Copilot commented on code in PR #15520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15520#discussion_r2022259546
##
datafusion/execution/src/disk_manager.rs:
##
@@ -164,6 +216,50 @@ impl RefCountedTempFile {
pub fn inner(&self) -> &NamedTempFile {
&self.tempfile
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #15520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15520
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15358
## Rationale for this change
See the rationale part of the first attempt PR
https://github.com/apache/datafusion
eliaperantoni commented on PR #15490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#issuecomment-2768341633
Also you made the PR ready for review again, after @alamb, made it a draft,
without first committing any new changes?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
eliaperantoni commented on code in PR #15490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15490#discussion_r2022232702
##
datafusion/common/src/utils/mod.rs:
##
@@ -979,16 +981,19 @@ pub fn take_function_args(
) -> Result<[T; N]> {
let args = args.into_iter().collect::>
berkaysynnada commented on PR #15503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15503#issuecomment-2768177113
> > I suggest modifying the existing API, not a new one.
>
> Which one do you think is suitable to modify, `statistics()`?
yes
--
This is an automated message fr
xudong963 merged PR #15432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15432
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
xudong963 opened a new issue, #15519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15519
I suggest writing this logic with a state machine, which polls
files at one point only. I believe FSM's would increase the code quality and
understandability
_Originally posted
kazuyukitanimura merged PR #1578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsub
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #15501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15501#issuecomment-2768105998
Thank you for the review!
> I think we should consider the random seed along with the runtime of this
test, but otherwise it looks really nice
It's using a random sta
2010YOUY01 opened a new issue, #15517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15517
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
A new sort query fuzzer for out-of-core sorting has been added in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15501.
However,
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #15518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15518
## Which issue does this PR close?
Since we have merged the utf8view support for aggregate topk, so also add
the corresponding benchmark code in this PR.
https://github.com/apach
xudong963 merged PR #15502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15502
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #15501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15501#discussion_r2022130464
##
datafusion/core/tests/fuzz_cases/sort_query_fuzz.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,635 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contribu
alamb commented on code in PR #15501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15501#discussion_r2021936887
##
datafusion/core/tests/fuzz_cases/sort_query_fuzz.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,635 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor l
wForget opened a new issue, #1586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1586
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
I found several possible optimizations for native scan by profiling
CometReadBenchmark.
1. Snappy decompression performance is poor
adriangb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2022103675
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/topk/mod.rs:
##
@@ -186,6 +235,90 @@ impl TopK {
Ok(())
}
+fn calculate_dynamic_filters(
+thresholds:
wForget opened a new pull request, #1587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1587
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1571.
## Rationale for this change
Respect `batchSize/workerThreads/blockingThreads` configurations for
native_iceberg_c
Omega359 closed issue #14563: Perf: Dataframe with_column and
with_column_renamed are slow
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14563
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jayzhan211 opened a new pull request, #15516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15516
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes test
MichaelScofield opened a new pull request, #1788:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1788
GreptimeDB uses sqlparser in its "RANGE" syntax, and various other places.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
suibianwanwank commented on PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#issuecomment-2767929587
>And follow the model of evaluation for
[Literal](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/physical-expr/src/expressions/literal.rs)
>
>Except you would
matthewmturner commented on issue #15498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15498#issuecomment-2767914670
I have vague recollection that `Arc` was only faster than cloning a
`String` when there was very little contention due to locking used by `Arc`
internally. If there was a
Jiashu-Hu closed pull request #15514: Update user guide to note decimal is not
experimental anymore
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15514
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
qstommyshu commented on code in PR #15499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15499#discussion_r2021991253
##
datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs:
##
@@ -157,219 +157,282 @@ fn parse_ident_normalization() {
#[test]
fn select_no_relation() {
-quick_test(
-
qstommyshu commented on code in PR #15499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15499#discussion_r2021991253
##
datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs:
##
@@ -157,219 +157,282 @@ fn parse_ident_normalization() {
#[test]
fn select_no_relation() {
-quick_test(
-
andygrove commented on issue #3418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3418#issuecomment-2767628869
> Is this still an issue [@andygrove](https://github.com/andygrove) ?
No, I will go ahead and close this. Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
xudong963 commented on PR #15473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15473#issuecomment-2767850478
Thank you, @leoyvens!
I plan to add tests for the PR in the next two days, and then we can
continue to move it forward. Thanks for all your review!
--
This is an automated
xudong963 commented on PR #15503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15503#issuecomment-2767823416
> I suggest modifying the existing API, not a new one.
Which one do you think is suitable to modify, `statistics()`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
alamb closed issue #12650: Add some DataFrame method(s) to combine two inputs
where the schema can be different
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12650
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
jayzhan211 commented on issue #15511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15511#issuecomment-2767724669
> There has been a number of issues where benchmarks stopped working and no
one noticed until someone happened to try and run them
Instead of running the benchmark, how
parthchandra commented on issue #1576:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1576#issuecomment-2767719365
> [@andygrove](https://github.com/andygrove) sorry for the confusion here,
my cluster is on Spark 3.5.0, and Comet 0.7.0 prebuilt JAR did not work on it
>
> [@pa
alamb commented on issue #15498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15498#issuecomment-2767680544
> @alamb would you mind giving an example on Arc ?
Here is one example
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/923bfb7fc7cf1718522f572b74f3756d02652933/datafusion/c
alamb merged PR #15508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15508
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #15499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15499#issuecomment-2767687638
FYI @blaginin
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on code in PR #15499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15499#discussion_r2021931938
##
datafusion/sql/tests/sql_integration.rs:
##
@@ -157,219 +157,282 @@ fn parse_ident_normalization() {
#[test]
fn select_no_relation() {
-quick_test(
-
andygrove commented on code in PR #1511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1511#discussion_r2021921381
##
native/core/src/execution/shuffle/shuffle_writer.rs:
##
@@ -667,175 +740,322 @@ impl Debug for ShuffleRepartitioner {
}
}
-/// The status of appen
alamb commented on PR #15500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15500#issuecomment-2767682615
> I think we may need to augment the github extended tests to run all the
benchmarks, not to validate the results (though we can do that later) but to
just make sure the benchmarks sti
timsaucer commented on PR #1073:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1073#issuecomment-2766787598
I don't think these changes make a substantive difference to the example.
One of the main goals of the examples to be as simple and clear as possible for
new users to underst
adriangb commented on issue #15309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15309#issuecomment-2766488794
Hmm are you saying that they're using wildcards which we don't support, but
they happen to work for local filesystem so they're getting away with it? If so
yes I think it's wor
andygrove commented on code in PR #1511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1511#discussion_r2021913440
##
native/core/src/execution/shuffle/shuffle_writer.rs:
##
@@ -667,175 +740,322 @@ impl Debug for ShuffleRepartitioner {
}
}
-/// The status of appen
Jiashu-Hu opened a new pull request, #15515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15515
## Which issue does this PR close?
- [Closes #15464](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15464).
## Rationale for this change
The Decimal support in DataF
Jiashu-Hu opened a new pull request, #15514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15514
## Which issue does this PR close?
- [Closes #15464](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15464).
## Rationale for this change
The Decimal support in DataF
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1582
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## How are these changes
kazuyukitanimura merged PR #1580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1580
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsub
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #1580:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1580#issuecomment-2767522455
Thanks @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
andygrove merged PR #1566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1566
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
andygrove closed issue #1562: Push down data filter for native_iceberg_compat
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1562
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
andygrove commented on code in PR #1580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1580#discussion_r2021819064
##
docs/source/user-guide/installation.md:
##
@@ -30,22 +30,32 @@ Make sure the following requirements are met and software
installed on your mach
### Su
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #1578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1578#discussion_r2021779171
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/comet/CometNativeScanExec.scala:
##
@@ -53,29 +55,50 @@ case class CometNativeScanExec(
disableBucke
mbutrovich commented on code in PR #1578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1578#discussion_r2021782172
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/comet/CometNativeScanExec.scala:
##
@@ -53,29 +55,50 @@ case class CometNativeScanExec(
disableBucketedSca
alamb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021746142
##
datafusion/core/src/datasource/physical_plan/parquet.rs:
##
@@ -1769,13 +1775,13 @@ mod tests {
let sql = "select * from base_table where name='test02'";
kazuyukitanimura merged PR #1555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1555
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsub
alamb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021737787
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/filter.rs:
##
@@ -433,6 +433,22 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for FilterExec {
}
try_embed_projection(projection, self)
alamb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021737787
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/filter.rs:
##
@@ -433,6 +433,22 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for FilterExec {
}
try_embed_projection(projection, self)
Omega359 commented on issue #15511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15511#issuecomment-2767313655
Sure. https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5504
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
adriangb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021713556
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/filter.rs:
##
@@ -433,6 +433,22 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for FilterExec {
}
try_embed_projection(projection, self)
alamb commented on issue #15511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15511#issuecomment-2767310181
I would persoanlly suggest if we are going to run the benchmarks we should
also be actively tracking them / making sure they are measuring something
useful.
--
This is an auto
alamb opened a new issue, #15512:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15512
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
This is a collection of various items related to "dynamic filtering"
Roughly speaking dynamic filters are filters who values ar
berkaysynnada commented on PR #15504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15504#issuecomment-2767270135
Very nice example, thank you @Shreyaskr1409. Perhaps we can make this in
datafusion-examples as well?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
adriangb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021674359
##
datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/source.rs:
##
@@ -349,11 +337,13 @@ impl ParquetSource {
}
/// Optional reference to this parquet scan's pruning
Omega359 opened a new issue, #15511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15511
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
There has been a number of issues where benchmarks stopped working and no
one noticed until someone happened to try and run them.
Omega359 commented on PR #15500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15500#issuecomment-2767230210
I think we may need to augment the github extended tests to run all the
benchmarks, not to validate the results (though we can do that later) but to
just make sure the benchmarks st
Omega359 commented on PR #15500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15500#issuecomment-2767216080
I am seeing the sql_planner benchmark now failing after this was merged.
```
Benchmarking physical_plan_clickbench_q50
Benchmarking physical_plan_clickbench_q50: Warming up f
alamb commented on code in PR #15301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15301#discussion_r2021619914
##
datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/source.rs:
##
@@ -349,11 +337,13 @@ impl ParquetSource {
}
/// Optional reference to this parquet scan's pruning pre
CrystalZhou0529 opened a new pull request, #15510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15510
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes
alamb commented on issue #14587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14587#issuecomment-2767092217
We will probably also need to remove the call to `to_timestamp_seconds`
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15465
As well as
- https://github.com/apache/dataf
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1582:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1582#issuecomment-2767137360
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1582?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
andygrove opened a new issue, #1583:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1583
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
We have focused much of our benchmarking effort on single-node benchmarks
with local data. This does not reflect how Spark is generally
MohamedAbdeen21 closed pull request #1783: MySQL create table options: optional
DEFAULT keyword, CHARACTER SET longhand
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1783
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
alamb commented on issue #15509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15509#issuecomment-2767089209
It is likely that `::INT::DATE` is left over from some old version of
DataFusion that didn't support the correct casting
I think we could just remove them directly
--
Thi
alamb merged PR #15486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15486
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #15465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15465#issuecomment-2767087855
> Another discrepancy I found in the queries is the "EventDate"::INT::DATE"
casting. Is this something we could remove as well? Maybe would be good to look
at all further that are
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1578:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1578#issuecomment-2767086468
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1578?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
Omega359 commented on PR #15508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15508#issuecomment-2767068312
I'll fix the conflicts in a bit, running benchmarks atm.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
alamb commented on issue #15498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15498#issuecomment-2767053406
I think a better / safer strategy would be to avoid `String` at all in the
first place (we can use `Arc` perhaps in places we are copying Strings
> (Actually a is never used
alamb merged PR #15500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15500
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #15367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15367
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #15213: distinct_query_sql benchmark is failing
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15213
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
alamb commented on issue #13814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13814#issuecomment-2767041075
I ran some profiling recently and it seems like catalog is also getting
pretty long to compile
]
+mod tests {
+use supe
alamb merged PR #15459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15459
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #5483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5483#issuecomment-2766954716
> Where to start in understanding DataFusion’s query planning and
optimization workflow.
I think starting at https://datafusion.apache.org/ and
https://datafusion.ap
andygrove merged PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1577
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
comphead commented on issue #15498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15498#issuecomment-2766908135
> Is there some particular hotspot or hotspots where conversion from String
-> &str is happening?
Having applied this we likely can get a performance benefit in planning,
Omega359 opened a new issue, #15507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15507
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Noticed in
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15367#discussion_r2012933341, a lot
of benchmarks are inadvertently includin
PhaniKulkarni commented on issue #5483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5483#issuecomment-2766774770
Hi, I am interested in contributing to Apache DataFusion, specifically in
implementing correlated subqueries support
I have experience in SQL Engines, Data Migration a
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1581:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1581#issuecomment-2766806984
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1581?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
goldmedal commented on issue #15383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15383#issuecomment-2766751553
I'm considering another approach. Maybe I shouldn't use
`filter_record_batch` 🤔. It filters the all column iteratly. I should filter
the row when the accumulator `update_batch
zebsme commented on issue #15383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15383#issuecomment-2766784298
> I'm considering another approach. Maybe I shouldn't use
`filter_record_batch` 🤔. It filters the all column iteratly. I should filter
the row when the accumulator `merge_batch`
iffyio merged PR #1786:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1786
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
alamb commented on PR #15489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15489#issuecomment-2766766045
THanks again @Omega359 and @berkaysynnada
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
iffyio closed issue #1775: Snowflake ALTER SESSION cannot be followed by other
statements.
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1775
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
alamb opened a new pull request, #15506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15506
## Which issue does this PR close?
- part of https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/7363
- related to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3463
## Rationale for this change
adriangb commented on code in PR #15505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15505#discussion_r2021191846
##
docs/source/user-guide/cli/datasources.md:
##
@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ additional configuration options.
# `CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE`
It is also possible to create a
iffyio merged PR #1787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1787
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
Kontinuation opened a new pull request, #1581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1581
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
Comet native operators always write spill files into the default tmp
directory, this
goldmedal commented on PR #15423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15423#issuecomment-2766646972
I did the benchmarks for HashAggregate
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15383#issuecomment-2766551662
It seems that HashAggregate is slower in the selection vector mod
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1580
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1579
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are include
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
