip files yes, but I've not heard of
it blocking source code (which is just plain text?)." -- oh yes it does
block source code. In fact, I found out when, much to my shock, Google
sent me an automated email saying, essentially, 'please don't send sou
Actually, my common solution for that is to rename all files that ANY mail
service might block (don't get me started on what my Exchange account at
work blocks). I typically just add ".rename" to them. This works to
bypass all "type" blocks that don't want ZIPs, or SRC, or whatever. The
point of
Patrick,
Have you checked your other filters and are sure none of them are firing on
those messages? I've had no problems with the "Skip Inbox" working for me,
in fact this thread has been skipping it perfectly as it was set to do. We
have to remember that according to Google, all filters, inclu
Ray,
Your linked article says a few things that are not entirely true. The
comment about contacts are never sent to spam... is straight from GMail's
help pages, but in practice I've found this to be false. Probably because
of the other problem he's got in there... he implies that gmail filters
w
(Replying to myself)
I turned off the tabbed Inbox. It made no difference.
poc
On Saturday, 13 July 2013 11:57:38 UTC+1, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> I use filters to classify several high-traffic mailing lists. Incoming
> mails are tagged with the appropriate label and do not appear in my In
Andy,
Thanks for the advice, but the horse is out of the barn. A dollar short
and a day late.
The only thing 'non-kosher' I'm doing that I can think of is on occasion I
use a proxy server to spoof where I'm logging in from (right now I'm using
a Japan proxy server, so from the header it loo
While Jeff Grossman may be right, and this problem is not from being an
e-mail message, I for one hate the 'new look' of the Gmails, and the tiny
popup HTML5 box for replies and new messages. What a joke--how can anybody
take Gmail seriously? I use Outlook.com for serious business email
corre
Kenneth,
But if Andy is correct, see downstream of your post in this thread, then
there's no way to 100% replicate what Google Gmail is doing since it's an
'adaptive' or 'learning' spam filter?
Not to broaden the topic of the thread unnecessarily, but this is yet
another reason why online emai
21 matches
Mail list logo
