zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948599651
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/enforce_sorting/mod.rs:
##
@@ -373,9 +373,10 @@ pub fn ensure_sorting(
return adjust_window_sort_removal(requirem
eliaperantoni commented on code in PR #14521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14521#discussion_r1948557193
##
datafusion/sql/tests/cases/diagnostic.rs:
##
@@ -201,14 +201,8 @@ fn test_ambiguous_reference() -> Result<()> {
let diag = do_query(query);
asse
eliaperantoni commented on issue #14433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14433#issuecomment-2647246100
Hey @alan910127, sorry for the delay, thank you so much for taking on this
ticket!
I suggest you look at `datafusion/sql/tests/cases/diagnostic.rs` and create
a tes
pmcgleenon commented on issue #14246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14246#issuecomment-2647256168
FYI the [Clickbench PR](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/304)
has been merged and the latest Datafusion `45.0.0` results have been published
on the site https://
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #14573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14573
Bumps [strum](https://github.com/Peternator7/strum) from 0.26.3 to 0.27.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/Peternator7/strum/releases";>strum's
releases.
v0.
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948589383
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948589383
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#discussion_r1948589383
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -1943,6 +1943,30 @@ async fn test_remove_unnecessary_spm1() -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
ctsk commented on PR #14566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14566#issuecomment-2647275498
## Micro-benchmark results
- `group_ordering_$n` benchmarks the partial group ordering where the
ordering contains $n columns. Each Columns consists of 8192 Int32s.
```
Groennbeck opened a new pull request, #1720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1720
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
hayman42 opened a new issue, #1382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1382
### Describe the bug
First of all, thank you guys for such a great project. I am currently doing
some research to see if our team can make use of datafusion comet to our
workload.
A
EmilyMatt opened a new pull request, #1383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1383
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1344
## Rationale for this change
Should optimize incremental compilation and allow for much faster
development and tests cyc
logan-keede commented on PR #14555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14555#issuecomment-2647881291
Thanks for the review, @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb merged PR #14573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14573
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
xudong963 commented on PR #14578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14578#issuecomment-2647931037
Thanks @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
xudong963 merged PR #14578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2647942928
Ah, I see the snmalloc comes from running
```
docs/source/user-guide/crate-configuration.md
```
I think the issue there is that snmalloc takes over the global alloca
alamb commented on issue #14580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14580#issuecomment-2647987276
I personally plan to focus on
- 🚀 performance: Help complete the advanced parquet predicate pushdown with
@XiangpengHao https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3463
- 🔨
askalt commented on PR #14327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14327#issuecomment-2647985607
@berkaysynnada Could you check please?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2648007180
I plan to merge this PR in once the tests pass
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
alamb commented on PR #14521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14521#issuecomment-2648008182
Thanks everyone! This is epic
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
alamb merged PR #14521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14521
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#issuecomment-2648142854
Marking as a draft as I don't think this is waiting for review anymore (nor
have we figured out a consensus either)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
andygrove commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949145745
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_disco
xudong963 commented on PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#issuecomment-2648148207
> This makes sense to me -- thank you @xudong963
>
> In general it seems like we have a class of bugs related to removing
`fetch` -- maybe we should re-evaluate `enforce_sort
findepi commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949089345
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_discoun
milenkovicm commented on issue #1178:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1178#issuecomment-2648167946
I believe this is duplicate of #1044
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
jonahgao commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2648181791
> Should we move `TypeCoercion` into builder 🤔 ?
I also thought about that, but some users do not want the casts introduced
by `TypeCoercion`. See
https://github.co
xudong963 merged PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
xudong963 commented on PR #14569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14569#issuecomment-2648194193
Thanks all, let's go!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
milenkovicm commented on issue #1179:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1179#issuecomment-2648199437
`./dev/build-ballista-docker.sh` works with latest master, please use latest
master, we can't really provide support for older branches
--
This is an automated me
alamb commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2648317619
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) I'll also do some updates in the issue
summary.
>
> Considering that this is the first time I've been involved in this
process, could y
alamb closed issue #14557: Hide boilerplate in documentation examples
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
logan-keede commented on issue #13270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13270#issuecomment-2648393486
@adriangb my focus has been on refactoring `FileScanConfig` to move it out
of core. I cant say I understand the internals that much, but I will look into
it and mention it h
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2648403884
🚀
Thanks again @ugoa -- this is great work
FYI @tshauck who I think started this documentation many months ago
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
alamb merged PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #14435: Run / Test all examples in Documentation
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14435
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
findepi closed issue #11513: [Proposal] Decouple logical from physical types
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
findepi commented on issue #11513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/11513#issuecomment-2648438472
Discussion continues under
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12622. Let me close this one. I
don't think there is a benefit of keeping two issues open for single topic
nantunes opened a new pull request, #14584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14584
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14583.
## Rationale for this change
When executing DELETE statements with case-sensitive quoted table names, the
table name was i
logan-keede opened a new pull request, #14585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14585
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Part of #1.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
Refactor of `FileSinkConfig` and
alamb commented on PR #14367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14367#issuecomment-2648334436
> @alamb could you also get a clarification over the inclusion of wyhash
functions as well? It was also requested under the same issue
[here](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issue
alamb commented on PR #14367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14367#issuecomment-2648336196
So unless there are many users (and ideally maintainers) of new functions, I
am hesitant to add new ones
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
alamb commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2648320294
@xudong963 when would you like to start making the release? Maybe we should
targe the week of Feb 24 🤔
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
lgingerich commented on PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#issuecomment-2648325869
@alamb Should be fixed now. I just didn't have the language of the test
properly matching this new function.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
ugoa commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2648417980
My pleasure! I learned a lot during the time as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
nantunes opened a new issue, #14583:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14583
### Describe the bug
When executing a DELETE statement with a case-sensitive quoted table name,
the table name is incorrectly normalized to lowercase, causing "table not
found" errors.
alamb commented on issue #14576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576#issuecomment-2647795542
It would be amazing to be able to run these tests prior to merge to main, see
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14319
That might be what I try and help along f
alamb commented on issue #13570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13570#issuecomment-2647797989
Thanks @dhegberg -- I am not sure if that is desired or not -- maybe it is
worth a ticket
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #14579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14579
## Which issue does this PR close?
Addresses part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14562 -
specifically scalar udfs
## Rationale for this change
This is a pure
alamb commented on code in PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#discussion_r1949026721
##
docs/rustdoc_trim.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE
alamb commented on issue #14549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14549#issuecomment-2647794572
> Extended tests are still failing
Thanks. Yeah it seems they worked for one commit
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7159d97-6188-4b05-94ea-db2768e713
alamb opened a new issue, #14576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576
### Describe the bug
- Follow on on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14549
The extended tests are failing again
Here is an example:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/ac
ugoa closed pull request #14544: Test all examples from library-user-guide &
user-guide docs
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb commented on code in PR #14555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14555#discussion_r1948945841
##
datafusion/core/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ array_expressions = ["nested_expressions"]
# Used to enable the avro format
avro = ["apache-avro", "num-traits"
alamb merged PR #14555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14555
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2647984070
Making the examples in the doc rendred with `sql` rather than ``` was a
great idea. However, since those files are automatically generated from the
source code we need to update the ge
alamb commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2648205592
So close...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
oznur-synnada opened a new pull request, #14582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14582
## Which issue does this PR close?
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested?
adriangb commented on code in PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#discussion_r1949194705
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -1710,6 +1717,56 @@ fn build_like_match(
Some(combined)
}
+// For predicate `col NOT LIKE 'foo%'`,
alamb commented on issue #5600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5600#issuecomment-2648221037
> Since we're planning of having a separate mode for spark wherein a user
can access all spark functions and also not make the main code dependent on
this crate, I was thinking if t
alamb commented on code in PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#discussion_r1949200715
##
datafusion/expr/src/test/function_stub.rs:
##
@@ -125,9 +125,7 @@ impl AggregateUDFImpl for Sum {
}
fn coerce_types(&self, arg_types: &[DataType]) ->
adriangb commented on issue #13270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13270#issuecomment-2648246475
@logan-keede I see you're doing some work on `FileScanConfig`. Would it be
relevant to consider what needs to be changed to fix this?
--
This is an automated message from the
alamb commented on PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#issuecomment-2648250092
Thank you so much @lgingerich
I started the CI checks
FYI When I ran some of the tests locally I saw some failures which seem to
be related:
```
cargo test
alamb commented on PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#issuecomment-2648247269
FYI @findepi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Spaarsh commented on PR #14367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14367#issuecomment-2648257379
@alamb could you also get a clarification over the inclusion of wyhash
functions as well? It was also requested under the same issue
[here](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issue
Spaarsh commented on issue #5600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5600#issuecomment-2648452637
> I think that would be ok (maybe implement this in datafusion-cli)
I'm sorry if I'm got this wrong, you're suggesting that we could make an
import command in the datafusion
logan-keede commented on PR #14585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14585#issuecomment-2648480794
cc @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
lgingerich commented on PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#issuecomment-2648489071
I'll check out these new errors later today.
Is there a simple way to run all these tests locally without manually
running each of the difference cargo test combinations? (I
alamb commented on PR #14525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14525#issuecomment-2648504081
> I'll check out these new errors later today.
>
> Is there a simple way to run all these tests locally without manually
running each of the difference cargo test combinations? (
benrsatori opened a new pull request, #1721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1721
Add support for PostgreSQL and Redshift geometric operators, enabling
calculations and comparisons for geometric data types like points, lines, and
polygons.
alamb opened a new issue, #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
The [ClickBench Benchmark](https://benchmark.clickhouse.com/) measures the
performance of filtering and aggregation
Being on t
Spaarsh opened a new issue, #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14588
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
As we increase the number of functions in our core, it might lead to an
increased runtime footprint for datafusion-cli in the futur
Spaarsh commented on issue #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14588#issuecomment-2648658163
I am willing to work on this issue once it is validated by the community.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Omega359 commented on issue #14536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14536#issuecomment-2648671927
> I had the impression (although perhaps it is dated) that datafusion sought
to be compatible with postgres to the extent reasonable. Assuming thats still
the case is there a r
alamb commented on issue #14246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14246#issuecomment-2648548383
Filed a ticket for running this on 46
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14587
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648625729
> > I am trying a poc about support block approach by only modifying codes
of group values(we also need to modifying codes of GroupAccumulatortoo in
[#11943](https://github.co
alamb commented on PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14331#issuecomment-2648628261
I merged this test up from main
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
dhegberg commented on issue #13570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13570#issuecomment-2648541644
I think I'll post my documentation change without the named arguments. I'll
then take a stab as adding support for named arguments with EXECUTE.
--
This is an automated mess
alamb commented on issue #14246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14246#issuecomment-2648540431
> Nice! Looks we have some more competition now from DuckDB:...
- Filed https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586 to start up the
optimization machine
--
This is
benrsatori closed pull request #1721: Add support for PostgreSQL and Redshift
geometric operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1721
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
alamb commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648610440
> I am trying a poc about support block approach by only modifying codes of
group values(we also need to modifying codes of GroupAccumulatortoo in
https://github.com/apache/datafu
alamb commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648588773
I took a brief look at [some
results](https://benchmark.clickhouse.com/#eyJzeXN0ZW0iOnsiQWxsb3lEQiI6ZmFsc2UsIkFsbG95REIgKHR1bmVkKSI6ZmFsc2UsIkF0aGVuYSAocGFydGl0aW9uZWQpIjpmYWxzZSwi
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648602542
A low hanging fruit #13617, i plan to finish it in this week.
And maybe it is time to push #11943 forward...
I am trying a poc about support `block approach` by `
alamb commented on issue #13983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13983#issuecomment-2648602300
Discussion about making more improvements:
- https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/C04RJ0C85UZ/p1739204225620989
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
alamb opened a new issue, #14587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14587
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
- Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13983
dhegberg commented on issue #13570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13570#issuecomment-2648544296
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648640934
For optimizer side, I suspect if `single_distinct_to_groupby` can really
improve performance in current version?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
alamb commented on issue #14576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576#issuecomment-2648636639
I noticed that the github runner generated several warnings about diskspace
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/918fb3a4-1149-41b7-9027-e62721ac8800";
/>
--
andygrove commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949552271
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_disco
parthchandra commented on PR #1376:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1376#issuecomment-2648702671
@andygrove updates this to fallback, updated the unit tests and removed the
draft tag
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
wForget opened a new pull request, #14575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14575
## Which issue does this PR close?
minor fix
## Rationale for this change
Check string size overflow before string repeat build to fail fast and save
memory.
## What ch
alamb closed issue #14246: Update ClickBench benchmarks with DataFusion
`45.0.0` (When Published)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14246
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
alamb commented on issue #14246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14246#issuecomment-2647733813
> FYI the [Clickbench PR](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/pull/304)
has been merged and the latest Datafusion `45.0.0` results have been published
on the site https://ben
Groennbeck commented on PR #1122:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1122#issuecomment-2647707391
> Hi @Groennbeck are you still planning on update this PR?
Hey! sorry has been busy. I can have a look this week.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
ugoa commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2647808359
The `cmake` needs to be installed in setup-builder because it is required by
`snmalloc-rs = "0.3"`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
ozankabak opened a new issue, #14577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14577
## Introduction
Welcome to the Apache DataFusion Google Summer of Code (GSoC) application
guidelines. We are excited to support contributors who are passionate about
open-source data processi
parthchandra commented on code in PR #1374:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1374#discussion_r1948989419
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CometTestBase.scala:
##
@@ -116,12 +116,49 @@ abstract class CometTestBase
require(absTol > 0 && absTol
alamb commented on code in PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#discussion_r1948995913
##
datafusion/core/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -152,6 +154,8 @@ serde_json = { workspace = true }
sysinfo = "0.33.1"
test-utils = { path = "../../test-utils" }
tokio = { wo
timsaucer commented on issue #1017:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1017#issuecomment-2647858283
@Spaarsh I've put up a *draft* PR for the scalar udf, but it has a few
points that need cleaning up still:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14579
One thi
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
