Christian Couder writes:
> I can send a new version where the top two commits have the following titles:
>
> - replace: peel tag when passing a tag first to --graft
> - replace: peel tag when passing a tag as parent to --graft
If/when there are other things that needs fixing in the series, t
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> For me, this does not work without this squashed in:
>
> -- snipsnap --
> diff --git a/t/t7004-tag.sh b/t/t7004-tag.sh
> index 33a1d70b434d..7767cb1fab64 100755
> --- a/t/t7004-tag.sh
> +++ b/t/t7004-tag.sh
> @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ test_expect_success '--points-at fin
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:08 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * cc/replace-graft-peel-tags (2019-04-01) 4 commits
> - replace: fix --graft when passing a tag first
> - replace: fix --graft when passing a tag as parent
> - t6050: redirect expected error output to a file
> - t6050: use test_line_count
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jh/trace2-sid-fix (2019-04-01) 7 commits
> - trace2: make SIDs more unique
> - trace2: clarify UTC datetime formatting
> - trace2: report peak memory usage of the process
> - trace2: use system config for default trace2 settings
> - tr
Hi Phillip,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 09/04/2019 19:08, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
> > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit
> >> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36)
> >> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary
>
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * dl/warn-tagging-a-tag (2019-04-09) 2 commits
> - tag: advise on nested tags
> - tag: fix formatting
>
> "git tag" learned to give an advice suggesting it might be a
> mistake when creating an annotated or signed tag that points at
> an
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * nd/switch-and-restore (2019-04-02) 39 commits
> - doc: promote "git restore"
> - completion: support restore
> - SQUASH??? move -p test to 2071 from 2070
> - t: add tests for restore
> - restore: support --patch
> - restore: default t
On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit
> >> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36)
> >> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary
> >> (this branc
> * am/p4-branches-excludes (2019-04-02) 8 commits
> - git-p4: respect excluded paths when detecting branches
> - git-p4: add failing test for "git-p4: respect excluded paths when
> detecting branches"
> - git-p4: don't exclude other files with same prefix
> - git-p4: add failing test for "don
On 09/04/2019 19:08, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding o
Denton Liu writes:
>> * dl/submodule-set-branch (2019-02-08) 3 commits
>> ...
>> Needs sign-off on the tip commit; other than that it seems OK to be in
>> 'next'.
>
> This has been here for a while. Did you need my explicit sign-off for
> this? If that's the case, here you go:
>
> Signed-off-b
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit
>> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36)
>> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary
>> (this branch uses ps/stash-in-c; is tangled with js/stash-i
Hi,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * tz/doc-apostrophe-no-longer-needed (2019-04-08) 1 commit
> - Documentation/git-show-branch: drop last use of {apostrophe}
>
> Doc formatting fix.
>
> Will merge to 'next'.
>
>
> * tz/git-svn-doc-markup-fix (2019-04-08) 1 commit
> - Documentation/git-svn: impro
On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit
> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36)
> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary
> (this branch uses ps/stash-in-c; is tangled with js/stash-in-c-pathspec-fix
> and tb/stash-
Hi Junio,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:08:09AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * dl/submodule-set-branch (2019-02-08) 3 commits
> - submodule: teach set-branch subcommand
> - submodule--helper: teach config subcommand --unset
> - git-submodule.txt: "--branch " option defaults to 'master'
>
> "gi
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
Sorry for keeping a rather huge ba
17 matches
Mail list logo
