> To be honest, I proposed the adoption of gettext for GLPI one year ago > but baaz was opposed firmly with the arguments which I evoked above. So > for the moment... >
As far i'm concerned, I remenber that I spoke about gettext the first, but that's not here the topic. I wasn't opposed, I just sayed that I would not do it, but in perspective nobody can say that gettext is not a better solution than the actual lang system. Now I think we have most important thinks to do on GLPI before doing that. In my mind it may come just before the 1.0 version when there number of features request will fall down under 2 per mounths... So this is only my point of vue not a definitive direction for the project. P.S : I also think it's not as difficult as you can imagine to pass from GLPI struct to gettext, just with an adapted perl (or other) parsing script. -- Bazile