Re: [Glpi-dev] Petit bilan d'avancement pour la 0.5

2005-02-17 Thread baaz
> To be honest, I proposed the adoption of gettext for GLPI one year ago > but baaz was opposed firmly with the arguments which I evoked above. So > for the moment... > As far i'm concerned, I remenber that I spoke about gettext the first, but that's not here the topic. I wasn't opposed, I just sa

Re: [Glpi-dev] Petit bilan d'avancement pour la 0.5

2005-02-17 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! JMD In chel di` si favelave... > I think that you don't understand what i mean. I am convinced of the > advantages of db indipendence or gettext. It's not the problem. The Ok, effectively i've not understood this. ;) > Ok i think that we'll dissuss on it after the 0.5 version. No prob

Re: [Glpi-dev] Petit bilan d'avancement pour la 0.5

2005-02-17 Thread JMD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marco Gaiarin a écrit : (...) | ...hem, we are slipping in a flame war. Ad is not my intention. ;) | [it's only a bit of bad english... ;] I's not my intention too. I think that it is rather about an animated discussion. () | No, i'm not saying

Re: [Glpi-dev] Petit bilan d'avancement pour la 0.5

2005-02-17 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! JMD In chel di` si favelave... > Yes for you...;) ...hem, we are slipping in a flame war. Ad is not my intention. ;) [it's only a bit of bad english... ;] > Because we are the most stupid developpers in the world ? I hope no... No, i'm not saying that. I'm simply saying that: + db in