xudong963 commented on PR #15296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15296#issuecomment-2743593315
> Do you know any use cases where this method would be especially useful? If
so, maybe we can study one of those cases in more detail. That could help us
understand the real need a
LindaSummer commented on issue #13775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13775#issuecomment-2746049186
Hi @Speculative ,
Thanks very much for your investigation! ❤
I'm sorry that in last month due to my personal circumstances, I didn't have
enough time to follow
alamb commented on issue #15323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15323#issuecomment-2744217807
Makes sense -- with 183 spill files, we probably would need to merge in
stages
For example starting with 183 spill files
1. run 10 jobs, each merging about 10 files into
Dandandan commented on code in PR #15266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15266#discussion_r2008942439
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/first_last.rs:
##
@@ -179,6 +292,420 @@ impl AggregateUDFImpl for FirstValue {
}
}
+struct FirstPrimitiveGroupsAccu
ozankabak commented on code in PR #15339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15339#discussion_r2008738870
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain_tree.slt:
##
@@ -345,63 +345,68 @@ FROM
physical_plan
01)┌───┐
-02)│CoalesceBat
goldmedal commented on code in PR #15159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15159#discussion_r2008701304
##
datafusion/sql/tests/cases/plan_to_sql.rs:
##
@@ -633,6 +633,18 @@ fn roundtrip_statement_with_dialect() -> Result<()> {
parser_dialect: Box::new
Omega359 commented on PR #15101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15101#issuecomment-2743066275
@alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r2008764438
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -771,3 +871,82 @@ fn record_batch_into_schema(
RecordBatch::try_new(schema, data_arrays)
}
+
+/// This is a helper funct
qazxcdswe123 commented on code in PR #15356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15356#discussion_r2008792246
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate-common/src/aggregate/avg_distinct/decimal.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
alamb opened a new issue, #15357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15357
I think the current code tests the re-exported Parquet functionalities, not
touching the DataFusion-related code. Ideally, we should test the end-to-end
Parquet reading process.
The process rough
jsai28 commented on issue #15357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15357#issuecomment-2745315413
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
alamb commented on issue #15321:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15321#issuecomment-2745343112
BTW I am not sure the code is really in a great position to do this one yet
-- it might help to wait for @2010YOUY01 (or help him) to pull some of the
spilling code into its own
Omega359 commented on PR #15341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15341#issuecomment-2745343678
> However, I am struggling to understand the implications of this change to
a user. Like for example, if we were going to add a note about this in the
upgrade / release notes, what
xudong963 closed issue #15290: Support `merge` for `Distribution`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15290
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
xudong963 closed pull request #15296: feat: support merge for `Distribution`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15296
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
timsaucer commented on PR #1074:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1074#issuecomment-2745345231
Let me know when it's ready for review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
xudong963 commented on PR #15296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15296#issuecomment-2745345742
Thanks for your suggestions!! @alamb @ozankabak @berkaysynnada and @kosiew
I'll continue to do such work after the `Migrate to Distribution from
Precision` work is done. I t
timsaucer commented on PR #1074:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1074#issuecomment-2745345097
I do love this PR. I hadn't looked at it since it's in draft, but I fully
endorse.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
riziles closed issue #1077: DeltaLake integration not working (Python) (FFI
Table providers not working)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1077
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
westhide commented on PR #1212:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1212#issuecomment-2743805128
> I believe whole job should be cancelled
Yes, working on it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
XiangpengHao commented on PR #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/61#issuecomment-2745401638
Thank you @kevinjqliu
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1048: build(deps): bump
datafusion-substrait from 45.0.0 to 46.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1048
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1051:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1051#issuecomment-2745403955
Looks like datafusion is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1049:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1049#issuecomment-2745403935
Looks like datafusion-proto is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1050: build(deps): bump datafusion-ffi
from 45.0.0 to 46.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1050
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1049: build(deps): bump datafusion-proto
from 45.0.0 to 46.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1049
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1068:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1068#issuecomment-2745403994
Looks like uuid is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1048:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1048#issuecomment-2745403927
Looks like datafusion-substrait is up-to-date now, so this is no longer
needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1038: build(deps): bump arrow from 54.2.0
to 54.2.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1038
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
timsaucer merged PR #1079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1079
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
iffyio merged PR #1769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1769
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #1079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1079
# Which issue does this PR close?
None
# Rationale for this change
In preparing for the next release, update the datafusion dependency.
# What changes are includ
alamb commented on code in PR #15353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15353#discussion_r2008792240
##
docs/source/library-user-guide/adding-udfs.md:
##
@@ -1160,6 +1160,89 @@ async fn main() -> Result<()> {
// +---+
```
+## Custom Expression Planning
+
+DataFu
riziles commented on issue #1077:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1077#issuecomment-2745324305
@timsaucer , I upgraded deltalake to 0.25.4 and datafusion to 45.2.0, and
the example above now works fine. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
alamb commented on code in PR #15168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15168#discussion_r2008804385
##
datafusion/spark/src/function/math/expm1.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license a
alamb commented on code in PR #15341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15341#discussion_r2008804758
##
datafusion/optimizer/tests/optimizer_integration.rs:
##
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ fn push_down_filter_groupby_expr_contains_alias() {
let sql = "SELECT * FROM (SEL
Omega359 commented on code in PR #15341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15341#discussion_r2008808511
##
datafusion/optimizer/tests/optimizer_integration.rs:
##
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ fn push_down_filter_groupby_expr_contains_alias() {
let sql = "SELECT * FROM (
alamb commented on issue #15359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15359#issuecomment-2745343956
Instructions to update the expected results are in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/sqllogictest/README.md#running-tests-sqlite
--
This is an automated
logan-keede opened a new issue, #15360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15360
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
DataFusion has many dependencies that leads to increased binary size and
compilation while saving us the trouble of maintaining
deanm commented on PR #1074:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1074#issuecomment-2745349544
I'll mark it ready and just do a second PR for more methods.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
qazxcdswe123 commented on code in PR #15356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15356#discussion_r2008777574
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -6686,3 +6688,35 @@ SELECT a, median(b), arrow_typeof(median(b)) FROM
group_median_all_nulls GROUP
alamb opened a new issue, #15359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15359
### Describe the bug
example
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/runs/14005503215/job/39218865563
```
External error: query is expected to fail with error:
(regex)
alamb commented on PR #1772:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1772#issuecomment-2745343279
Thank you all for keeping this train (of PRs) rolling. Very impressive I
must say
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
timsaucer commented on PR #1074:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1074#issuecomment-2745373049
At a high level I like some of the aspects of a namespace. It would
especially be nice to clean up our documentation using them in `functions`. I
haven't thought through what
ozankabak commented on issue #15360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15360#issuecomment-2745373075
If we can write a script to approximately estimate "how much" of an external
crate we are using, we can create a starter list of candidates for this
--
This is an automated
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1050:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1050#issuecomment-2745404001
Looks like datafusion-ffi is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1051: build(deps): bump datafusion from
45.0.0 to 46.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1051
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1038:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1038#issuecomment-2745403943
Looks like arrow is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
alamb commented on code in PR #15354:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15354#discussion_r2008786953
##
datafusion/functions-nested/src/array_has.rs:
##
@@ -121,6 +123,43 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for ArrayHas {
Ok(DataType::Boolean)
}
+fn simplify(
qazxcdswe123 opened a new pull request, #15356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15356
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #2408
## Rationale for this change
Related: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15099
## What changes are included
deanm commented on PR #1074:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1074#issuecomment-2745350211
@timsaucer did you have any thoughts on the namespaces because going from
this to that would wind up being a breaking change.
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
XiangpengHao commented on PR #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/61#issuecomment-2745351963
Thank you @alamb @comphead @Omega359 @kevinjqliu I believe all comments have
been addressed!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
kevinjqliu commented on code in PR #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/61#discussion_r2008823867
##
content/blog/2025-03-21-parquet-pushdown.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Efficient Filter Pushdown in Parquet
+date: 2025-03-21
+author: X
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1080
Bumps [mimalloc](https://github.com/purpleprotocol/mimalloc_rust) from
0.1.43 to 0.1.44.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/purpleprotocol/mimalloc_rust/releases"
westhide commented on PR #1212:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1212#issuecomment-2745126578
> ah no, sorry for misunderstanding please do not cancel this PR. what I
meant, in case of this type of error, ballista job should be cancelled.
Hello @milenkovicm, Ca
Shreyaskr1409 commented on PR #15313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15313#issuecomment-2745028266
@alamb @blaginin I have resolved all the conversations. Please look into it.
Also my bad for few unnecessary commits here and there, I am still getting
acquainted with the wo
westhide opened a new issue, #1214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1214
**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
Ballista client keep blocking when prepare_task_definition or
prepare_multi_task_definition fail
**To Repro
alamb commented on issue #15343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15343#issuecomment-2745139051
I wonder if we could just change the default format for `datafusion-cli` (it
is a config setting) 🤔 Downstream projects could also then "opt-in" if they
wanted nicer default expl
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #15348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15348#issuecomment-2745186535
Updated the result for short string sort which will benefit a lot from
StringView type, add Q 11 for sort:
```rust
-const SORT_QUERIES: [&'static str; 10] = [
+
ozankabak commented on PR #15287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15287#issuecomment-2745187508
This PR seems to have broken `main`.
@alamb -- Extended tests break very frequently these days. We should
prioritize completing the work on running them before merge.
--
T
alamb commented on code in PR #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/63#discussion_r2008719590
##
content/blog/2025-03-20-datafusion-comet-0.7.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion Comet 0.7.0 Release
+date: 2025-03-20
+author:
alamb commented on PR #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/63#issuecomment-2745149502
Released site:
https://datafusion.apache.org/blog/2025/03/20/datafusion-comet-0.7.0/ 👍
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
timsaucer commented on issue #1077:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1077#issuecomment-2745248393
Which version of datafusion-python are you using? If you have 45.2.0 can you
please try downgrading to 44.0.0? If that solves it, I know what the problem is.
--
This i
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r2008766096
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -111,56 +116,151 @@ impl PyDataFrame {
}
fn __repr__(&self, py: Python) -> PyDataFusionResult {
-let df = se
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r2008764218
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -771,3 +871,82 @@ fn record_batch_into_schema(
RecordBatch::try_new(schema, data_arrays)
}
+
+/// This is a helper funct
timsaucer opened a new issue, #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1078
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
This is a follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #15355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15355
## Which issue does this PR close?
Related to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14975
## Rationale for this change
### What's the inefficiency
Let's w
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r2008764621
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -70,6 +72,9 @@ impl PyTableProvider {
PyTable::new(table_provider)
}
}
+const MAX_TABLE_BYTES_TO_DISPLAY: usize =
timsaucer commented on code in PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#discussion_r2008766157
##
src/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -111,56 +116,151 @@ impl PyDataFrame {
}
fn __repr__(&self, py: Python) -> PyDataFusionResult {
-let df = se
goldmedal commented on code in PR #15334:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15334#discussion_r2008714660
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q22.slt.part:
##
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ logical_plan
07)Projection: customer.c_phone, customer.c_acctbal
ozankabak commented on issue #15343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15343#issuecomment-2745139974
> I wonder if we could just change the default format for `datafusion-cli`
(it is a config setting) 🤔 Downstream projects could also then "opt-in" if they
wanted nicer default
qazxcdswe123 commented on issue #2408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2408#issuecomment-2745155964
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on code in PR #15325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15325#discussion_r2008783615
##
datafusion/wasmtest/src/lib.rs:
##
@@ -182,4 +182,29 @@ mod test {
let task_ctx = ctx.task_ctx();
let _ = collect(physical_plan, task_ctx).await
alamb commented on PR #15313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15313#issuecomment-2745294370
> @alamb @blaginin I have resolved all the conversations. Please look into
it. Also my bad for few unnecessary commits here and there, I am still getting
acquainted with the workflow.
alamb commented on PR #15325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15325#issuecomment-2745294019
Thanks again @pranavJibhakate
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
timsaucer merged PR #1036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
alamb merged PR #15325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15325
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #15313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15313#issuecomment-2745294680
i took a look at the most recent commits and it looks good to me. Thanks
again @Shreyaskr1409 !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
alamb merged PR #15313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15313
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #15348:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15348#discussion_r2008785345
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/cursor.rs:
##
@@ -281,6 +281,33 @@ impl CursorArray for GenericByteArray
{
}
}
+impl CursorArray for StringViewArray {
alamb opened a new issue, #15358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15358
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Breaking rationale from
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14975#issue-2890626662 into its own
ticket:
For memory-
alamb closed issue #15158: Add test coverage for wasm32 + parquet build
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15158
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
alamb commented on PR #15355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15355#issuecomment-2745303386
- I filed https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15358 to track the
feature request, and linked this ticket
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
alamb commented on issue #15177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15177#issuecomment-2740983293
BTW combined with @adriangb's PR here
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301
It will likely go crazy fast 🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
alamb commented on code in PR #15355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15355#discussion_r2008788363
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -230,9 +219,14 @@ struct ExternalSorter {
/// if `Self::in_mem_batches` are sorted
in_mem_batches_sort
alamb commented on PR #15355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15355#issuecomment-2745309065
> There are two extra operators that can be changed to this new interface
(Aggregate and SortMergeJoin), they're planned to be included in this PR. I
plan to do it after getting some
omar commented on code in PR #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/61#discussion_r2008990238
##
content/blog/2025-03-21-parquet-pushdown.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Efficient Filter Pushdown in Parquet
+date: 2025-03-21
+author: Xiangpe
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #15355:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15355#discussion_r2009004733
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -230,9 +219,14 @@ struct ExternalSorter {
/// if `Self::in_mem_batches` are sorted
in_mem_batches
LuQQiu commented on PR #15039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15039#issuecomment-2741622696
@alamb @Weijun-H Thanks for the review!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
alamb merged PR #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/62
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusio
TheBuilderJR commented on PR #15295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15295#issuecomment-2745948813
Nice! Fwiw another edge case I found recently that's probably worth testing
is a List where the Struct evolves. I ended up solving it by updating
list_coersion but curious if yo
friendlymatthew opened a new pull request, #15361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15361
Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14536
## Rationale for this change
Datafusion currently errs when attempting to format a date using
time-related specifiers
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1614:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1614#issuecomment-2745969727
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or
93 matches
Mail list logo
