github-actions[bot] closed pull request #1590: Find keywords using perfect
hashing
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1590
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
zero-element commented on issue #2703:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2703#issuecomment-2692570732
I agree with @faucct that this approach could be beneficial for building
Online ML Feature Store engines. This is because such systems often involve
numerous element-wise cal
clflushopt commented on PR #14960:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14960#issuecomment-2692567333
cc @dentiny @alamb minor patch following #14694 and #14890
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
clflushopt opened a new pull request, #14960:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14960
## Which issue does this PR close?
I was setting up a new workstation and while checking the docs I was
redirected to the user guide instead of the development environment page.
clflushopt commented on issue #14896:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14896#issuecomment-2692564535
Following our discussion from before and since I recently documented some
parts of the old statistics API I would be happy to take this if it's not taken
cc @alamb for vis.
alamb merged PR #14756:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14756
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #14910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14910#issuecomment-2692543687
> I dont think I can fix this lol, I tried tweaking `rebase_expr` and
`check_columns_satisfy_exprs` in `datafusion/sql/src/utils.rs` but all failed.
The planner is little too
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #1591: Slightly faster keyword lookups
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1591
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
andygrove commented on issue #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/69#issuecomment-2692500974
> I think, ideally, this new mode of execution diverges as little as
possible from the existing mode of execution and we can use the exact same
physical plans in both cases.
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#issuecomment-2692495354
Testing result:
```rust
> CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE IF NOT EXISTS lineitem (
l_orderkey BIGINT,
l_partkey BIGINT,
l_suppkey BIGINT,
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#discussion_r1976515014
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/parquet_filter_pushdown.slt:
##
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ EXPLAIN select b from t_pushdown where a = 'bar' order by b;
l
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#discussion_r1976514971
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/insert_to_external.slt:
##
@@ -456,13 +456,16 @@ explain insert into table_without_values select c1 from
aggregate_test_
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#discussion_r1976515014
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/parquet_filter_pushdown.slt:
##
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ EXPLAIN select b from t_pushdown where a = 'bar' order by b;
l
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#discussion_r1976514610
##
datafusion-examples/examples/dataframe.rs:
##
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ use tempfile::tempdir;
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> Result<()> {
// The SessionC
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14922#discussion_r1976514485
##
datafusion/core/tests/dataframe/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2400,7 +2400,8 @@ async fn write_json_with_order() -> Result<()> {
#[tokio::test]
async fn write_table_with
blaginin commented on code in PR #14956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14956#discussion_r1976506356
##
datafusion/datasource/src/file_scan_config.rs:
##
@@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ impl DataSource for FileScanConfig {
) -> Result>> {
// If there is any no
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1039
Bumps [uuid](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid) from 1.13.1 to 1.15.1.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/releases";>uuid's releases.
v1.15.1
AdamGS commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976488608
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the TableOpt
logan-keede commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976494633
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the Tab
TheBuilderJR commented on issue #14757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14757#issuecomment-2692420607
@alamb I should have some free cycles soon to do this. Any chance you can
give me some code points or reference PRs that would help with implementation?
Thanks in advance!
logan-keede commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976486683
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the Tab
robtandy opened a new pull request, #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/70
This PR updates names in the repo to be more consistent and also to remove
ambiguity.
Classes are prefixed with `DFRay` to differentiate from `Ray`.
Most importantly, `RayStage` is re
AdamGS commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976484614
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the TableOpt
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #1034: build(deps): bump uuid from 1.13.1
to 1.14.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1034
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1038:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1038
Bumps [arrow](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs) from 54.2.0 to 54.2.1.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/releases";>arrow's
releases.
ar
robtandy commented on issue #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/69#issuecomment-2692393525
This makes sense to me. DFRay as written tries to lean into low latency
execution at all costs, though it does look like it will provide a lot of
utility for longer running dis
robtandy commented on issue #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/69#issuecomment-2692394032
This would allow for a user to specify an exact number of `DFRayProcessors`
to allocate and the stages would execute on those as available, otherwise they
wait.
--
This is an
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1034:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1034#issuecomment-2692384363
Superseded by #1039.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
AdamGS commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976481579
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the TableOpt
AdamGS commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976481607
##
datafusion/core/Cargo.toml:
##
@@ -54,14 +60,15 @@ default = [
"string_expressions",
"unicode_expressions",
"compression",
+"avro",
Review Co
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1037
Bumps [pyo3](https://github.com/pyo3/pyo3) from 0.23.4 to 0.23.5.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/pyo3/pyo3/releases";>pyo3's
releases.
PyO3 0.23.5
T
xudong963 merged PR #14948:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14948
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
kevinjqliu commented on issue #13713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13713#issuecomment-2692377147
I feel like there are a few items from the [blog
post](https://datafusion.apache.org/blog/2025/02/20/datafusion-45.0.0/) that
would be great to include in the report.
andygrove opened a new issue, #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/69
DFRay currently creates "stage processors" for each stage in a query plan
and eagerly executes queries. This is good for low-latency use cases but can
require a large amount of memory.
I would
andygrove commented on issue #46:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/46#issuecomment-2692353922
I think that we can close this particular issue now. I am able to run
benchmarks in a multi node setup. There is still more scalability work to do,
but we can file specific issu
andygrove closed issue #46: Fix scalability limitations of current
implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/46
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
andygrove opened a new issue, #68:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/issues/68
Sometimes I run into resource issues and queries fail. This is to be
expected, but it would be nice if we could provide a more useful error message
on the client.
Example error:
```
E
timsaucer commented on PR #1036:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036#issuecomment-2692325079
I need to update the unit test. I don't think the just validating it hasn't
changed is exactly what we need, so I may think about it some more.
--
This is an automated mess
wiedld commented on code in PR #14919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14919#discussion_r1976065383
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -3346,3 +3351,62 @@ async fn
test_window_partial_constant_and_set_monotonicity() -> Result<()
jamxia155 commented on code in PR #14194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14194#discussion_r1976452271
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/producer.rs:
##
@@ -559,12 +559,31 @@ pub fn from_table_scan(
let table_schema = scan.source.schema().to_dfschema_r
jamxia155 commented on code in PR #14194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14194#discussion_r1976452084
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1327,19 +1327,37 @@ pub async fn from_read_rel(
table_ref: TableReference,
schema:
jamxia155 commented on code in PR #14194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14194#discussion_r1976452057
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1327,19 +1327,37 @@ pub async fn from_read_rel(
table_ref: TableReference,
schema:
jamxia155 commented on code in PR #14194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14194#discussion_r1976451999
##
datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer.rs:
##
@@ -1327,19 +1327,37 @@ pub async fn from_read_rel(
table_ref: TableReference,
schema:
ion-elgreco commented on issue #14944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14944#issuecomment-2691341269
@alamb this is actually already done like that, but it still doesn't prune
properly:
`.map(|expr| context.create_physical_expr(expr,
&df_schema).unwrap())
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #1036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1036
# Which issue does this PR close?
None.
# Rationale for this change
The notebook rendering of DataFrames is very useful, but it can be enhanced.
This PR adds quality o
berkaysynnada commented on code in PR #14919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14919#discussion_r1976434591
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -3346,3 +3351,62 @@ async fn
test_window_partial_constant_and_set_monotonicity() -> Re
linhr opened a new pull request, #14959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14959
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
This is discussed as part of #14123.
## What changes are included in this PR?
`Expr::Wildcard` i
andygrove commented on code in PR #1192:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1192#discussion_r1976437957
##
dev/release/create-tarball.sh:
##
@@ -53,11 +53,6 @@ if [ "$#" -ne 2 ]; then
exit
fi
-if [[ -z "${GH_TOKEN}" ]]; then
-echo "Please set pe
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1192
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
# What changes are included in this PR?
# Are there any user-facing cha
linhr commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2692282881
> Can someone make a PR soon? We are in the final phases of getting ready
for 46 release
I've created a PR to deprecate `Expr::Wildcard`: #14959.
--
This is an automated
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1191
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
# What changes are included in this PR?
# Are there any user-facing cha
berkaysynnada commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2692276290
I got a bit off-topic, but we will focus on this promising work to drive it
to completion in the coming week, together with @mertak-synnada.
--
This is an automated message f
andygrove merged PR #1190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1190
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
jonahgao opened a new issue, #14958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14958
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Currently, table functions like `range` only support literal arguments.
```sh
DataFusion CLI v45.0.0
> select * from range
xudong963 commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2692260440
@alamb Make sense, made the branch:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/branch-46
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
logan-keede commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976406045
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the Tab
logan-keede commented on code in PR #14951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14951#discussion_r1976405859
##
datafusion/core/src/execution/session_state.rs:
##
@@ -832,17 +836,16 @@ impl SessionState {
self.config.options()
}
-/// return the Tab
milenkovicm commented on PR #14935:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14935#issuecomment-2692244166
I just wonder if we should provide `with_default_features` or
`Default::default` implementation for this case as well? wdyt @alamb ?
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
alamb commented on issue #14944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14944#issuecomment-2691336051
I think the conclusion is that PruningPredicaate expects a properly coerced
expression already
You can use `SessionContext::create_physical_expr` to automatically perform
c
iffyio merged PR #1752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1752
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
alamb opened a new pull request, #14938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14938
- Draft as it builds on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14685
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14685
## R
alamb commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2692196440
We found one more issue while testing 46 in delta-rs:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14957
@blaginin has a PR up to address it:
- https://github.com/apac
alamb commented on code in PR #14956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14956#discussion_r1976407254
##
datafusion/datasource/src/file_scan_config.rs:
##
@@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ impl DataSource for FileScanConfig {
) -> Result>> {
// If there is any non-c
alamb commented on PR #14948:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14948#issuecomment-2692198056
> Thank you @alamb , it makes sense to me.
>
> So next step is, after we releasing 46.0.0, we revert this PR.
>
> And i created a follow-up ticket to fix the remaining mult
alamb commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2692200337
@xudong963
I just merged
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14903
Can you now make a `branch-46` branch?
That will then allow us to merge additiona
AdamGS commented on issue #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1#issuecomment-2692199949
The PR is out, but I suspect it's too big. I tried to get it in the 46
release, but now that I probably missed that, @alamb (or any other reviewers)
would you prefer I split it u
alamb merged PR #14903:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14903
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #14919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14919#issuecomment-2692197860
Reverted in
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14950
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
alamb commented on PR #14954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14954#issuecomment-2692197495
Thanks @zhuqi-lucas -- I'll try and check this out soon (likely tomorrow)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
alamb commented on issue #14810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14810#issuecomment-2692197186
We had to revert this change temporarily to get the 46 release out
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14948
So reopening the PR
--
This is an automated message
Garamda commented on code in PR #13511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13511#discussion_r1976295147
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/approx_percentile_cont.rs:
##
@@ -51,29 +52,43 @@ create_func!(ApproxPercentileCont,
approx_percentile_cont_udaf);
/// Co
alamb commented on code in PR #14946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14946#discussion_r1976405417
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/aggregates/mod.rs:
##
@@ -57,41 +57,53 @@ mod row_hash;
mod topk;
mod topk_stream;
-/// Hash aggregate modes
+/// Aggregation mod
alamb commented on issue #14957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14957#issuecomment-2692196135
@blaginin has a proposed fix for this:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14956
❤
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
alamb commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2692195887
> +1 for marking `Expr::Wildcard` as deprecated.
>
> > Expr::Wildcard is still used in other cases not only count(*). We only
remove the count wildcard case, so we can't dep
alamb opened a new issue, #14957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14957
### Describe the bug
As part of testing DataFusion 46.0.0 on Delta.rs in
- https://github.com/delta-io/delta-rs/pull/3261
Here is an example failure:
https://github.com/delta-io/d
wiedld commented on code in PR #14919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14919#discussion_r1975887998
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_sorting.rs:
##
@@ -3346,3 +3351,62 @@ async fn
test_window_partial_constant_and_set_monotonicity() -> Result<()
alamb commented on issue #13713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13713#issuecomment-2692172475
FYI @iffyio and @robtandy in case you wanted to suggest any additions for
datafusion ray / sqlparser
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
alamb commented on issue #13713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13713#issuecomment-2692172863
Mailing list announcement:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7g8b66wdhpdj9tn77ptzy2790bj3l47d
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
alamb commented on issue #13713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13713#issuecomment-2692172346
Here is a google doc to coordinate board reporting:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11b2GEmPh5gblWWegeZi3G38e97vRqHSRElkLTwZHrjY/edit?tab=t.0
Please feel free to post com
qazxcdswe123 commented on issue #14910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14910#issuecomment-2692166597
untake
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
qazxcdswe123 commented on issue #14910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14910#issuecomment-2692166110
I dont think I can fix this lol, I tried tweaking `rebase_expr` and
`check_columns_satisfy_exprs` in `datafusion/sql/src/utils.rs` but all failed.
The planner is little too
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #14954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14954#issuecomment-2692165153
Updated testing result:
```rust
DataFusion CLI v45.0.0
> create table foo(x int, y int) as values (1,2), (3,4);
0 row(s) fetched.
Elapsed 0.026 seconds.
> exp
alamb merged PR #14950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14950
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #1321:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1321#issuecomment-2691343558
Looks like there are formatting issues
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
alamb commented on issue #14944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14944#issuecomment-2691384188
🤔 What are the coerced expressions?
If it is like this:
```
cast(month_id, 'utf8') = '202502'
```
That is not going to prune because the cast is happeni
iffyio merged PR #1754:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1754
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
blaginin commented on PR #14956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14956#issuecomment-2692137880
```
uv run pytest
== 472 passed, 4 skipped, 47
deselected, 90 warnings in 23.16s
=
blaginin opened a new pull request, #14956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14956
## Which issue does this PR close?
Related to
https://github.com/delta-io/delta-rs/pull/3261#issuecomment-2691373678
## Rationale for this change
I feel like there s
ion-elgreco commented on issue #14944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14944#issuecomment-2692138942
It's like cast(month_id, 'utf8') = '202502', see below:
```
[crates/core/src/delta_datafusion/mod.rs:551:9] self.filter.clone() = Some(
BinaryExpr(
xudong963 closed issue #14947: datafusion-cli regression: explain plan output
looks bad (error rendering multi-lines)
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14947
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
simonvandel commented on issue #14660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14660#issuecomment-2692109389
Here's a short video presentation by a Google engineer
https://www.hytradboi.com/2025/f8582cd3-1e39-43a8-8749-46817b2910cf-pipe-syntax-in-sql-its-time
--
This is an automa
xudong963 commented on PR #14891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14891#issuecomment-2692102278
After the PR is merged, I'll update changlog PR and make the branch-46.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
Weijun-H commented on PR #14411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14411#issuecomment-2692083297
I actually anticipate higher memory consumption, particularly in systems
where the upstream portion of RepartitionExec generates results faster than the
downstream component process
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #14946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14946#discussion_r1976265670
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/aggregates/mod.rs:
##
@@ -57,41 +57,53 @@ mod row_hash;
mod topk;
mod topk_stream;
-/// Hash aggregate modes
+/// Aggregatio
Standing-Man opened a new pull request, #14955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14955
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14937.
## Rationale for this change
Both `FileScanConfig` and `DataSource` has same statistics, it make that
stat
geoffreyclaude commented on code in PR #14547:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14547#discussion_r1976361324
##
datafusion/common-runtime/src/join_set.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor li
96 matches
Mail list logo
