Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-06-19 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15490: feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-06-10 Thread via GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2961018338 Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment or

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-04-05 Thread via GitHub
prowang01 commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2767268386 > This PR has several CI failures so marking as a draft while they are addressed. (I do this to make it easier to see what PRs are waiting on review) Thank you for the feedba

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-04-04 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2767072034 This PR has several CI failures so marking as a draft while they are addressed. (I do this to make it easier to see what PRs are waiting on review) -- This is an automated messa

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-04-04 Thread via GitHub
prowang01 commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2768371753 Hey @eliaperantoni, Thanks for the detailed review. I totally understand your concerns and just wanted to say I’m really sorry if my work came across as rushed or dishonest —

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-04-01 Thread via GitHub
eliaperantoni commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2768344530 I think this issue is being planned and discussed in a much more robust and future proof way by @Chen-Yuan-Lai and @dentiny in #14432 -- This is an automated message from the

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-03-31 Thread via GitHub
eliaperantoni commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2768341633 Also you made the PR ready for review again, after @alamb, made it a draft, without first committing any new changes? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-03-31 Thread via GitHub
eliaperantoni commented on code in PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#discussion_r2022232702 ## datafusion/common/src/utils/mod.rs: ## @@ -979,16 +981,19 @@ pub fn take_function_args( ) -> Result<[T; N]> { let args = args.into_iter().collect::>

Re: [PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-03-30 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2764498764 FYI @eliaperantoni -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment

[PR] feat(sql): add diagnostic for wrong number of function arguments [datafusion]

2025-03-29 Thread via GitHub
prowang01 opened a new pull request, #15490: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490 ## Which issue does this PR close? Closes #14432 Relates to #14429 ## Rationale for this change This PR adds a user-facing diagnostic when a SQL function is called with